Egypt - Second DivisionTanta StadiumData current as of 16 October 2026

Tanta SC vs Masar: match statistics

Tanta SC crest
Tanta SC
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Masar crest
Masar

Tanta SC vs Masar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tanta SC played Masar in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Venue: Tanta Stadium. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Tanta SC: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. Masar: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tanta SC scores 1.00 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Masar scores 3.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 1.88 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tanta SC 50%, Masar 50%. Over 2.5: Tanta SC 50%, Masar 100%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Masar has higher xG: 2.14 vs 1.37. Tanta SC: 10.5 shots per match, Masar: 9.0.

Match halves

Tanta SC: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. Masar: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 3.00.

Goals by minute

Tanta SC: 46-60 (1 goals). Masar: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.88 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Masar lead the table and have won both of their league matches so far, scoring 7 goals and conceding just 1, while Tanta SC have recorded 1 win and 1 draw. The visitors are also slightly more effective when considering their broader form: in their last five matches, they have scored 12 goals and secured 3 wins, while the hosts have netted 9 times, winning 2 and drawing 3. Tanta SC nevertheless create solid chances at home, averaging 1.71 xG, 13 shots and 7 shots on target per match, so they should pose an attacking threat. Both teams’ defences have conceded 5 goals in their last five outings, while the hosts allow opponents an average xG of 1.28, giving the league leaders a realistic chance of scoring. Masar’s advantage in results, league position and an average of 3 goals scored in away matches points to a narrow victory, although a draw remains a serious possibility.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - No pick is primarily supported by the home side’s profile: in the current campaign, they have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their matches, conceding an average of 0.0 goals. Tanta have allowed opponents just 0.53 xG, while Masar’s available away data shows no attacking xG value created, and they have produced only 0.54 xG per match across their last five games. The visitors have been effective in terms of results, averaging 2.4 goals scored in their last five appearances, but their BTTS rate during this period is only 40%, indicating frequent matches in which just one side scores. The hosts have recently averaged 1.8 goals and recorded an 80% BTTS rate, but the league has a low 40% rate of both teams scoring, along with as many as 85% clean sheets. The most likely scenario is therefore one in which Tanta score, but at least one team—particularly Masar—fails to find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have cleared the 1.5-goal line in 100% of their matches so far this season, although the limited sample size should be taken into account. In their last five matches, Tanta averaged 1.8 goals and Masar 2.4, while both teams conceded 1.0 goal per game. During this period, Tanta created chances worth an average of 1.37 xG, whereas their opponents allowed just 0.59 xG, which limits confidence in a high-scoring game. Despite the low league average of 1.85 goals, Masar’s matches finished Over 2.5 goals in 80% of their last five outings, while Tanta reached this line in 60%. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5: the projected total of 2.55 goals clearly favors this option, without requiring at least three goals to be scored.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Masar victory at the final whistle, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches. Tanta averaged 0.6 goals scored and conceded before the break, while Masar also averaged 0.6 goals scored but allowed opponents only 0.2. After the break, the visitors appear more potent offensively, averaging 1.8 goals compared with Tanta’s 1.2, and goals were scored in the second half in all five of Masar’s most recent matches. Masar won 60% of their last five matches, whereas Tanta drew as many as 60% of theirs, reinforcing the assessment that an evenly balanced opening could turn into a late advantage for the visitors.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Tanta SCMasar
4Shots13
Tanta SCMasar
1Shots on target6
Tanta SCMasar
0.71xG1.66
Tanta SCMasar
4Corners6
Tanta SCMasar
48Dangerous attacks52
Tanta SCMasar
15Fouls12
Tanta SCMasar
0Cards0
Tanta SCMasar

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match3.5
Tanta SCMasar
0.5Goals conceded / match0.5
Tanta SCMasar
51%Average possession30%
Tanta SCMasar
4.5Shots on target / match3.5
Tanta SCMasar

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.5Shots per match9
Tanta SCMasar
4.5Shots on target3.5
Tanta SCMasar
9.5%Shot conversion38.9%
Tanta SCMasar
51%Possession30%
Tanta SCMasar
1.37xG for2.14
Tanta SCMasar
1.18xG against0.53
Tanta SCMasar

Shooting quality

Tanta SC: BalancedMasar: Counter-attacking
Tanta SCMasar
Accuracy (shots on target)43%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.24
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.221.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Masar is 50% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Tanta SC · 3 pts / match - Masar

Tanta SC
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Masar
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 2.14Opponent xG: 0.53BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masar is 250% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Tanta SC · 3.5 goals / match - Masar

Tanta SC scoring profile: mixed

Tanta SC scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Masar scoring profile: very strong

Masar scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

2Goals scored (season)7
Tanta SCMasar
1Goals conceded (season)1
Tanta SCMasar
1.5Average goals in match4
Tanta SCMasar
2Goals scored (last 5)7
Tanta SCMasar
1Goals conceded (last 5)1
Tanta SCMasar

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
Tanta SCMasar
50%2 goals100%
Tanta SCMasar
0%3 goals100%
Tanta SCMasar
0%4 goals50%
Tanta SCMasar

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
Tanta SCMasar
0%2 goals0%
Tanta SCMasar
0%3 goals0%
Tanta SCMasar
0%4 goals0%
Tanta SCMasar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Tanta SCMasar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tanta SCMasar
0%Scored in both halves50%
Tanta SCMasar

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Tanta SCMasar
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS50%
Tanta SCMasar
50%BTTS - last 550%
Tanta SCMasar

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Tanta SCMasar
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Tanta SCMasar
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Tanta SCMasar

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Tanta SCMasar
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Tanta SCMasar
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time100%
Tanta SCMasar

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masar is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Tanta SC · 2 pts / match - Masar

Tanta SC - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Masar - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)2
Tanta SCMasar
0Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Tanta SCMasar
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0
Tanta SCMasar
0.5Average goals (1st half)0.5
Tanta SCMasar
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Tanta SCMasar
100%No goal before half-time50%
Tanta SCMasar

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)3
Tanta SCMasar
1Goals scored (2nd half)3
Tanta SCMasar
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Tanta SCMasar
1Average goals (2nd half)3.5
Tanta SCMasar
100%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Tanta SCMasar
50%No goal after half-time0%
Tanta SCMasar

Tanta SC - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Masar - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tanta SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.502.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.0
Average goals in match0.51.0
1 goal50%50%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Masar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.003.00
Goals scored / match0.53.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.5
Average goals in match0.53.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%100%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tanta SC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Masar
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
4
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
146%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tanta SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Masar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
438%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+2.5
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Tanta SCLigaMasar
Average goals in match▼ 1.501.88▲ 4.00
Both teams scored▲ 50%40%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%32%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▲ 50%40%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▲ 50%48%▲ 50%
Goal after half-time▼ 50%72%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.88
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
1.08
Home goals / match
0.80
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
48%
1 goal
12%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Tanta SC 0 - 1 - 1 Masar. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Masar
0 : 0
Tanta SC
Tanta SC
0 : 2
Masar

FAQ

What was the result of Tanta SC vs Masar?

The Second Division match finished Tanta SC 0:1 Masar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tanta SC and Masar?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tanta SC won 0, Masar won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tanta SC vs Masar?

Tanta SC score 1.00 goals per game on average and Masar 3.50. The Second Division average is 1.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Tanta SC's matches and 50% of Masar's.

What form are Tanta SC and Masar in?

Over the last 5 games Tanta SC have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Masar 2-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanta SC vs Masar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.