Argentina - Primera DivisiónEstadio José DellagiovannaData current as of 15 October 2026

Tigre vs Banfield: match statistics

Tigre crest
Tigre
1 : 2half-time 1:2
Banfield crest
Banfield

Tigre vs Banfield: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tigre played Banfield in Primera División (Argentina). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Estadio José Dellagiovanna. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Tigre: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Banfield: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tigre scores 1.04 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. Banfield scores 1.07 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.16 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tigre 52%, Banfield 56%. Over 2.5: Tigre 33%, Banfield 44%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Tigre has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.38. Tigre: 13.3 shots per match, Banfield: 12.3.

Match halves

Tigre: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.63. Banfield: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Tigre: 46-60 (8 goals). Banfield: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.16 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-3. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tigre are favourites based on their home results: they have won 38% of such matches and lost 15%, while Banfield have been beaten in 64% of their away games. The hosts concede an average of 0.77 goals at home, compared with 1.5 for the visitors away from home, which points to Tigre despite their recent poor form. The difference in chance quality is also reflected in xG: Tigre generate 1.41 per home match, while Banfield allow chances worth 2.07 on the road. However, caution is warranted: Tigre have failed to win any of their last five matches, scoring just 4 goals in that run; Banfield are also winless over the same period, although they have scored 7. A draw remains a realistic outcome, particularly as 46% of Tigre's home matches have ended level.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have scored in a similar proportion of their matches this season: 54% for Tigre and 57% for Banfield, both above the league average of 47%. In their last five matches, this scenario occurred in 3 of Tigre’s 5 games and all 5 of Banfield’s, with each team conceding an average of 1.6 goals in those matches. Tigre’s chances of scoring are boosted by an average xG of 1.61, compared with the 2.07 xG conceded by Banfield, who kept a clean sheet in just 14% of matches. The greater risk for BTTS - Yes is the visitors’ attack: they score an average of 0.86 goals and failed to score in 36% of matches, although their xG over the last five games has risen to 1.58, while Tigre conceded 8 goals during that period. Therefore, BTTS - Yes has a moderate edge, but Banfield’s weaker scoring record over the season means it cannot be considered a strong pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: this line was not surpassed in 85% of Tigre’s matches and 71% of Banfield’s. Tigre average 1.31 goals scored, while Banfield average 0.86, although the visitors concede 1.50 goals per match, giving the hosts greater attacking potential. The last 5 matches for the two teams produced averages of 2.4 and 2.8 goals respectively, so current form does not rule out a few goals, but still does not point clearly to 4 or more. The projected total of 2.55 goals is also above the league average of 2.15, which makes the 3.5 line a safer margin than backing Under 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is the most likely starting point: Tigre were level at the break in 5 of 13 matches, while Banfield did so in 9 of 14. Caution about a home lead is reinforced by Tigre’s recent form—they have failed to score before half-time in five consecutive matches and went into the break trailing on three occasions. After the interval, however, the advantage shifts to Tigre, who averaged 1.00 goals in the second half, while Banfield conceded 0.93 and scored just 0.43. Over the full season, the hosts won 38% of their matches compared with 14% for the visitors, supporting a Tigre victory at full-time. Tigre’s four defeats in their last five matches weaken confidence in the prediction, but Banfield’s frequent half-time draws combined with their weaker second-half performance point primarily to a half-time draw and a Tigre win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
TigreBanfield
26Shots10
TigreBanfield
8Shots on target2
TigreBanfield
2.7xG0.97
TigreBanfield
9Corners3
TigreBanfield
70Dangerous attacks28
TigreBanfield
7Fouls14
TigreBanfield
3Cards3
TigreBanfield

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.04Goals scored / match1.07
TigreBanfield
0.96Goals conceded / match1.33
TigreBanfield
47%Average possession41%
TigreBanfield
4.07Shots on target / match3.89
TigreBanfield

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.3Shots per match12.26
TigreBanfield
4.07Shots on target3.89
TigreBanfield
7.8%Shot conversion8.8%
TigreBanfield
47%Possession41%
TigreBanfield
1.48xG for1.38
TigreBanfield
1.34xG against1.81
TigreBanfield

Shooting quality

Tigre: BalancedBanfield: Balanced
TigreBanfield
Accuracy (shots on target)31%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Banfield is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Tigre · 0.6 pts / match - Banfield

Tigre
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
26% W41% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-11-9
1.19 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Banfield
LLDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
26% W26% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-13
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-9
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tigre is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.96 goals / match - Tigre · 1.33 goals / match - Banfield

Tigre scoring profile: strong

Tigre scores in 63% of matches (17 of 27 matches), while Banfield keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).

