England - Premier LeagueData current as of 12 September 2026

Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest: match statistics

Sunderland crest
Sunderland
0 : 5half-time 0:4
Nottingham Forest crest
Nottingham Forest

Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sunderland played Nottingham Forest in Premier League (England). The match was played on 24 April 2026. Final score: 0:5.

Current form

Sunderland: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Nottingham Forest: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sunderland scores 1.09 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Nottingham Forest scores 1.09 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sunderland 45%, Nottingham Forest 42%. Over 2.5: Sunderland 42%, Nottingham Forest 52%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Nottingham Forest has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.18. Sunderland: 10.0 shots per match, Nottingham Forest: 12.6.

Match halves

Sunderland: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.76. Nottingham Forest: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Sunderland: 76-90+ (11 goals). Nottingham Forest: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premier League: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sunderland holds a clear defensive edge at home — conceding on average 0.88 goals per home match versus Nottingham’s 1.5 conceded on the road. In attack the hosts average 1.44 goals at home, while the visitors record 1.13 goals away, and the share of goalless matches is 19% versus 31% in favor of Sunderland. xG are nearly identical (1.28 xG for Sunderland at home vs 1.25 xG for Nottingham away), but Nottingham have scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches compared to Sunderland’s 6, which gives the visitors an offensive momentum. Nottingham have a better recent points form over the last 5 fixtures (2.2 pts/match vs Sunderland’s 1.2 pts/match), yet their away record is weaker (away wins 31% vs Sunderland’s 50% at home and goal difference -6 away vs +9 for the hosts). Therefore I forecast a home win with approximate probabilities: 55% home, 25% draw, 20% Nottingham win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I project BTTS - Yes in Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest with a 60% probability (No 40%). Nottingham have scored 10 and conceded 3 in their last 5 (2.0 for, 0.6 against) with BTTS 60% in that span, while Sunderland have 6 for and 7 against in their last 5 (1.2 and 1.4) with BTTS 40%. Season-long BTTS rates are moderate — Sunderland 41%, Nottingham 44% — but the league average BTTS is 55%; combined with low clean sheet expected rates (Sunderland 24%, Nottingham 25%) this increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. The xG and shots profile supports this: Sunderland have xG For 1.65 and average 14.88 shots (3.82 on target), creating chances above their 1.06 goals scored average, and Nottingham have xG For 1.25 with an 11% conversion rate and xG Against 1.57 — both sides have a realistic chance to score. Considering Nottingham’s strong recent attacking form (10 goals), Sunderland’s susceptibility to conceding, and their chance creation (xG 1.65), the Goal/Goal scenario appears more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-and-form based model projects total goals around 2.89. Sunderland has xG_for 1.65, while Nottingham concedes on average xG 1.57, averaging ~1.61 for the home side; Nottingham has xG_for 1.25 versus Sunderland’s xG_conceded 1.31, yielding ~1.28 for the away side. This combined xG (2.89) is significantly higher than the teams’ seasonal goals sum 1.06+1.13=2.19 and slightly above the league average 2.74, which favors Over. In the last 5 matches Nottingham scored 10 goals (2.0 avg) and conceded 3 (0.6 avg), while Sunderland scored 6 (1.2) and conceded 7 (1.4); shot conversion is 7.0% for Sunderland and 11.0% for Nottingham, so the visitors are more efficient. Considering season Over 1.5 rates — 71% for Sunderland and 88% for Nottingham — I estimate a 78% chance of Over 1.5 (55% for Over 2.5); therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Sunderland draws at half-time in 59% of matches, scores an average of 0.41 goals in the first half and keeps a clean sheet at the break in 53% of games, which strongly indicates an even, low-scoring opening period. Nottingham concedes an average of 0.94 goals by half-time, but in their last five matches they led at the break in 40% of games and have recently recorded a 60% win rate, so they are capable of imposing tempo when in form. Sunderland produces higher xG (1.65 vs. the visitors’ 1.25) and more shots (14.88 vs. 10.25), but Nottingham are more efficient in finishing (conversion rate 11% vs. the home side’s 7%). In the second half the visitors’ advantage is evident: Nottingham score an average of 0.81 goals after the break and win the second half in 44% of matches, whereas Sunderland win it in 24% and collect fewer points after half-time (1.06 vs. 1.63). Summing these figures, the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Nottingham turnaround for the full-time result (X/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 4
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
SunderlandNottingham Forest
14Shots10
SunderlandNottingham Forest
4Shots on target6
SunderlandNottingham Forest
1.77xG1.29
SunderlandNottingham Forest
3Corners6
SunderlandNottingham Forest
84Dangerous attacks32
SunderlandNottingham Forest
13Fouls15
SunderlandNottingham Forest
2Cards5
SunderlandNottingham Forest

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

SunderlandNottingham Forest
1.09Goals scored / match1.09
SunderlandNottingham Forest
1.21Goals conceded / match1.36
SunderlandNottingham Forest
44%Average possession47%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
3.36Shots on target / match3.97
SunderlandNottingham Forest

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.97Shots per match12.64
SunderlandNottingham Forest
3.36Shots on target3.97
SunderlandNottingham Forest
10.9%Shot conversion8.6%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
44%Possession47%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
1.18xG for1.45
SunderlandNottingham Forest
1.65xG against1.43
SunderlandNottingham Forest

Shooting quality

Sunderland: BalancedNottingham Forest: Balanced
SunderlandNottingham Forest
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sunderland
WLWWL
Season result split
36% W30% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-11
1.39 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-5-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Nottingham Forest
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
27% W27% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-15
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-8
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sunderland is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.21 goals / match - Sunderland · 1.36 goals / match - Nottingham Forest

Sunderland scoring profile: strong

Sunderland scores in 67% of matches (22 of 33 matches), while Nottingham Forest keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 matches).

