Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest: match statistics
Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sunderland played Nottingham Forest in Premier League (England). The match was played on 24 April 2026. Final score: 0:5.
Current form
Sunderland: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Nottingham Forest: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sunderland scores 1.09 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Nottingham Forest scores 1.09 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sunderland 45%, Nottingham Forest 42%. Over 2.5: Sunderland 42%, Nottingham Forest 52%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Nottingham Forest has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.18. Sunderland: 10.0 shots per match, Nottingham Forest: 12.6.
Match halves
Sunderland: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.76. Nottingham Forest: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.73.
Goals by minute
Sunderland: 76-90+ (11 goals). Nottingham Forest: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier League: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sunderland holds a clear defensive edge at home — conceding on average 0.88 goals per home match versus Nottingham’s 1.5 conceded on the road. In attack the hosts average 1.44 goals at home, while the visitors record 1.13 goals away, and the share of goalless matches is 19% versus 31% in favor of Sunderland. xG are nearly identical (1.28 xG for Sunderland at home vs 1.25 xG for Nottingham away), but Nottingham have scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches compared to Sunderland’s 6, which gives the visitors an offensive momentum. Nottingham have a better recent points form over the last 5 fixtures (2.2 pts/match vs Sunderland’s 1.2 pts/match), yet their away record is weaker (away wins 31% vs Sunderland’s 50% at home and goal difference -6 away vs +9 for the hosts). Therefore I forecast a home win with approximate probabilities: 55% home, 25% draw, 20% Nottingham win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS - Yes in Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest with a 60% probability (No 40%). Nottingham have scored 10 and conceded 3 in their last 5 (2.0 for, 0.6 against) with BTTS 60% in that span, while Sunderland have 6 for and 7 against in their last 5 (1.2 and 1.4) with BTTS 40%. Season-long BTTS rates are moderate — Sunderland 41%, Nottingham 44% — but the league average BTTS is 55%; combined with low clean sheet expected rates (Sunderland 24%, Nottingham 25%) this increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. The xG and shots profile supports this: Sunderland have xG For 1.65 and average 14.88 shots (3.82 on target), creating chances above their 1.06 goals scored average, and Nottingham have xG For 1.25 with an 11% conversion rate and xG Against 1.57 — both sides have a realistic chance to score. Considering Nottingham’s strong recent attacking form (10 goals), Sunderland’s susceptibility to conceding, and their chance creation (xG 1.65), the Goal/Goal scenario appears more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-and-form based model projects total goals around 2.89. Sunderland has xG_for 1.65, while Nottingham concedes on average xG 1.57, averaging ~1.61 for the home side; Nottingham has xG_for 1.25 versus Sunderland’s xG_conceded 1.31, yielding ~1.28 for the away side. This combined xG (2.89) is significantly higher than the teams’ seasonal goals sum 1.06+1.13=2.19 and slightly above the league average 2.74, which favors Over. In the last 5 matches Nottingham scored 10 goals (2.0 avg) and conceded 3 (0.6 avg), while Sunderland scored 6 (1.2) and conceded 7 (1.4); shot conversion is 7.0% for Sunderland and 11.0% for Nottingham, so the visitors are more efficient. Considering season Over 1.5 rates — 71% for Sunderland and 88% for Nottingham — I estimate a 78% chance of Over 1.5 (55% for Over 2.5); therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Sunderland draws at half-time in 59% of matches, scores an average of 0.41 goals in the first half and keeps a clean sheet at the break in 53% of games, which strongly indicates an even, low-scoring opening period. Nottingham concedes an average of 0.94 goals by half-time, but in their last five matches they led at the break in 40% of games and have recently recorded a 60% win rate, so they are capable of imposing tempo when in form. Sunderland produces higher xG (1.65 vs. the visitors’ 1.25) and more shots (14.88 vs. 10.25), but Nottingham are more efficient in finishing (conversion rate 11% vs. the home side’s 7%). In the second half the visitors’ advantage is evident: Nottingham score an average of 0.81 goals after the break and win the second half in 44% of matches, whereas Sunderland win it in 24% and collect fewer points after half-time (1.06 vs. 1.63). Summing these figures, the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Nottingham turnaround for the full-time result (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sunderland | Nottingham Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sunderland is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.21 goals / match - Sunderland · 1.36 goals / match - Nottingham Forest
Sunderland scores in 67% of matches (22 of 33 matches), while Nottingham Forest keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 matches).
Nottingham Forest scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while Sunderland keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sunderland
Over / Under - Nottingham Forest
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sunderland is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - Sunderland · 0.85 pts / match - Nottingham Forest
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sunderland - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Nottingham Forest - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sunderland
Nottingham Forest
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Sunderland | Liga | Nottingham Forest | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.30 | 2.74 | ▼ 2.45 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 55% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 54% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 26% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 71% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 79% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Sunderland 1 - 0 - 0 Nottingham Forest. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest?
The Premier League match finished Sunderland 0:5 Nottingham Forest. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest?
Sunderland score 1.09 goals per game on average and Nottingham Forest 1.09. The Premier League average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Sunderland's matches and 42% of Nottingham Forest's.
What form are Sunderland and Nottingham Forest in?
Over the last 5 games Sunderland have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Nottingham Forest 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


