United States - MLS Next ProCheney StadiumData current as of 08 September 2026

Tacoma Defiance vs Portland Timbers II: match statistics

Tacoma Defiance vs Portland Timbers II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tacoma Defiance played Portland Timbers II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 6 July 2026. Venue: Cheney Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Tacoma Defiance: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Portland Timbers II: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tacoma Defiance scores 1.13 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Portland Timbers II scores 1.31 and concedes 1.38. League average: 3.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tacoma Defiance 44%, Portland Timbers II 38%. Over 2.5: Tacoma Defiance 56%, Portland Timbers II 56%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Portland Timbers II has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.40. Tacoma Defiance: 12.0 shots per match, Portland Timbers II: 14.8.

Match halves

Tacoma Defiance: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.75. Portland Timbers II: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.94.

Goals by minute

Tacoma Defiance: 46-60 (7 goals). Portland Timbers II: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-4. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Portland Timbers II hold a clear advantage in standings and form: they sit 8th vs 20th Tacoma, have 8 wins this season vs 5 for the hosts, and boast a 71% away win rate vs Tacoma’s 44% home win rate. The visitors have scored 21 goals this season (7 in the last 5 matches) vs Tacoma’s 18 (6 in the last 5), and the share of goalless matches is 14% for Portland vs 33% for Tacoma, indicating greater offensive consistency from the visitors. Tacoma, however, have a solid home defense, conceding only 0.89 goals per home match vs Portland’s 1.29 conceded on the road, while average xG are 1.45 for Tacoma at home and 1.33 for Portland away. Tacoma attempt more shots (12.33 with 4.67 on target at home vs 11.14 and 4.14 for Portland) but convert less efficiently (10% vs 12%), so the hosts’ attacking activity does not translate into goals as effectively. Considering Portland’s higher table position, better away record and lower share of goalless matches, I tip a Portland win; estimated probabilities: 45% for the visitors, 30% for the hosts and 25% for a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Portland Timbers II have only 14% of matches with BTTS - Yes, while 71% of their games end with a clean sheet expected, a strong signal against BTTS. Tacoma record BTTS - Yes at home in 56% of matches and generate significantly more chances (xG 2.06, avg 17.67 shots and 6.56 shots on target) than Portland (xG 1.33, 11.14 shots and 4.14 shots on target), so the hosts have a real chance to score. Still, season-long goals conceded averages are similar (Tacoma 1.44 goals conceded per match vs Portland 1.29), and the high clean sheet rate for the visitors (71%) strongly limits the probability of Goal/Goal. In the last 5 matches both teams had BTTS - Yes at 40% each, with Tacoma conceding 0.8 goals and Portland 1.4 goals per game, which shows short-term form does not break the season trend. Based on this I assess BTTS - Yes probability at 30% versus 70% for No Goal and recommend backing No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-and-defense model projects total expected goals around 3.12: Tacoma Defiance 1.75 (attacking xG 2.06 vs Portland defense xG 1.44) and Portland Timbers II 1.37 (attacking xG 1.33 vs Tacoma defense xG 1.40). Season-long metrics support Over 2.5 – Tacoma has exceeded 2.5 goals in 67% of home matches, the league records 65% of games over 2.5, and Portland 43%, which increases the probability of crossing the 2.5 line. Tacoma generates on average 17.67 shots and 6.56 on target with an 8% conversion rate, hence a large xG (2.06) despite a lower goals-per-game average of 1.33; this indicates potential for multiple goals. Portland shows lower activity (11.14 shots, 4.14 on target) and only 14% of matches with both teams scoring, so Tacoma should be the main goal driver. Therefore the strongest signal is a bet on Over 2.5 (total xG 3.12, high Tacoma over-2.5 frequency 67% and high league rate 65%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Portland Timbers II appear to be the favorite: they have a 71% win rate this season versus Tacoma’s 33% and average 2.14 points per match compared to the home side’s 1.44, which strongly supports their victory. The visitors also average 1.43 points at half-time versus the hosts’ 0.78 and lead at the break in 29% of matches while the hosts do so in only 11%, so the most reliable signal is the visitors leading at half-time. Tacoma’s case is supported by a higher xG (2.06 vs 1.33), more shots (17.67 vs 11.14) and 6.56 shots on target versus 4.14, and the home side score on average 1.78 goals in the second half and 1.0 goals after the break, which increases the probability of a turnaround after half-time. Despite that, Portland keep a clean sheet in 71% of games and only 14% of their matches see both teams score, therefore the strongest, most certain scenario is an away win to nil (2/2), with significant backing for X/2 as an alternative (draw at half-time, away win full-time).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
5Shots11
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
3Shots on target5
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
0.85xG1.28
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
5Corners4
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
43Dangerous attacks32
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
14Fouls14
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
3Cards0
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
1.13Goals scored / match1.31
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
1.38Goals conceded / match1.38
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
45%Average possession46%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
4Shots on target / match5.5
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match14.81
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
4Shots on target5.5
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
9.4%Shot conversion8.9%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
45%Possession46%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
1.4xG for1.74
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
1.53xG against1.42
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II

