Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraSokoine StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar: match statistics

Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tanzania Prisons played Mtibwa Sugar in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 27 June 2026. Venue: Sokoine Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Tanzania Prisons: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Mtibwa Sugar: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tanzania Prisons scores 0.71 and concedes 1.39 goals per match. Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.82 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tanzania Prisons 32%, Mtibwa Sugar 46%. Over 2.5: Tanzania Prisons 39%, Mtibwa Sugar 50%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Mtibwa Sugar has higher xG: 0.98 vs 0.94. Tanzania Prisons: 4.0 shots per match, Mtibwa Sugar: 3.4.

Match halves

Tanzania Prisons: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.32. Mtibwa Sugar: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Tanzania Prisons: 0-15 (6 goals). Mtibwa Sugar: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tanzania Prisons are favorites on paper: at home they score an average of 0.79 goals and concede 1.21 per match, while Mtibwa Sugar on the road records only 0.31 scored and 1.62 conceded. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 8 goals in those games, also averaging 1.8 points in their last five; the visitors haven’t won any of their last 5 (0 wins, 1 draw) and average just 0.2 points. Mtibwa attempt more shots (4.78 average and 2.11 on target away), but their conversion rate is only 5% and they fail to score in 69% of away matches, whereas the hosts have a 26% conversion on 3.17 shots. It’s also notable that offensive xG is similar (0.79 vs 0.87), but Mtibwa are exposed to worse opposing chances (average xG against 1.78 versus 1.10 for the hosts) and have a poorer away goal difference (-17 vs -6 for the hosts). Given better form (3 wins vs 0), higher efficiency and a more stable home defense, I back Tanzania Prisons to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The "No" scenario is more likely because Mtibwa Sugar failed to score in 69% of matches this season and averages only 0.31 goals per game, which significantly reduces the chance of BTTS. Tanzania Prisons average 1.27 goals and have an xG of 1.09, so the home side will likely find the net, but BTTS also requires a goal from the visitors; the hosts concede 1.53 goals per game on average, which partly balances the odds. In the last 5 matches Mtibwa scored 0.6 goals and had BTTS in 40% of games, while Tanzania scored 1.6 in that period and had BTTS in 60% — this shows the visitors’ offensive edge and the home side’s limited effectiveness. Shot conversion 13% versus 5% and a league BTTS rate of 35% with 78% of matches featuring a clean sheet further argue for a low probability of both teams scoring, hence an assessment of 70% for "No" and 30% for "BTTS - Yes".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG (xg_for_avg_home = 1.09 and xg_against_avg_away = 1.78) I forecast 1.44 goals for Tanzania Prisons, and with xg_for_avg_away = 0.87 and xg_against_avg_home = 1.31 I forecast 1.09 for Mtibwa; total expected goals = 2.53. A Poisson distribution on this mean implies roughly a 72% probability of Over 1.5 goals, supported by seasonal over1.5 rates: 80% for the home side and 62% for the away side. The 2.5 line is less certain — the model gives ~46% for Over 2.5 (Under 54%); although the home team has 60% of matches >2.5 this season, the away team only 38%, so there is no clear edge. The hosts average 6.78 shots with a 13% conversion rate (vs 4.78 and 5% for Mtibwa) and have scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches (1.6 avg) versus 3 for the visitors (0.6), which strengthens the goal-scoring scenario on the home side. In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommended), while Over 2.5 is borderline and Over 3.5 has low probability (~25%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 1/1 – Tanzania Prisons to lead at the break and the hosts to win at Full-Time. The hosts average 1.27 goals per match versus 0.31 for Mtibwa Sugar, and in the last 5 fixtures the hosts have won 3 of 5 (60%) while the visitors have recorded no wins (0%). Tanzania Prisons also have higher xG (1.09 vs 0.87), attempt more shots (6.78 vs 4.78) and convert them far better (13% vs 5%), while the visitors concede more xG (1.78) than the hosts (1.31). By Half-Time the hosts average 0.5 goals versus 0.15 for the visitors, and 86% of the hosts’ matches featured over 0.5 goals at the break, which reinforces the prediction of the hosts leading at Half-Time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
-1Shots-1
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
-1Shots on target-1
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0xG0
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
-1Corners-1
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0Dangerous attacks0
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
-1Fouls-1
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
-1Cards-1
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.71Goals scored / match0.82
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
1.39Goals conceded / match1.57
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
36%Average possession29%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
1.39Shots on target / match1.11
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.96Shots per match3.36
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
1.39Shots on target1.11
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
18%Shot conversion24.5%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
36%Possession29%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.94xG for0.98
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
1.31xG against1.54
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

Shooting quality

Tanzania Prisons: Counter-attackingMtibwa Sugar: Counter-attacking
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.240.29
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.510.74

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tanzania Prisons is 800% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons · 0.2 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Tanzania Prisons
LWWWL
Season result split
25% W18% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-16
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-6
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Mtibwa Sugar
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
21% W32% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-13
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-5-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mtibwa Sugar is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

0.71 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons · 0.82 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Tanzania Prisons is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.39 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons · 1.57 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Tanzania Prisons scoring profile: strong

Tanzania Prisons scores in 46% of matches (13 of 28 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 matches).

Mtibwa Sugar scoring profile: strong

Mtibwa Sugar scores in 54% of matches (15 of 28 matches), while Tanzania Prisons keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 matches).

20Goals scored (season)23
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
39Goals conceded (season)44
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
2.11Average goals in match2.39
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
8Goals scored (last 5)3
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
8Goals conceded (last 5)12
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

How often they score at least...

46%1 goal54%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
14%2 goals21%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
11%3 goals4%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0%4 goals4%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal79%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
43%2 goals43%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
18%3 goals29%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
7%4 goals7%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

35%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
7%Scored in both halves18%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
60%BTTS - last 540%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tanzania Prisons is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.04 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons · 0.64 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Tanzania Prisons - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing
Mtibwa Sugar - half-time state
7% leading43% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per match (1st half)0.64
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.32
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.89
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.21
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
50%Clean sheet before half-time32%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
64%No goal before half-time71%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

After half-time (2nd half)

0.82Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.32Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
0.96Average goals (2nd half)1.11
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
54%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar
82%No goal after half-time61%
Tanzania PrisonsMtibwa Sugar

Tanzania Prisons - second-half results

11% W50% R39% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results

25% W36% R39% P
18
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-16
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tanzania Prisons - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Mtibwa Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.41.0
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-5-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tanzania Prisons
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
1
5
16-30
4
10
31-45
2
5
46-60
4
7
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Mtibwa Sugar
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
1
6
16-30
7
10
31-45
3
8
46-60
2
4
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tanzania Prisons

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
160%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Mtibwa Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Tanzania PrisonsLigaMtibwa Sugar
Average goals in match 2.112.17 2.39
Both teams scored 32%35% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%39% 50%
Clean sheets 29%39% 21%
Goal before half-time 64%60% 75%
Goal after half-time 57%63% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tanzania Prisons 0 - 0 - 1 Mtibwa Sugar. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Tanzania Prisons 2:1 Mtibwa Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar?

Tanzania Prisons score 0.71 goals per game on average and Mtibwa Sugar 0.82. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Tanzania Prisons's matches and 46% of Mtibwa Sugar's.

What form are Tanzania Prisons and Mtibwa Sugar in?

Over the last 5 games Tanzania Prisons have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Mtibwa Sugar 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.