Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Stadion MiejskiData current as of 31 August 2026

Swit vs Warta Sieradz: match statistics

Swit crest
Swit
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Warta Sieradz crest
Warta Sieradz

Swit vs Warta Sieradz: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Swit played Warta Sieradz in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Stadion Miejski. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Swit: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Warta Sieradz: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Swit scores 1.40 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. Warta Sieradz scores 1.60 and concedes 1.80. League average: 3.50 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Swit 40%, Warta Sieradz 60%. Over 2.5: Swit 60%, Warta Sieradz 80%. League level: BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Swit has higher xG: 2.36 vs 1.91. Swit: 10.6 shots per match, Warta Sieradz: 17.6.

Match halves

Swit: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60. Warta Sieradz: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.20.

Goals by minute

Swit: 0-15 (2 goals). Warta Sieradz: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 1: 3.50 goals per match, BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Świt hold a slight edge based on the quality of chances created: at home, they average 2.17 xG, while Warta Sieradz record 1.54 xG away from home. The hosts also take more shots (15 compared to 13.5), hit the target an average of 8 times per match, and maintain 56% possession, compared with 48% for their opponents. Both teams score an average of 2.5 goals per match, whether at home or away, but Świt convert 27% of their attempts, compared with 19% for Warta, increasing the hosts’ chances of turning their advantage into goals. Warta’s away defence is nevertheless solid, conceding an average of 0.5 goals and winning both of their two matches, so the prediction is not one-sided. In their last five matches, Świt have collected 8 points and Warta 7, and with the hosts’ clearly superior xG balance, a narrow Świt victory remains the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by Świt’s very weak seasonal defense, which concedes an average of 2.67 goals per match and has kept no clean sheets. Warta Sieradz scores an average of 2.5 goals, registers 7 shots on target per game, and has a 19% conversion rate, so they should be able to exploit the hosts’ defensive vulnerability. Świt does score only 1.0 goal per match, but creates plenty of chances: their average xG is 2.16, rising to 2.36 across their last five matches. The main risk to this scenario is Warta’s defense, which concedes only 0.5 goals per season and has kept clean sheets in 50% of matches. However, recently the team has allowed opponents an average of 1.8 goals, with an xG against of 1.67. BTTS has landed in 67% of Świt’s matches and 60% of Warta’s last five games. Combined with the league average of 64%, this gives a moderate edge to the BTTS - Yes outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to at least two goals: Świt have conceded an average of 2.67 goals in their matches so far, while Warta Sieradz have scored an average of 2.5. In their last five matches, both teams have frequently gone Over 2.5 goals, in 60% and 80% of cases respectively, compared with the league average of 64%. The hosts have created chances worth 2.36 xG across their last five appearances, while the visitors have recorded 1.91 xG, supporting a projected total close to 3.0 goals. The second-half data provides an additional argument, with the average number of goals standing at 2.67 in Świt matches and 2.5 in Warta matches. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5 goals, as Świt have cleared this line in 100% of their matches, and the visitors' attack should be able to exploit the hosts' defensive weaknesses.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Warta Sieradz has an outstanding away record, winning 100% of its matches, scoring an average of 2.5 goals and conceding just 0.5, while Świt have not won a single home match and concede 2.67 goals per game. The first half should nevertheless be evenly balanced, as Świt have been level at the break in 67% of their home matches, compared with 50% of Warta’s away fixtures; the visitors score only 0.5 goals per match before half-time. After the interval, Warta’s advantage increases significantly: they average 2.0 goals in the second half, while Świt concede as many as 2.0 goals during this period. In addition, the hosts have lost the second half in 67% of cases, whereas Warta have won every second half in their away matches so far. Świt’s recent results have been better, as they have conceded only 0.6 goals per match over their previous five games, but the visitors’ away and second-half statistics still provide the strongest support for an HT/FT draw/Warta win scenario (X/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
SwitWarta Sieradz
12Shots4
SwitWarta Sieradz
5Shots on target1
SwitWarta Sieradz
1.77xG0.88
SwitWarta Sieradz
5Corners3
SwitWarta Sieradz
90Dangerous attacks75
SwitWarta Sieradz
13Fouls19
SwitWarta Sieradz
0Cards0
SwitWarta Sieradz

