Scotland - League TwoAinslie Park StadiumData current as of 30 August 2026

Spartans vs Clyde: match statistics

Spartans crest
Spartans
3 : 3half-time 0:1
Clyde crest
Clyde

Spartans vs Clyde: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Spartans played Clyde in League Two (Scotland). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Ainslie Park Stadium. Final score: 3:3.

Current form

Spartans: 1-2-1, 1.25 points/match. Clyde: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match.

Goal statistics

Spartans scores 2.25 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Clyde scores 2.00 and concedes 0.75. League average: 3.14 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Spartans 75%, Clyde 50%. Over 2.5: Spartans 75%, Clyde 75%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Clyde has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.13. Spartans: 7.3 shots per match, Clyde: 12.8.

Match halves

Spartans: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 2.00. Clyde: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Spartans: 76-90+ (7 goals). Clyde: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League Two: 3.14 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Clyde top the table and have collected 9 points from their last 5 matches, while Spartans have earned 6 points over the same period. However, the visitors’ advantage is clearly diminishing in away fixtures. Spartans have drawn both of their home matches so far, scoring an average of 2.5 goals, but conceding just as many and failing to keep a single clean sheet. Clyde score only 1 goal per away game and failed to find the net in half of those matches, despite dominating possession at 82%. The hosts are highly efficient, converting 42% of their shots into goals, although their xG stands at just 1.06, while Clyde average 1.20 xG away from home. Both defences allow opponents chances worth more than 1 xG, making goals likely; however, Spartans’ draw-heavy home profile points towards the points being shared.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is strengthened by their current form: Spartans recorded BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, while Clyde did so in 60%. During this period, the hosts scored an average of 2.2 goals and conceded 2.0, whereas the visitors netted 1.8 goals and conceded 1.4. Clyde should create chances against the Spartans defence, which has recorded 1.23 xG conceded in its recent matches, while Clyde itself generates an average of 1.32 xG. Spartans have a clear attacking advantage at home, averaging 3.0 goals, 1.83 xG and 6.0 shots on target per match, making a goal for the hosts highly likely. The risk to the pick is Spartans' stronger defensive record over the entire season, with 50% clean sheets and only 0.5 goals conceded on average; however, the recent results provide clearer support for BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Spartans score an average of 3.0 goals at home, while Clyde concede an average of 1.0 goal away from home, clearly supporting at least two goals in the match. In their last five games, Spartans scored 2.2 goals and conceded 2.0 per match, while Clyde’s games produced an average of 1.8 goals scored and 1.4 conceded. The 2.5 line was covered in 80% of the last five matches for both teams, but the forecast is tempered by moderate xG figures: 1.03 for Spartans and 1.32 for Clyde over this period. However, the hosts create more chances, averaging 15.5 shots and 6.0 shots on target compared with Clyde’s 10.0 and 3.5. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5, as both teams had 100% of their seasonal matches featuring at least one goal, while the hosts’ attacking potential significantly increases the likelihood of a second goal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Spartans have taken all six points from their two home matches, scoring an average of 3.0 goals and conceding just 0.5, which strongly supports a home win in the full-time result. Clyde were level at half-time in both of their away matches so far, failing to lead on either occasion; therefore, a draw after 45 minutes is the most logical opening scenario. The hosts create more chances, with an average xG of 1.83 compared with Clyde’s 1.20, while they also average 6.0 shots on target against 3.5 for their opponents. Although Spartans have led at the break in only 20% of their last five matches, they have scored an average of 1.8 goals after half-time, favouring an HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by a home win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
3 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
SpartansClyde
12Shots10
SpartansClyde
7Shots on target5
SpartansClyde
1.9xG1.39
SpartansClyde
10Corners4
SpartansClyde
91Dangerous attacks56
SpartansClyde
12Fouls12
SpartansClyde
0Cards6
SpartansClyde

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.25Goals scored / match2
SpartansClyde
2Goals conceded / match0.75
SpartansClyde
58%Average possession67%
SpartansClyde
4.25Shots on target / match4.75
SpartansClyde

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.25Shots per match12.75
SpartansClyde
4.25Shots on target4.75
SpartansClyde
31%Shot conversion15.7%
SpartansClyde
58%Possession67%
SpartansClyde
1.13xG for1.51
SpartansClyde
1.24xG against1.1
SpartansClyde

Shooting quality

Spartans: Efficient finishingClyde: Efficient finishing
SpartansClyde
Accuracy (shots on target)59%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.530.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Clyde is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.25 pts / match - Spartans · 2.25 pts / match - Clyde

