Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraSokoine StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar: match statistics

Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tanzania Prisons play Mtibwa Sugar in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 27 June 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Sokoine Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Tanzania Prisons: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Mtibwa Sugar: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tanzania Prisons scores 0.72 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.83 and concedes 1.60. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tanzania Prisons 31%, Mtibwa Sugar 50%. Over 2.5: Tanzania Prisons 38%, Mtibwa Sugar 53%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Mtibwa Sugar has higher xG: 1.00 vs 0.95. Tanzania Prisons: 3.6 shots per match, Mtibwa Sugar: 3.5.

Match halves

Tanzania Prisons: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.38. Mtibwa Sugar: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Tanzania Prisons: 0-15 (6 goals). Mtibwa Sugar: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Tanzania Prisons are favorites on paper: at home they score an average of 0.79 goals and concede 1.21 per match, while Mtibwa Sugar on the road records only 0.31 scored and 1.62 conceded. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 8 goals in those games, also averaging 1.8 points in their last five; the visitors haven’t won any of their last 5 (0 wins, 1 draw) and average just 0.2 points. Mtibwa attempt more shots (4.78 average and 2.11 on target away), but their conversion rate is only 5% and they fail to score in 69% of away matches, whereas the hosts have a 26% conversion on 3.17 shots. It’s also notable that offensive xG is similar (0.79 vs 0.87), but Mtibwa are exposed to worse opposing chances (average xG against 1.78 versus 1.10 for the hosts) and have a poorer away goal difference (-17 vs -6 for the hosts). Given better form (3 wins vs 0), higher efficiency and a more stable home defense, I back Tanzania Prisons to win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
-1Shots-1
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
-1Shots on target-1
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0xG0
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
-1Corners-1
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0Dangerous attacks0
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
-1Fouls-1
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
-1Cards-1
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.72Goals scored / match0.83
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
1.31Goals conceded / match1.6
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
35%Average possession29%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
1.13Shots on target / match1.2
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.63Shots per match3.5
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
1.13Shots on target1.2
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
19.8%Shot conversion23.8%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
35%Possession29%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.95xG for1
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
1.29xG against1.58
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

Shooting quality

Tanzania Prisons: Counter-attackingMtibwa Sugar: Counter-attacking
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
Accuracy (shots on target)31%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.260.29
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.640.69

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tanzania Prisons
LWWLD
Season result split
28% W19% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-17
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-6
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.87Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Mtibwa Sugar
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W30% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-15
0.90 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-5-10
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 0.85Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mtibwa Sugar is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

0.72 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons · 0.83 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Tanzania Prisons is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.31 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons · 1.6 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Tanzania Prisons scoring profile: strong

Tanzania Prisons scores in 47% of matches (15 of 32 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

Mtibwa Sugar scoring profile: strong

Mtibwa Sugar scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Tanzania Prisons keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).

23Goals scored (season)25
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
42Goals conceded (season)48
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
2.03Average goals in match2.43
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
4Goals scored (last 5)2
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
6Goals conceded (last 5)12
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

How often they score at least...

47%1 goal57%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
16%2 goals20%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
9%3 goals3%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0%4 goals3%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal80%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
41%2 goals47%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
16%3 goals27%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
6%4 goals7%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

31%
Tanzania Prisons - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 32 matches
35%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time23%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
6%Scored in both halves17%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
40%BTTS - last 540%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tanzania Prisons is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.03 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons · 0.67 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Tanzania Prisons - half-time state
16% leading56% draw28% trailing
Mtibwa Sugar - half-time state
7% leading47% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.03Points per match (1st half)0.67
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.97Average goals (1st half)1.2
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
56%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
69%No goal before half-time70%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

After half-time (2nd half)

0.97Points per match (2nd half)1.03
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.97Average goals (2nd half)1.17
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
56%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
78%No goal after half-time60%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

Tanzania Prisons - second-half results

16% W50% R34% P
33
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding175%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results

23% W33% R43% P
20
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-16
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding286%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tanzania Prisons - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.80
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal20%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Mtibwa Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.20
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.4
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-4-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tanzania Prisons
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
1
5
16-30
4
10
31-45
2
5
46-60
5
7
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Mtibwa Sugar
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
1
6
16-30
7
11
31-45
3
8
46-60
2
5
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
27%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
23%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tanzania Prisons

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Mtibwa Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Tanzania PrisonsLigaMtibwa Sugar
Average goals in match 2.032.17 2.43
Both teams scored 31%35% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%39% 53%
Clean sheets 31%39% 20%
Goal before half-time 56%60% 73%
Goal after half-time 56%63% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tanzania Prisons 0 - 0 - 1 Mtibwa Sugar. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Tanzania Prisons 2:1 Mtibwa Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar?

Tanzania Prisons score 0.72 goals per game on average and Mtibwa Sugar 0.83. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Tanzania Prisons's matches and 50% of Mtibwa Sugar's.

What form are Tanzania Prisons and Mtibwa Sugar in?

Over the last 5 games Tanzania Prisons have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Mtibwa Sugar 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.