Tanjong Pagar vs Hougang United: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Tanjong Pagar vs Hougang United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tanjong Pagar play Hougang United in S.League (Singapore). The match date is 16 October 2026. Venue: Jurong East Stadium.
Current form
Tanjong Pagar: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match. Hougang United: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tanjong Pagar scores 1.33 and concedes 2.67 goals per match. Hougang United scores 1.00 and concedes 2.33. League average: 4.09 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tanjong Pagar 33%, Hougang United 67%. Over 2.5: Tanjong Pagar 67%, Hougang United 100%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 82%.
xG, shots and style
Hougang United has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.22. Tanjong Pagar: 9.0 shots per match, Hougang United: 12.0.
Match halves
Tanjong Pagar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. Hougang United: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.00.
Goals by minute
Tanjong Pagar: 46-60 (2 goals). Hougang United: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
S.League: 4.09 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 82%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tanjong Pagar | Hougang United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 56% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.15 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tanjong Pagar is 203% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Tanjong Pagar · 0.33 pts / match - Hougang United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tanjong Pagar is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar · 1 goals / match - Hougang United
Hougang United is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.67 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar · 2.33 goals / match - Hougang United
Tanjong Pagar scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Hougang United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).
Hougang United scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Tanjong Pagar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tanjong Pagar
Over / Under - Hougang United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hougang United is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / match - Tanjong Pagar · 1 pts / match - Hougang United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tanjong Pagar - second-half results
Concedes 1.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Hougang United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.67 | 1.33 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 67% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 33% |
| No goal | 67% | 67% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.33 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.7 | 0.7 |
| Average goals in match | 2.7 | 0.7 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 67% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tanjong Pagar
Hougang United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (S.League).
Teams vs league
| Tanjong Pagar | Liga | Hougang United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 4.00 | 4.09 | ▼ 3.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 55% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 67% | 82% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 23% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 91% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 82% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Tanjong Pagar 1 - 0 - 2 Hougang United. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
When do Tanjong Pagar and Hougang United play?
Tanjong Pagar face Hougang United on 16 October 2026 in S.League at Jurong East Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tanjong Pagar and Hougang United?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Tanjong Pagar won 1, Hougang United won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tanjong Pagar vs Hougang United?
Tanjong Pagar score 1.33 goals per game on average and Hougang United 1.00. The S.League average is 4.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 82% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Tanjong Pagar's matches and 67% of Hougang United's.
What form are Tanjong Pagar and Hougang United in?
Over the last 5 games Tanjong Pagar have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Hougang United 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanjong Pagar vs Hougang United?
The statistical background for Tanjong Pagar vs Hougang United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.