Shooting quality

Tacoma Defiance: BalancedPortland Timbers II: Attacking
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
Accuracy (shots on target)33%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tacoma Defiance is 11% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Tacoma Defiance · 1.8 pts / match - Portland Timbers II

Tacoma Defiance
WLWWD
Season result split
31% W25% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-7
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Portland Timbers II
WWLWL
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-4
1.75 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-0-2
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Portland Timbers II is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.13 goals / match - Tacoma Defiance · 1.31 goals / match - Portland Timbers II

Tacoma Defiance scoring profile: mixed

Tacoma Defiance scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Portland Timbers II keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 matches).

Portland Timbers II scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers II scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Tacoma Defiance keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

18Goals scored (season)21
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
22Goals conceded (season)22
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
2.5Average goals in match2.69
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
6Goals scored (last 5)7
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal75%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
38%2 goals44%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
6%3 goals13%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
6%4 goals0%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal50%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
44%2 goals38%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
13%3 goals31%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
6%4 goals13%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
Portland Timbers II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 16 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time19%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
13%BTTS in both halves13%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
19%Scored in both halves19%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
40%BTTS - last 540%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Portland Timbers II is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.94 pts / match - Tacoma Defiance · 1.06 pts / match - Portland Timbers II

Tacoma Defiance - half-time state
13% leading56% draw31% trailing
Portland Timbers II - half-time state
19% leading50% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.94Points per match (1st half)1.06
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
0.94Average goals (1st half)1
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
50%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
75%No goal before half-time63%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)1.75
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.94
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.69
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
44%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II
44%No goal after half-time44%
Tacoma DefiancePortland Timbers II

Tacoma Defiance - second-half results

31% W38% R31% P
15
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding238%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Portland Timbers II - second-half results

50% W25% R25% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding263%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tacoma Defiance - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Portland Timbers II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tacoma Defiance
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
2
16-30
2
4
31-45
7
2
46-60
2
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Portland Timbers II
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
0
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
4
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
80%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tacoma Defiance

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.81
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Portland Timbers II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Tacoma DefianceLigaPortland Timbers II
Average goals in match 2.503.25 2.69
Both teams scored 44%62% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%66% 56%
Clean sheets 25%21% 50%
Goal before half-time 56%76% 63%
Goal after half-time 81%84% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tacoma DefianceYellow cardRafael Jauregui
  2. Tacoma DefianceSubstitutionOn: Omar HassanOff: Rafael Jauregui
  3. Portland Timbers IIGoalEric Izoita
  4. Tacoma DefianceYellow cardMark O'Neill
  5. Portland Timbers IIGoalDaniel Cervantes
  6. Tacoma DefianceYellow cardMark O'Neill
  7. Tacoma DefianceSubstitutionOn: Daniel RoblesOff: Xavi Gnaulati

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Tacoma Defiance 0 - 0 - 4 Portland Timbers II. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Portland Timbers II
1 : 0
Tacoma Defiance
Portland Timbers II
2 : 1
Tacoma Defiance
Tacoma Defiance
1 : 2
Portland Timbers II
Portland Timbers II
2 : 1
Tacoma Defiance

FAQ

What was the result of Tacoma Defiance vs Portland Timbers II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Tacoma Defiance 0:2 Portland Timbers II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tacoma Defiance and Portland Timbers II?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Tacoma Defiance won 0, Portland Timbers II won 4 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tacoma Defiance vs Portland Timbers II?

Tacoma Defiance score 1.13 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers II 1.31. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Tacoma Defiance's matches and 38% of Portland Timbers II's.

What form are Tacoma Defiance and Portland Timbers II in?

Over the last 5 games Tacoma Defiance have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Portland Timbers II 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tacoma Defiance vs Portland Timbers II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tacoma Defiance vs Portland Timbers II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.