Tianjin Teda vs Wuhan Three Towns: match statistics
Tianjin Teda vs Wuhan Three Towns: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tianjin Teda played Wuhan Three Towns in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 1 May 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Tianjin Teda: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Wuhan Three Towns: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tianjin Teda scores 1.38 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Wuhan Three Towns scores 1.25 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.85 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tianjin Teda 50%, Wuhan Three Towns 50%. Over 2.5: Tianjin Teda 63%, Wuhan Three Towns 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Wuhan Three Towns has higher xG: 1.14 vs 1.00. Tianjin Teda: 8.8 shots per match, Wuhan Three Towns: 10.1.
Match halves
Tianjin Teda: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.75. Wuhan Three Towns: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
Tianjin Teda: 31-45+ (4 goals). Wuhan Three Towns: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tianjin Teda are the favorites in this matchup: the hosts have scored 11 goals in their last 5 matches (2.2 per match) and averaged 1.4 points per game over that period, whereas Wuhan Three Towns scored 5 goals in their last 5 (1.0 per match) and average only 0.6 points per game. Defensively the home side have a clear edge — Tianjin concede 1.5 goals on average in home matches with xG against of 1.32, while Wuhan concede 3.0 goals on average away with xG against of 1.66. The quality of created chances is similar (average xG 0.96 vs 0.99, average shots 8.25 vs 8.0 and shots on target 2.75 vs 2.5), so the difference is mainly due to superior form and defensive organization of the hosts. Additionally, the hosts have 25% clean sheets at home versus 0% clean sheets for the visitors away, and the visitors have conceded 12 goals in their last 5 matches compared to 8 for the hosts; therefore I assess Tianjin as more likely to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes; Wuhan concedes on average 3.0 goals per match this season (16 conceded) and has 0% clean sheets, so they almost always allow the opponent at least one goal. Tianjin has been scoring an average of 2.2 goals in the last 5 matches (11 goals) and BTTS occurred in 80% of those five games, while seasonally the hosts average 12.25 shots with 3.25 on target and have xG_for 1.3, indicating a real ability to score. Wuhan has a seasonal BTTS rate of 75% and seasonal xG_for 0.99 (xG_for 1.22 in the last 5), so they also have scoring potential despite poor form (1 win and 4 losses in the last 5). Both teams have been conceding a lot recently: Tianjin 1.6 goals conceded in L5 (8 conceded), Wuhan 2.4 in L5 (12 conceded), and the league averages 2.86 goals and 53% BTTS, which together favor an exchange of goals. Based on this I assess the probability of BTTS at around 70% versus 30% for No Goal, because the strongest signals are weak defenses and the hosts' strong recent scoring form.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Tianjin averages 1.50 goals scored per match with xG 1.30, while Wuhan concedes 3.00 goals per match with xG against 1.66, yielding expected values of approximately 1.48 goals for the home side and 1.20 for the visitors (total 2.68). Stats show that Over 1.5 occurred for the home team in 75% of matches and for the visitors in 100% of matches, whereas Over 2.5 is present for the visitors in 75% but for the home side only in 25%, indicating some risk on the 2.5 line. In the last 5 matches Tianjin scored 11 goals (2.2 avg), and Wuhan conceded 12 goals in their last 5 (2.4 avg), which further supports the expectation of at least two goals in the match. Considering total xG = 2.68, Wuhan’s high concession rate (3.0) and the strong Over 1.5 occurrence (75%/100%), the strongest and most reliable selection is Over 1.5; Over 3.5 is significantly less likely (seasonal Over 3.5: 25% for the home side, 50% for the visitors).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Home side shows a clear first-half edge: Tianjin led at the break in 50% of matches and averages 0.75 goals in the first half, while Wuhan records 0.0 first-half goals and concedes an average of 1.5 goals by halftime. Over the full match Tianjin averages 1.5 goals and wins 50% of games, whereas Wuhan concedes 3.0 goals per match on average, has a 0% win rate and 75% losses, which strongly favors the hosts. Quality indicators corroborate the hosts’ superiority with an xG of 1.3 for Tianjin versus 0.99 for the visitors, and more shots and shots on target (12.25 vs 8.0 and 3.25 vs 2.5), so an expected offensive advantage is clear. For these reasons the most likely scenario is the hosts leading at half-time and winning at full-time (HT/FT 1/1), while other outcomes (a draw or an away win) are assessed as considerably less probable.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tianjin Teda | Wuhan Three Towns | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tianjin Teda is 133% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Tianjin Teda · 0.6 pts / match - Wuhan Three Towns
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tianjin Teda is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.38 goals / match - Tianjin Teda · 1.25 goals / match - Wuhan Three Towns
Tianjin Teda is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Tianjin Teda · 2 goals / match - Wuhan Three Towns
Tianjin Teda scores in 63% of matches (5 of 8 matches), while Wuhan Three Towns keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).
Wuhan Three Towns scores in 63% of matches (5 of 8 matches), while Tianjin Teda keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tianjin Teda
Over / Under - Wuhan Three Towns
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tianjin Teda is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.63 pts / match - Tianjin Teda · 1 pts / match - Wuhan Three Towns
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tianjin Teda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wuhan Three Towns - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tianjin Teda
Wuhan Three Towns
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Tianjin Teda | Liga | Wuhan Three Towns | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.88 | 2.85 | ▲ 3.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 27% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 65% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 86% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Tianjin Teda 1 - 0 - 1 Wuhan Three Towns. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tianjin Teda vs Wuhan Three Towns?
The Chinese Super League match finished Tianjin Teda 2:2 Wuhan Three Towns. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tianjin Teda and Wuhan Three Towns?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tianjin Teda won 1, Wuhan Three Towns won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tianjin Teda vs Wuhan Three Towns?
Tianjin Teda score 1.38 goals per game on average and Wuhan Three Towns 1.25. The Chinese Super League average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Tianjin Teda's matches and 50% of Wuhan Three Towns's.
What form are Tianjin Teda and Wuhan Three Towns in?
Over the last 5 games Tianjin Teda have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Wuhan Three Towns 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tianjin Teda vs Wuhan Three Towns?
The statistical background for Tianjin Teda vs Wuhan Three Towns — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.