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.4Goals scored / match1.6
SwitWarta Sieradz
0.6Goals conceded / match1.8
SwitWarta Sieradz
33%Average possession52%
SwitWarta Sieradz
3.8Shots on target / match6.8
SwitWarta Sieradz

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.6Shots per match17.6
SwitWarta Sieradz
3.8Shots on target6.8
SwitWarta Sieradz
13.2%Shot conversion9.1%
SwitWarta Sieradz
33%Possession52%
SwitWarta Sieradz
2.36xG for1.91
SwitWarta Sieradz
1.04xG against1.67
SwitWarta Sieradz

Shooting quality

Swit: Counter-attackingWarta Sieradz: Attacking
SwitWarta Sieradz
Accuracy (shots on target)36%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.220.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Swit is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Swit · 1.4 pts / match - Warta Sieradz

Swit
WWDLD
Season result split
40% W40% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 2.36Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Warta Sieradz
LWDWL
Season result split
40% W20% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.91Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Warta Sieradz is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Swit · 1.6 goals / match - Warta Sieradz

Swit is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.6 goals / match - Swit · 1.8 goals / match - Warta Sieradz

Swit scoring profile: strong

Swit scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Warta Sieradz keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Warta Sieradz scoring profile: mixed

Warta Sieradz scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).

7Goals scored (season)8
SwitWarta Sieradz
3Goals conceded (season)9
SwitWarta Sieradz
2Average goals in match3.4
SwitWarta Sieradz
7Goals scored (last 5)8
SwitWarta Sieradz
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
SwitWarta Sieradz

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal80%
SwitWarta Sieradz
40%2 goals40%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%3 goals20%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%4 goals20%
SwitWarta Sieradz

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal80%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%2 goals60%
SwitWarta Sieradz
0%3 goals20%
SwitWarta Sieradz
0%4 goals20%
SwitWarta Sieradz

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time20%
SwitWarta Sieradz
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%Scored in both halves20%
SwitWarta Sieradz

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
SwitWarta Sieradz
40%BTTS - last 560%
SwitWarta Sieradz

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

20%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SwitWarta Sieradz

2nd half

40%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time60%
SwitWarta Sieradz

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Swit is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - Swit · 1.2 pts / match - Warta Sieradz

Swit - half-time state
20% leading80% draw0% trailing
Warta Sieradz - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)1.2
SwitWarta Sieradz
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.4
SwitWarta Sieradz
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
SwitWarta Sieradz
0.6Average goals (1st half)0.8
SwitWarta Sieradz
100%Clean sheet before half-time60%
SwitWarta Sieradz
80%No goal before half-time60%
SwitWarta Sieradz

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per match (2nd half)1.8
SwitWarta Sieradz
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
SwitWarta Sieradz
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)1.4
SwitWarta Sieradz
0.8Average goals (2nd half)2.6
SwitWarta Sieradz
80%Clean sheet after half-time20%
SwitWarta Sieradz
60%No goal after half-time40%
SwitWarta Sieradz

Swit - second-half results

40% W60% R0% P
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Warta Sieradz - second-half results

60% W0% R40% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Swit - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal20%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Warta Sieradz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match0.82.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Swit
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Warta Sieradz
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
5
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
77%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Swit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.96
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
39%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Warta Sieradz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

SwitLigaWarta Sieradz
Average goals in match 2.003.50 3.40
Both teams scored 40%67% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%65% 80%
Clean sheets 60%20% 20%
Goal before half-time 20%65% 60%
Goal after half-time 40%77% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.50
Average goals per match
67%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.96
Home goals / match
1.54
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
17%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Bartłomiej Kręcichwost⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Warta SieradzGoalBartłomiej Kręcichwost

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Swit 0 - 0 - 2 Warta Sieradz. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Warta Sieradz
3 : 1
Swit
Swit
0 : 1
Warta Sieradz

FAQ

What was the result of Swit vs Warta Sieradz?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Swit 2:1 Warta Sieradz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Swit and Warta Sieradz?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Swit won 0, Warta Sieradz won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Swit vs Warta Sieradz?

Swit score 1.40 goals per game on average and Warta Sieradz 1.60. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Swit's matches and 60% of Warta Sieradz's.

What form are Swit and Warta Sieradz in?

Over the last 5 games Swit have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Warta Sieradz 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Swit vs Warta Sieradz?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.