Banfield scoring profile: strong

Banfield scores in 70% of matches (19 of 27 matches), while Tigre keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).

28Goals scored (season)29
TigreBanfield
26Goals conceded (season)36
TigreBanfield
2Average goals in match2.41
TigreBanfield
4Goals scored (last 5)7
TigreBanfield
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
TigreBanfield

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal70%
TigreBanfield
26%2 goals30%
TigreBanfield
11%3 goals7%
TigreBanfield
4%4 goals0%
TigreBanfield

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal78%
TigreBanfield
22%2 goals41%
TigreBanfield
4%3 goals15%
TigreBanfield
0%4 goals0%
TigreBanfield

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time15%
TigreBanfield
0%BTTS in both halves7%
TigreBanfield
15%Scored in both halves15%
TigreBanfield

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
TigreBanfield
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
TigreBanfield
60%BTTS - last 5100%
TigreBanfield

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
TigreBanfield
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
TigreBanfield
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
TigreBanfield

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
TigreBanfield
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
TigreBanfield
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
TigreBanfield

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tigre - half-time state
26% leading44% draw30% trailing
Banfield - half-time state
22% leading52% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per match (1st half)1.19
TigreBanfield
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.37
TigreBanfield
0.37Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
TigreBanfield
0.78Average goals (1st half)0.93
TigreBanfield
70%Clean sheet before half-time63%
TigreBanfield
70%No goal before half-time63%
TigreBanfield

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per match (2nd half)1.19
TigreBanfield
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
TigreBanfield
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
TigreBanfield
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.48
TigreBanfield
48%Clean sheet after half-time41%
TigreBanfield
52%No goal after half-time52%
TigreBanfield

Tigre - second-half results

26% W52% D22% L
33
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Banfield - second-half results

26% W41% D33% L
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tigre - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Banfield - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tigre
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
6
3
16-30
2
4
31-45
8
5
46-60
4
6
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Banfield
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
5
16-30
6
7
31-45
7
7
46-60
4
7
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-55%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tigre

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.99
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Banfield

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

TigreLigaBanfield
Average goals in match▼ 2.002.16▲ 2.41
Both teams scored▲ 52%47%▲ 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%38%▲ 44%
Clean sheets▼ 30%33%▼ 22%
Goal before half-time▼ 56%61%▼ 59%
Goal after half-time▼ 70%73%▲ 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.16
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / match
0.95
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BanfieldYellow cardDavid Zalazar
  2. TigreYellow cardLuciano Minniti
  3. TigreYellow cardSantiago López Grobin
  4. BanfieldYellow cardJuan Luis Alfaro
  5. TigreYellow cardJerónimo Domina
  6. BanfieldSubstitutionOn: Thomas RodríguezOff: Federico Medina
  7. BanfieldYellow cardTomás Alexander Adoryán
  8. TigreSubstitutionOn: Juan VillalbaOff: Federico Hernán Álvarez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Tigre 1 - 0 - 3 Banfield. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Banfield
1 : 0
Tigre
CA Banfield
1 : 0
CA Tigre
CA Tigre
1 : 0
CA Banfield
Tigre
0 : 1
Banfield

FAQ

What was the result of Tigre vs Banfield?

The Primera División match finished Tigre 1:2 Banfield. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tigre and Banfield?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Tigre won 1, Banfield won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tigre vs Banfield?

Tigre score 1.04 goals per game on average and Banfield 1.07. The Primera División average is 2.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Tigre's matches and 56% of Banfield's.

What form are Tigre and Banfield in?

Over the last 5 games Tigre have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Banfield 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tigre vs Banfield?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.