Nottingham Forest scoring profile: strong

Nottingham Forest scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while Sunderland keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).

36Goals scored (season)36
SunderlandNottingham Forest
40Goals conceded (season)45
SunderlandNottingham Forest
2.3Average goals in match2.45
SunderlandNottingham Forest
7Goals scored (last 5)10
SunderlandNottingham Forest
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
SunderlandNottingham Forest

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal58%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
30%2 goals30%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
12%3 goals18%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
0%4 goals3%
SunderlandNottingham Forest

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal76%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
30%2 goals42%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
18%3 goals18%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
3%4 goals0%
SunderlandNottingham Forest

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Nottingham Forest - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 33 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time15%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
3%BTTS in both halves0%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
21%Scored in both halves15%
SunderlandNottingham Forest

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS21%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
40%BTTS - last 560%
SunderlandNottingham Forest

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
SunderlandNottingham Forest

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
SunderlandNottingham Forest

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sunderland is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / match - Sunderland · 0.85 pts / match - Nottingham Forest

Sunderland - half-time state
18% leading52% draw30% trailing
Nottingham Forest - half-time state
15% leading39% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per match (1st half)0.85
SunderlandNottingham Forest
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.36
SunderlandNottingham Forest
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.7
SunderlandNottingham Forest
0.88Average goals (1st half)1.06
SunderlandNottingham Forest
64%Clean sheet before half-time42%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
70%No goal before half-time70%
SunderlandNottingham Forest

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per match (2nd half)1.33
SunderlandNottingham Forest
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
SunderlandNottingham Forest
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
SunderlandNottingham Forest
1.42Average goals (2nd half)1.39
SunderlandNottingham Forest
55%Clean sheet after half-time58%
SunderlandNottingham Forest
42%No goal after half-time58%
SunderlandNottingham Forest

Sunderland - second-half results

42% W24% D33% L
35
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nottingham Forest - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
28
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding180%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sunderland - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Nottingham Forest - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.20
Goals scored / match0.41.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+7
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sunderland
ScoredConceded
2
8
0-15
5
4
16-30
4
6
31-45
4
6
46-60
10
9
61-75
11
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Nottingham Forest
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
1
6
16-30
5
12
31-45
8
7
46-60
6
2
61-75
10
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-58%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sunderland

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Nottingham Forest

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).

Teams vs league

SunderlandLigaNottingham Forest
Average goals in match 2.302.74 2.45
Both teams scored 45%55% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%54% 52%
Clean sheets 30%26% 24%
Goal before half-time 55%71% 73%
Goal after half-time 85%79% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SunderlandGoalTrai Hume
  2. Nottingham ForestGoalIgor Jesus Maciel da Cruz
  3. Nottingham ForestSubstitutionOn: Nicolás Martín DomínguezOff: Ibrahim Sangaru00e9
  4. SunderlandSubstitutionOn: Reinildo Isnard MandavaOff: Chris Rigg
  5. Nottingham ForestSubstitutionOn: Felipe Rodrigues da SilvaOff: Jair Paula da Cunha Filho
  6. Nottingham ForestYellow cardNicolás Martín Domínguez
  7. SunderlandYellow cardMouhamadou Diarra
  8. Nottingham ForestYellow cardElliot Anderson
  9. Nottingham ForestYellow cardIgor Jesus Maciel da Cruz
  10. SunderlandSubstitutionOn: Wilson IsidorOff: Mouhamadou Diarra
  11. Nottingham ForestYellow cardNeco Shay Williams
  12. SunderlandYellow cardGranit Xhaka
  13. Nottingham ForestYellow cardRyan James Yates
  14. Nottingham ForestSubstitutionOn: Taiwo Micheal AwoniyiOff: Christopher Grant Wood
  15. Nottingham ForestGoalElliot AndersonAssist: Taiwo Micheal Awoniyi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Darren EnglandMatches officiated: 23
4.57Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 243%Home wins26%Draws30%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Sunderland 1 - 0 - 0 Nottingham Forest. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Nottingham Forest FC
0 : 1
Sunderland AFC

FAQ

What was the result of Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest?

The Premier League match finished Sunderland 0:5 Nottingham Forest. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest?

Sunderland score 1.09 goals per game on average and Nottingham Forest 1.09. The Premier League average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Sunderland's matches and 42% of Nottingham Forest's.

What form are Sunderland and Nottingham Forest in?

Over the last 5 games Sunderland have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Nottingham Forest 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.