Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar: match statistics
Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tanzania Prisons played Mtibwa Sugar in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 27 June 2026. Venue: Sokoine Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Tanzania Prisons: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Mtibwa Sugar: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tanzania Prisons scores 0.71 and concedes 1.39 goals per match. Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.82 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tanzania Prisons 32%, Mtibwa Sugar 46%. Over 2.5: Tanzania Prisons 39%, Mtibwa Sugar 50%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Mtibwa Sugar has higher xG: 0.98 vs 0.94. Tanzania Prisons: 4.0 shots per match, Mtibwa Sugar: 3.4.
Match halves
Tanzania Prisons: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.32. Mtibwa Sugar: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.43.
Goals by minute
Tanzania Prisons: 0-15 (6 goals). Mtibwa Sugar: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tanzania Prisons are favorites on paper: at home they score an average of 0.79 goals and concede 1.21 per match, while Mtibwa Sugar on the road records only 0.31 scored and 1.62 conceded. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 8 goals in those games, also averaging 1.8 points in their last five; the visitors haven’t won any of their last 5 (0 wins, 1 draw) and average just 0.2 points. Mtibwa attempt more shots (4.78 average and 2.11 on target away), but their conversion rate is only 5% and they fail to score in 69% of away matches, whereas the hosts have a 26% conversion on 3.17 shots. It’s also notable that offensive xG is similar (0.79 vs 0.87), but Mtibwa are exposed to worse opposing chances (average xG against 1.78 versus 1.10 for the hosts) and have a poorer away goal difference (-17 vs -6 for the hosts). Given better form (3 wins vs 0), higher efficiency and a more stable home defense, I back Tanzania Prisons to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The "No" scenario is more likely because Mtibwa Sugar failed to score in 69% of matches this season and averages only 0.31 goals per game, which significantly reduces the chance of BTTS. Tanzania Prisons average 1.27 goals and have an xG of 1.09, so the home side will likely find the net, but BTTS also requires a goal from the visitors; the hosts concede 1.53 goals per game on average, which partly balances the odds. In the last 5 matches Mtibwa scored 0.6 goals and had BTTS in 40% of games, while Tanzania scored 1.6 in that period and had BTTS in 60% — this shows the visitors’ offensive edge and the home side’s limited effectiveness. Shot conversion 13% versus 5% and a league BTTS rate of 35% with 78% of matches featuring a clean sheet further argue for a low probability of both teams scoring, hence an assessment of 70% for "No" and 30% for "BTTS - Yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG (xg_for_avg_home = 1.09 and xg_against_avg_away = 1.78) I forecast 1.44 goals for Tanzania Prisons, and with xg_for_avg_away = 0.87 and xg_against_avg_home = 1.31 I forecast 1.09 for Mtibwa; total expected goals = 2.53. A Poisson distribution on this mean implies roughly a 72% probability of Over 1.5 goals, supported by seasonal over1.5 rates: 80% for the home side and 62% for the away side. The 2.5 line is less certain — the model gives ~46% for Over 2.5 (Under 54%); although the home team has 60% of matches >2.5 this season, the away team only 38%, so there is no clear edge. The hosts average 6.78 shots with a 13% conversion rate (vs 4.78 and 5% for Mtibwa) and have scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches (1.6 avg) versus 3 for the visitors (0.6), which strengthens the goal-scoring scenario on the home side. In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommended), while Over 2.5 is borderline and Over 3.5 has low probability (~25%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1 – Tanzania Prisons to lead at the break and the hosts to win at Full-Time. The hosts average 1.27 goals per match versus 0.31 for Mtibwa Sugar, and in the last 5 fixtures the hosts have won 3 of 5 (60%) while the visitors have recorded no wins (0%). Tanzania Prisons also have higher xG (1.09 vs 0.87), attempt more shots (6.78 vs 4.78) and convert them far better (13% vs 5%), while the visitors concede more xG (1.78) than the hosts (1.31). By Half-Time the hosts average 0.5 goals versus 0.15 for the visitors, and 86% of the hosts’ matches featured over 0.5 goals at the break, which reinforces the prediction of the hosts leading at Half-Time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tanzania Prisons | Mtibwa Sugar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.24 | 0.29 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.51 | 0.74 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tanzania Prisons is 800% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons · 0.2 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mtibwa Sugar is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
0.71 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons · 0.82 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar
Tanzania Prisons is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.39 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons · 1.57 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar
Tanzania Prisons scores in 46% of matches (13 of 28 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 matches).
Mtibwa Sugar scores in 54% of matches (15 of 28 matches), while Tanzania Prisons keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tanzania Prisons
Over / Under - Mtibwa Sugar
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tanzania Prisons is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons · 0.64 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tanzania Prisons - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tanzania Prisons
Mtibwa Sugar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Tanzania Prisons | Liga | Mtibwa Sugar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.11 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.39 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 32% | 35% | ▲ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 39% | 39% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 39% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 60% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 63% | ▲ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Tanzania Prisons 0 - 0 - 1 Mtibwa Sugar. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Tanzania Prisons 2:1 Mtibwa Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar?
Tanzania Prisons score 0.71 goals per game on average and Mtibwa Sugar 0.82. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Tanzania Prisons's matches and 46% of Mtibwa Sugar's.
What form are Tanzania Prisons and Mtibwa Sugar in?
Over the last 5 games Tanzania Prisons have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Mtibwa Sugar 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


