Spokane Velocity vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Spokane Velocity vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Spokane Velocity play Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The match date is 18 October 2026.
Current form
Spokane Velocity: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Spokane Velocity scores 1.59 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.67 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.99 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Spokane Velocity 55%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 57%. Over 2.5: Spokane Velocity 62%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 60%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Chattanooga Red Wolves has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.44. Spokane Velocity: 12.1 shots per match, Chattanooga Red Wolves: 12.1.
Match halves
Spokane Velocity: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.83. Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.87.
Goals by minute
Spokane Velocity: 31-45+ (10 goals). Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Spokane Velocity | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Spokane Velocity is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Spokane Velocity · 0.8 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.59 goals / match - Spokane Velocity · 1.67 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Spokane Velocity scores in 79% of matches (23 of 29 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Spokane Velocity keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Spokane Velocity
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Spokane Velocity is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.45 pts / match - Spokane Velocity · 1.37 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Spokane Velocity - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Spokane Velocity
Chattanooga Red Wolves
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Spokane Velocity | Liga | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.97 | 2.99 | ▲ 3.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 55% | 60% | ▼ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 60% | • 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 23% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | • 76% | 75% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 81% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Spokane Velocity 1 - 0 - 2 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
When do Spokane Velocity and Chattanooga Red Wolves play?
Spokane Velocity face Chattanooga Red Wolves on 18 October 2026 in USL League One. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Spokane Velocity and Chattanooga Red Wolves?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Spokane Velocity won 1, Chattanooga Red Wolves won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Spokane Velocity vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
Spokane Velocity score 1.59 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.67. The USL League One average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Spokane Velocity's matches and 57% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.
What form are Spokane Velocity and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?
Over the last 5 games Spokane Velocity have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Spokane Velocity vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.