Thun vs Grasshopper: match statistics
Thun presents significantly better form and statistics this season. The hosts occupy 1st place in the table with an impressive record of 22 wins, scoring 66 goals while conceding only 32. In their last 5 matches, they earned 13 points (4 wins, 1 draw), resulting in a PPG of 2.6. Grasshopper is in 11th position with a negative goal difference (-12 in away matches) and poor away form - only a 14% away win rate and a 57% loss rate. In their last 5 fixtures, the visitors secured only 4 points (0.8 PPG), which proves they are in a deep crisis. Thun also holds an advantage in efficiency (13% vs 8%) and the average of goals scored at home (2.27 vs Grasshopper's 1.07 away). All key indicators unequivocally point to a confident victory for the hosts.
Thun vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Thun played Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The match was played on 14 March 2026. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
Thun: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Grasshopper: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Thun scores 2.28 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Grasshopper scores 1.28 and concedes 1.76. League average: 3.28 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Thun 72%, Grasshopper 62%. Over 2.5: Thun 79%, Grasshopper 52%. League level: BTTS 68%, Over 2.5 67%.
xG, shots and style
Thun has higher xG: 1.93 vs 1.47. Thun: 17.5 shots per match, Grasshopper: 13.1.
Match halves
Thun: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 1.34. Grasshopper: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Thun: 46-60 (15 goals). Grasshopper: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 3.28 goals per match, BTTS 68%, Over 2.5 67%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Thun presents significantly better form and statistics this season. The hosts occupy 1st place in the table with an impressive record of 22 wins, scoring 66 goals while conceding only 32. In their last 5 matches, they earned 13 points (4 wins, 1 draw), resulting in a PPG of 2.6. Grasshopper is in 11th position with a negative goal difference (-12 in away matches) and poor away form - only a 14% away win rate and a 57% loss rate. In their last 5 fixtures, the visitors secured only 4 points (0.8 PPG), which proves they are in a deep crisis. Thun also holds an advantage in efficiency (13% vs 8%) and the average of goals scored at home (2.27 vs Grasshopper's 1.07 away). All key indicators unequivocally point to a confident victory for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Thun | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Thun is 225% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Thun · 0.8 pts / match - Grasshopper
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Thun is 78% better for: goals scored per match.
2.28 goals / match - Thun · 1.28 goals / match - Grasshopper
Thun is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.1 goals / match - Thun · 1.76 goals / match - Grasshopper
Thun scores in 93% of matches (27 of 29 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 matches).
Grasshopper scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Thun keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Thun
Over / Under - Grasshopper
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Thun is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.72 pts / match - Thun · 1.17 pts / match - Grasshopper
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Thun - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 76%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Thun
Grasshopper
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Thun | Liga | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.38 | 3.28 | ▼ 3.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 72% | 68% | ▼ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 79% | 67% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 21% | 18% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 76% | ▼ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 82% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Thun 1 - 1 - 0 Grasshopper. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Thun vs Grasshopper?
The Super League match finished Thun 5:1 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Thun and Grasshopper?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Thun won 1, Grasshopper won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Thun vs Grasshopper?
Thun score 2.28 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.28. The Super League average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 72% of Thun's matches and 62% of Grasshopper's.
What form are Thun and Grasshopper in?
Over the last 5 games Thun have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Grasshopper 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Thun vs Grasshopper?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Thun vs Grasshopper: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.