Spartans
WDLD
Season result split
25% W50% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-1
1.25 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-1
1.25 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 at home
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.3Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 75%
Clyde
WLWW
Season result split
75% W0% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Spartans is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

2.25 goals / match - Spartans · 2 goals / match - Clyde

Clyde is 167% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Spartans · 0.75 goals / match - Clyde

Spartans scoring profile: very strong

Spartans scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Clyde keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

Clyde scoring profile: very strong

Clyde scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Spartans keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

9Goals scored (season)8
SpartansClyde
8Goals conceded (season)3
SpartansClyde
4.25Average goals in match2.75
SpartansClyde
9Goals scored (last 5)8
SpartansClyde
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
SpartansClyde

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal75%
SpartansClyde
75%2 goals75%
SpartansClyde
50%3 goals50%
SpartansClyde
25%4 goals0%
SpartansClyde

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal75%
SpartansClyde
75%2 goals0%
SpartansClyde
25%3 goals0%
SpartansClyde
0%4 goals0%
SpartansClyde

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time50%
SpartansClyde
25%BTTS in both halves0%
SpartansClyde
25%Scored in both halves50%
SpartansClyde

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
SpartansClyde
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
SpartansClyde
75%BTTS - last 550%
SpartansClyde

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
SpartansClyde
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time75%
SpartansClyde
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
SpartansClyde

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
SpartansClyde
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
SpartansClyde
75%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SpartansClyde

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Clyde is 700% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.25 pts / match - Spartans · 2 pts / match - Clyde

Spartans - half-time state
0% leading25% draw75% trailing
Clyde - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.25Points per match (1st half)2
SpartansClyde
0.25Goals scored (1st half)1.5
SpartansClyde
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
SpartansClyde
1.25Average goals (1st half)2
SpartansClyde
25%Clean sheet before half-time50%
SpartansClyde
75%No goal before half-time25%
SpartansClyde

After half-time (2nd half)

2.25Points per match (2nd half)1.75
SpartansClyde
2Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
SpartansClyde
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.25
SpartansClyde
3Average goals (2nd half)0.75
SpartansClyde
0%Clean sheet after half-time75%
SpartansClyde
25%No goal after half-time50%
SpartansClyde

Spartans - second-half results

75% W0% R25% P
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.25
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Clyde - second-half results

50% W25% R25% P
8
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Spartans - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.252.25
Goals scored / match0.32.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.33.0
1 goal75%100%
2 goals25%75%
3 goals25%75%
Clean sheet25%0%
No goal75%25%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 25% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 0% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1
Clyde - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.75
Goals scored / match1.50.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.3
Average goals in match2.00.8
1 goal75%75%
2 goals75%0%
3 goals25%0%
Clean sheet50%75%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Spartans
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
7
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Clyde
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
4
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Spartans

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.76
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.8
Late goals
78% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
78%

Clyde

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
43%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

SpartansLigaClyde
Average goals in match 4.253.14 2.75
Both teams scored 75%52% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%62% 75%
Clean sheets 0%24% 25%
Goal before half-time 75%76% 75%
Goal after half-time 100%86% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.14
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ClydeYellow cardKyle Fleming
  2. ClydeRed cardLogan Dunachie
  3. ClydeSubstitutionOn: Sam CampbellOff: Kyle Connell
  4. SpartansGoalRicardo Dinanga
  5. ClydeYellow cardLewis Lovering
  6. SpartansGoalMatthew MudieAssist: James Craigen
  7. ClydeYellow cardKeir Gilligan
  8. SpartansGoalAyrton SonkurAssist: Bradley Whyte
  9. ClydeYellow cardThomas Cruden

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Spartans 2 - 1 - 1 Clyde. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Spartans FC
2 : 1
Clyde FC
Clyde FC
2 : 1
Spartans FC
Spartans FC
1 : 1
Clyde FC
Clyde FC
1 : 3
Spartans FC

FAQ

What was the result of Spartans vs Clyde?

The League Two match finished Spartans 3:3 Clyde. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Spartans and Clyde?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Spartans won 2, Clyde won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Spartans vs Clyde?

Spartans score 2.25 goals per game on average and Clyde 2.00. The League Two average is 3.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Spartans's matches and 50% of Clyde's.

What form are Spartans and Clyde in?

Over the last 5 games Spartans have a 1-2-1 record (1.25 points per game) and Clyde 3-0-1 (2.25 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Spartans vs Clyde?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.