Ternana vs Pianese: match statistics
Ternana vs Pianese: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ternana play Pianese in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match date is 26 April 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Ternana: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Pianese: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ternana scores 1.22 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Pianese scores 1.03 and concedes 0.94. League average: 2.26 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ternana 56%, Pianese 47%. Over 2.5: Ternana 42%, Pianese 28%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Ternana has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.29. Ternana: 12.1 shots per match, Pianese: 10.4.
Match halves
Ternana: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.69. Pianese: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Ternana: 61-75 (10 goals). Pianese: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie C Group B: 2.26 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Ternana is the favorite due to superiority in chance creation: at home their average xG is 1.92 versus Pianese’s 1.16 xG on the road, and average shots on target are 4.88 vs 2.88. The hosts have scored 43 goals this season and average 1.35 goals per home match (7 goals in the last 5), while Pianese have 34 goals this season and only 0.71 goals per away match (3 in the last 5). However, Pianese do not concede many goals away — just 0.65 per match on average — and they have 47% clean sheets and as much as 59% draws on the road, which significantly increases the risk of a shared point. Form over the last 5 also favors the hosts: Ternana (ddldw) average 1.2 points per match, Pianese (ddldd) 0.8 points per match. In summary, I back the home win due to superior xG, more shots on target and lower FTS (18% vs 47%), but given the visitors’ defensive profile I expect a cautious game and a relatively high probability of a draw.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ternana | Pianese | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pianese is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Ternana · 1.2 pts / match - Pianese
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ternana is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.22 goals / match - Ternana · 1.03 goals / match - Pianese
Pianese is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.11 goals / match - Ternana · 0.94 goals / match - Pianese
Ternana scores in 75% of matches (27 of 36 matches), while Pianese keeps a clean sheet in 36% (13 of 36 matches).
Pianese scores in 61% of matches (22 of 36 matches), while Ternana keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Ternana
Over / Under — Pianese
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ternana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Pianese - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ternana
Pianese
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).
Teams vs league
| Ternana | Liga | Pianese | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.33 | 2.26 | ▼ 1.97 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 49% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 42% | 39% | ▼ 28% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 31% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | • 64% | 63% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Ternana 0 - 1 - 0 Pianese. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ternana vs Pianese?
The Serie C Group B match finished Ternana 1:3 Pianese. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ternana vs Pianese?
Ternana score 1.22 goals per game on average and Pianese 1.03. The Serie C Group B average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Ternana's matches and 47% of Pianese's.
What form are Ternana and Pianese in?
Over the last 5 games Ternana have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Pianese 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ternana vs Pianese?
The statistical background for Ternana vs Pianese — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.