Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 02 November 2026

Super Nova II vs Rīgas FS II: match statistics

Super Nova II crest
Super Nova II
2 : 4half-time 1:3
Rīgas FS II crest
Rīgas FS II

Super Nova II vs Rīgas FS II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Super Nova II played Rīgas FS II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Final score: 2:4.

Current form

Super Nova II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Rīgas FS II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Super Nova II scores 1.38 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Rīgas FS II scores 1.58 and concedes 2.79. League average: 3.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Super Nova II 67%, Rīgas FS II 67%. Over 2.5: Super Nova II 50%, Rīgas FS II 79%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 71%.

xG, shots and style

Rīgas FS II has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.14. Super Nova II: 6.8 shots per match, Rīgas FS II: 9.8.

Match halves

Super Nova II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.54. Rīgas FS II: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Super Nova II: 0-15 (7 goals). Rīgas FS II: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.71 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 71%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Super Nova II have the home advantage, having won 36% of their matches there, while Rīgas FS II have lost 67% of their away games. The biggest difference is defensively: the hosts concede an average of 1.45 goals per home match, compared with a hefty 3.17 for the visitors away from home. Recent results also favour the hosts — they have collected 5 points and conceded 8 goals across their last five matches, while the visitors have earned 3 points and conceded 16 goals. Rīgas FS II can still pose a threat, averaging 1.33 goals away from home with an xG of 1.30, compared with the hosts’ home averages of 1.18 goals and an xG of 1.10. Even so, the visitors’ poor defence is the strongest argument in favour of a Super Nova II win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS has landed in 83% of Super Nova II matches and 50% of Rīgas FS II matches, while the rate for both teams over their last 5 matches was 60%. The hosts average 1.83 goals scored per match, while the visitors concede 3.17, giving Super Nova II a strong chance of finding the net. Rīgas FS II also have attacking credentials: they average 1.33 goals scored, while the hosts concede 2.42; moreover, the visitors averaged 1.8 goals scored over their last 5 matches. The biggest risk to BTTS - Yes is that Rīgas FS II failed to score in 42% of their matches. However, the hosts’ poor defensive record and clean sheets in just 8% of their matches tip the assessment in favour of both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been surpassed in 100% of Super Nova II matches and 83% of Rīgas FS II matches. The hosts average 1.83 goals scored, while the visitors concede 3.17, pointing to significant scoring potential for Super Nova II. On the other hand, the hosts concede an average of 2.42 goals, although the visitors’ scoring potential is tempered by the fact that they have failed to score in 42% of their matches. Over their last five games, the visitors conceded an average of 3.2 goals, and Over 2.5 goals landed in 80% of their matches, compared with 60% of the hosts’ games. The 3.70-goal projection also supports higher lines, but Over 1.5 goals remains the most likely pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Super Nova II leading at the break: the hosts were ahead at half-time in 42% of matches, while Rīgas FS II were trailing at the same rate. The hosts average 1.00 goal scored before half-time, whereas the visitors concede 1.67 and fail to score in this period in 67% of matches. The case for the hosts maintaining their lead is also supported by Super Nova II’s average of 1.83 goals scored per match, compared with 3.17 goals conceded by their opponents; the visitors have lost four of their last five games. However, the 1/1 scenario is not certain, as the hosts concede an average of 1.75 goals after half-time, making a draw after leading at the break a significant alternative in the HT/FT market.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
15Shots17
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
7Shots on target8
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.82xG1.97
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
3Corners10
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
52Dangerous attacks46
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
9Fouls15
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0Cards0
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.38Goals scored / match1.58
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.5Goals conceded / match2.79
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
39%Average possession43%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
3.17Shots on target / match3.63
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.79Shots per match9.75
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
3.17Shots on target3.63
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
20.2%Shot conversion16.2%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
39%Possession43%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.14xG for1.48
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.81xG against1.75
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

Shooting quality

Super Nova II: Counter-attackingRīgas FS II: Counter-attacking
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
Accuracy (shots on target)47%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Super Nova II is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Super Nova II · 0.6 pts / match - Rīgas FS II

Super Nova II
DLDLW
Season result split
29% W33% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-9
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 2.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Rīgas FS II
LLLWL
Season result split
25% W13% D63% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-15
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-8
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS II is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Super Nova II · 1.58 goals / match - Rīgas FS II

Super Nova II is 86% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Super Nova II · 2.79 goals / match - Rīgas FS II

Super Nova II scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova II scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 24 matches).

Rīgas FS II scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS II scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).

33Goals scored (season)38
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
36Goals conceded (season)67
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
2.88Average goals in match4.38
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
7Goals scored (last 5)9
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
8Goals conceded (last 5)16
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal75%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
38%2 goals38%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
17%3 goals29%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0%4 goals13%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal88%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
38%2 goals71%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
17%3 goals54%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
4%4 goals21%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time38%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
21%Scored in both halves29%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
60%BTTS - last 560%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time79%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time42%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Super Nova II is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Super Nova II · 1.29 pts / match - Rīgas FS II

Super Nova II - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing
Rīgas FS II - half-time state
29% leading42% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.29
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)1.17
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.42Average goals (1st half)1.92
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
67%Clean sheet before half-time46%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
42%No goal before half-time42%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)1.04
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1.63
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.21Average goals (2nd half)2.46
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
46%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
63%No goal after half-time54%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

Super Nova II - second-half results

21% W50% D29% L
36
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rīgas FS II - second-half results

29% W17% D54% L
31
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-19
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 25%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Super Nova II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.40.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Rīgas FS II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match2.01.2
Average goals in match2.62.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-70
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Super Nova II
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
7
8
16-30
6
6
31-45
5
3
46-60
4
2
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Rīgas FS II
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
7
9
16-30
5
12
31-45
1
8
46-60
10
12
61-75
9
19
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Super Nova II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.67
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

Rīgas FS II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.94
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Super Nova IILigaRīgas FS II
Average goals in match▼ 2.883.71▲ 4.38
Both teams scored▲ 67%62%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%71%▲ 79%
Clean sheets• 21%21%▼ 13%
Goal before half-time▼ 71%77%▼ 75%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%83%▲ 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.71
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.04
Home goals / match
1.67
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
34%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Super Nova IIGoalGeorgijs Bombāns
  2. Rīgas FS IIGoalDuje Korač
  3. Rīgas FS IIGoalRoberts Veips

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Super Nova II 0 - 1 - 0 Rīgas FS II. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Super Nova II vs Rīgas FS II?

The 1. Liga match finished Super Nova II 2:4 Rīgas FS II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova II vs Rīgas FS II?

Super Nova II score 1.38 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS II 1.58. The 1. Liga average is 3.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Super Nova II's matches and 67% of Rīgas FS II's.

What form are Super Nova II and Rīgas FS II in?

Over the last 5 games Super Nova II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Rīgas FS II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova II vs Rīgas FS II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.