United States - USL ChampionshipAl Lang StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Charleston Battery: match statistics

Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Charleston Battery: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tampa Bay Rowdies played Charleston Battery in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 10 June 2026. Venue: Al Lang Stadium. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Tampa Bay Rowdies: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Charleston Battery: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tampa Bay Rowdies scores 1.73 and concedes 0.45 goals per match. Charleston Battery scores 1.40 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tampa Bay Rowdies 36%, Charleston Battery 30%. Over 2.5: Tampa Bay Rowdies 36%, Charleston Battery 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Tampa Bay Rowdies has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.53. Tampa Bay Rowdies: 14.6 shots per match, Charleston Battery: 12.0.

Match halves

Tampa Bay Rowdies: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.91. Charleston Battery: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Tampa Bay Rowdies: 76-90+ (7 goals). Charleston Battery: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-4. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tampa Bay Rowdies as hosts display markedly superior metrics: at home they have 8 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, scoring an average of 2.4 goals per game and conceding 0.6, yielding a goal difference of +9 and 60% clean sheets. Charleston Battery away form is poor — they win only 20% of such matches, average 0.4 goals scored and concede 1.8, with 80% of away games without scoring and a goal difference of -7 on the road. The gap in chance creation is significant: Rowdies average 15.4 shots and 6.4 on target per home match with xG 1.76, while Charleston register 9.2 shots and 3.2 on target with xG 1.25 away, but a low conversion rate of 4% means chances do not translate into goals. Additionally Tampa Bay have won 5 of their last 5 matches overall and scored 12 goals while conceding just 1 in their last 5 home games, whereas the visitors have a last-5 away record of 1 win and 4 losses, indicating a trend favoring the hosts. Based on this I predict a home win; I assess probabilities as 80% for a Tampa Bay triumph, 12% for a draw and 8% for a Charleston win, primarily due to the advantage in shots on target (6.4 vs 3.2), conversion rate (16% vs 4%) and superior clean sheet rate (60% vs 20%).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict no BTTS (No), because Tampa Bay averages 2.4 goals per match with xG 1.88, while Charleston has a season average of only 0.4 goals with xG 1.25, creating a clear offensive advantage for the home side. Tampa averages 14.6 shots with 6.8 on target and a 16% conversion rate, whereas the visitors record 9.2 shots, 3.2 on target and only a 4% conversion, so Charleston’s real finishing ability is very limited. Additionally, Tampa have 40% clean sheets and concede 0.8 goals per game, while Charleston concedes 1.8 and have a season BTTS of 0% (BTTS in the last 5 away matches also 0%), which increases the likelihood that at least one team will fail to score. Although the league BTTS level is 54% and home-season BTTS is 60%, only 20% of Tampa’s last 5 matches featured BTTS, so combining the 2.4 vs 0.4 goal averages and Charleston’s 4% conversion, I back 'No' with confidence.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG, I expect 1.69 goals for Tampa (xG_for 1.88 and opponent xG_against 1.50 → average 1.69) and 1.14 goals for Charleston (xG_for 1.25 and home xG_against 1.03 → average 1.14), giving a total of 2.83 expected goals. Tampa averages 2.4 goals at home and generates 14.6 shots (6.8 on target), while Charleston scores 0.4 goals away and registers only 3.2 shots on target — this highlights the hosts’ offensive edge and a higher probability of goals. Seasonal percentages confirm the direction: Tampa has 100% of home matches over 1.5 goals, Charleston 60% — therefore I rate Over 1.5 at 92% probability. The 2.5 line moderately favors the Over (approx. 68%) since season Over25 is 60% for Tampa and 40% for Charleston and the combined xG 2.83 exceeds 2.5. The 3.5 line is less likely (Over ~28%), so the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Tampa Bay Rowdies are clear favorites: season averages are 2.4 goals per match for the home side versus 0.4 for Charleston, with win rates of 80% vs 20% and xG of 1.88 compared to 1.25 for the visitors. At Half-Time the hosts average 1.2 goals and lead at the break in 60% of matches, while the visitors have 0.2 goals at Half-Time and lead at the break in only 20%, which indicates a high probability of a lead at the break. Additionally, Tampa records 6.8 shots on target and a 16% conversion rate versus 3.2 and 4% for the visitors, and in the last five matches the hosts were leading at Half-Time in 80% and won all five (100%), demonstrating that leads at the break convert into Full-Time wins. On this basis the safest HT/FT is 1/1 (approx. 54%); alternatives are X/1 (12%) or 1/X (6%), and a turnaround or a win for the visitors is assessed as unlikely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
12Shots11
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
5Shots on target5
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
1.46xG1.43
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
5Corners3
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
49Dangerous attacks53
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
20Fouls10
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
4Cards1
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
1.73Goals scored / match1.4
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0.45Goals conceded / match1.3
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
52%Average possession56%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
4.64Shots on target / match5
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.55Shots per match12
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
4.64Shots on target5
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
11.9%Shot conversion11.7%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
52%Possession56%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
1.63xG for1.53
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
1.04xG against1.29
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

