Latvia - VirsligaOlaines stadionsData current as of 23 July 2026

Super Nova vs Rīgas FS: match statistics

Super Nova crest
Super Nova
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Rīgas FS crest
Rīgas FS

Super Nova vs Rīgas FS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Super Nova play Rīgas FS in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 29 May 2026 at 19:00. Venue: Olaines stadions. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Super Nova: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Rīgas FS: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Super Nova scores 1.09 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Rīgas FS scores 2.39 and concedes 0.70. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Super Nova 61%, Rīgas FS 43%. Over 2.5: Super Nova 57%, Rīgas FS 57%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Rīgas FS has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.19. Super Nova: 9.0 shots per match, Rīgas FS: 16.0.

Match halves

Super Nova: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.52. Rīgas FS: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.30.

Goals by minute

Super Nova: 76-90+ (7 goals). Rīgas FS: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 0-0-5. Average goals 3.40, BTTS 80%.

Match description

Rīgas FS is the clear favorite: across the season they have 13 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss with a goal difference of 36–10, while Super Nova have 6 wins, 2 draws and 7 losses with a 17–21 record. In the last 5 matches the visitors have won 5 of 5, scoring 16 and conceding only 1 (avg. 3.2–0.2 per match), whereas the hosts are 2–1–2 with 6 scored and 6 conceded (1.2–1.2). Rīgas FS generates substantially more chances: on the road they average 18.29 shots and 6.57 on target per match with xG 2.17, versus Super Nova’s 8.67 shots and 3.17 on target and xG 1.08, translating to roughly double the number of high-quality opportunities. Defensively the gap is equally pronounced — Super Nova concedes 1.83 goals at home on average and have no clean sheets, while Rīgas FS concede 0.57 away and keep a clean sheet in 71% of matches. Considering Rīgas FS’s 100% away win rate and an average of 3 points per match in the last 5 versus Super Nova’s 1.4 points per match, the most likely outcome is an away win.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
Super NovaRīgas FS
3Shots18
Super NovaRīgas FS
4Shots on target8
Super NovaRīgas FS
0.68xG2.36
Super NovaRīgas FS
1Corners15
Super NovaRīgas FS
27Dangerous attacks92
Super NovaRīgas FS
13Fouls11
Super NovaRīgas FS
2Cards2
Super NovaRīgas FS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Super NovaRīgas FS
1.09Goals scored / match2.39
Super NovaRīgas FS
1.52Goals conceded / match0.7
Super NovaRīgas FS
45%Average possession62%
Super NovaRīgas FS
3.61Shots on target / match6.09
Super NovaRīgas FS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.04Shots per match16
Super NovaRīgas FS
3.61Shots on target6.09
Super NovaRīgas FS
12%Shot conversion14.9%
Super NovaRīgas FS
45%Possession62%
Super NovaRīgas FS
1.19xG for1.95
Super NovaRīgas FS
1.67xG against0.89
Super NovaRīgas FS

Shooting quality

Super Nova: Counter-attackingRīgas FS: Dominant
Super NovaRīgas FS
Accuracy (shots on target)40%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Rīgas FS is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Super Nova · 2.6 pts / match - Rīgas FS

Super Nova
LLWLW
Season result split
35% W13% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-12
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-7
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Rīgas FS
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
83% W9% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-2-2
2.57 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
11-0-1
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS is 119% better for: goals scored per match.

1.09 goals / match - Super Nova · 2.39 goals / match - Rīgas FS

Rīgas FS is 117% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.52 goals / match - Super Nova · 0.7 goals / match - Rīgas FS

Super Nova scoring profile: strong

Super Nova scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 52% (12 of 23 matches).

Rīgas FS scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

25Goals scored (season)55
Super NovaRīgas FS
35Goals conceded (season)16
Super NovaRīgas FS
2.61Average goals in match3.09
Super NovaRīgas FS
6Goals scored (last 5)13
Super NovaRīgas FS
10Goals conceded (last 5)2
Super NovaRīgas FS

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal96%
Super NovaRīgas FS
26%2 goals65%
Super NovaRīgas FS
4%3 goals43%
Super NovaRīgas FS
0%4 goals22%
Super NovaRīgas FS

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal48%
Super NovaRīgas FS
48%2 goals13%
Super NovaRīgas FS
13%3 goals9%
Super NovaRīgas FS
9%4 goals0%
Super NovaRīgas FS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time17%
Super NovaRīgas FS
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Super NovaRīgas FS
9%Scored in both halves52%
Super NovaRīgas FS

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Super NovaRīgas FS
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Super NovaRīgas FS
60%BTTS - last 540%
Super NovaRīgas FS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Super NovaRīgas FS
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Super NovaRīgas FS
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Super NovaRīgas FS

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Super NovaRīgas FS
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time61%
Super NovaRīgas FS
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Super NovaRīgas FS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS is 92% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.04 pts / match - Super Nova · 2 pts / match - Rīgas FS

Super Nova - half-time state
17% leading52% draw30% trailing
Rīgas FS - half-time state
57% leading30% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per match (1st half)2
Super NovaRīgas FS
0.57Goals scored (1st half)1.09
Super NovaRīgas FS
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
Super NovaRīgas FS
1.39Average goals (1st half)1.48
Super NovaRīgas FS
52%Clean sheet before half-time74%
Super NovaRīgas FS
57%No goal before half-time30%
Super NovaRīgas FS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per match (2nd half)2.09
Super NovaRīgas FS
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)1.3
Super NovaRīgas FS
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.3
Super NovaRīgas FS
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.61
Super NovaRīgas FS
48%Clean sheet after half-time74%
Super NovaRīgas FS
57%No goal after half-time22%
Super NovaRīgas FS

Super Nova - second-half results

35% W17% R48% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding206%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rīgas FS - second-half results

57% W39% R4% P
46
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+23
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Rīgas FS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.20
Goals scored / match1.01.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+5+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
12
31-45
4
6
46-60
1
3
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Rīgas FS
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
11
2
16-30
8
5
31-45
9
2
46-60
9
2
61-75
12
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Rīgas FS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
181%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
42%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Super NovaLigaRīgas FS
Average goals in match 2.612.98 3.09
Both teams scored 61%56% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%55% 57%
Clean sheets 22%24% 52%
Goal before half-time 61%75% 78%
Goal after half-time 87%84% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Super Nova 0 - 0 - 5 Rīgas FS. Average goals 3.40, both teams scored in 80% matches.

Rīgas FS
2 : 0
Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 3
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
4 : 1
SK Super Nova
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
2 : 1
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 2
FK Rīgas Futbola skola

FAQ

What was the result of Super Nova vs Rīgas FS?

The Virsliga match finished Super Nova 1:2 Rīgas FS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Super Nova and Rīgas FS?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Super Nova won 0, Rīgas FS won 5 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova vs Rīgas FS?

Super Nova score 1.09 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS 2.39. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Super Nova's matches and 43% of Rīgas FS's.

What form are Super Nova and Rīgas FS in?

Over the last 5 games Super Nova have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Rīgas FS 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova vs Rīgas FS?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.