Shooting quality

Tampa Bay Rowdies: AttackingCharleston Battery: Balanced
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
Accuracy (shots on target)32%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 86% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 1.4 pts / match - Charleston Battery

Tampa Bay Rowdies
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
73% W27% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-0
2.45 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Charleston Battery
DLWLW
Season result split
50% W10% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-4
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-4
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

1.73 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 1.4 goals / match - Charleston Battery

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 189% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.45 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 1.3 goals / match - Charleston Battery

Tampa Bay Rowdies scoring profile: very strong

Tampa Bay Rowdies scores in 100% of matches (11 of 11 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

Charleston Battery scoring profile: more difficult

Charleston Battery scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Tampa Bay Rowdies keeps a clean sheet in 64% (7 of 11 matches).

19Goals scored (season)14
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
5Goals conceded (season)13
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
2.18Average goals in match2.7
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
1Goals conceded (last 5)6
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal60%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
45%2 goals50%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
27%3 goals20%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0%4 goals10%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

How often they concede at least...

36%1 goal70%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
9%2 goals30%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0%3 goals20%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0%4 goals10%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

36%
Tampa Bay Rowdies - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.4 of 11 matches
30%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.3 of 10 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time0%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
18%Scored in both halves30%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS30%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
20%BTTS - last 520%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.09 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 1.6 pts / match - Charleston Battery

Tampa Bay Rowdies - half-time state
55% leading45% draw0% trailing
Charleston Battery - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.09Points per match (1st half)1.6
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0.82Goals scored (1st half)0.7
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0.09Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0.91Average goals (1st half)1.1
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
91%Clean sheet before half-time80%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
45%No goal before half-time60%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

After half-time (2nd half)

1.91Points per match (2nd half)1.2
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0.36Goals conceded (2nd half)0.9
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.6
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
64%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
36%No goal after half-time50%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

Tampa Bay Rowdies - second-half results

55% W27% R18% P
23
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Charleston Battery - second-half results

30% W30% R40% P
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tampa Bay Rowdies - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.60
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+5+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.01.2
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+5-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tampa Bay Rowdies
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
3
0
31-45
3
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
2
16-30
3
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
5
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tampa Bay Rowdies

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
39%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Tampa Bay RowdiesLigaCharleston Battery
Average goals in match 2.182.74 2.70
Both teams scored 36%54% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%53% 50%
Clean sheets 64%28% 30%
Goal before half-time 55%68% 60%
Goal after half-time 82%78% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Charleston BatteryYellow cardEmilio Ycaza
  2. Tampa Bay RowdiesGoalLouis Perez
  3. Tampa Bay RowdiesYellow cardDion Acoff
  4. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Kirill PakhomovOff: Chris Allan
  5. Tampa Bay RowdiesSubstitutionOn: Russell CiceroneOff: Marco Micaletto
  6. Charleston BatteryGoalMaalique Nathanael Foster
  7. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Colton SwanOff: Maalique Nathanael Foster
  8. Tampa Bay RowdiesYellow cardMax Schneider
  9. Tampa Bay RowdiesYellow cardRussell Cicerone
  10. Tampa Bay RowdiesSubstitutionOn: Evan ConwayOff: Matthew Dyan Myers
  11. Charleston BatteryGoalColton SwanAssist: Miguel Berry
  12. Tampa Bay RowdiesSubstitutionOn: Pedro DolabellaOff: Dion Acoff
  13. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Alec HughesOff: Jeremy Kelley
  14. Tampa Bay RowdiesYellow cardNathan Dossantos

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Tampa Bay Rowdies 1 - 1 - 4 Charleston Battery. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Charleston Battery
1 : 1
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Tampa Bay Rowdies
1 : 3
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
2 : 1
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Charleston Battery
2 : 1
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Charleston Battery
3 : 1
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Tampa Bay Rowdies
4 : 2
Charleston Battery

FAQ

What was the result of Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Charleston Battery?

The USL Championship match finished Tampa Bay Rowdies 2:2 Charleston Battery. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tampa Bay Rowdies and Charleston Battery?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Tampa Bay Rowdies won 1, Charleston Battery won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Charleston Battery?

Tampa Bay Rowdies score 1.73 goals per game on average and Charleston Battery 1.40. The USL Championship average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Tampa Bay Rowdies's matches and 30% of Charleston Battery's.

What form are Tampa Bay Rowdies and Charleston Battery in?

Over the last 5 games Tampa Bay Rowdies have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Charleston Battery 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Charleston Battery?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Charleston Battery: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.