Hungary - NB IIVárosi StadionData current as of 01 November 2026

Tiszakécske vs Videoton: match statistics

Tiszakécske crest
Tiszakécske
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Videoton crest
Videoton

Tiszakécske vs Videoton: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tiszakécske played Videoton in NB II (Hungary). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Venue: Városi Stadion. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Tiszakécske: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Videoton: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tiszakécske scores 2.18 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Videoton scores 1.36 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.97 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tiszakécske 73%, Videoton 55%. Over 2.5: Tiszakécske 55%, Videoton 73%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Videoton has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.54. Tiszakécske: 6.5 shots per match, Videoton: 11.7.

Match halves

Tiszakécske: half-time lead 64%, second-half goals 0.91. Videoton: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

Tiszakécske: 31-45+ (6 goals). Videoton: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB II: 2.97 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tiszakécske have won 83% of their home matches, while Videoton have lost all five of their away games, making the hosts clear favourites. At home, they score an average of 2.17 goals and concede 0.83, whereas the visitors manage just 0.6 goals away from home while conceding 1.8. The hosts also create more chances: their average home xG is 1.98, compared with Videoton’s 1.31 away from home, while their shots on target per match stand at 9.5 and 4, respectively. The last five matches in both settings reinforce this trend: Tiszakécske scored 12 goals across five games, while Videoton won just once and suffered four defeats during that period. The hosts’ 11 goals conceded recently warrant some caution, but the visitors’ poor away form still points to a Tiszakécske win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Tiszakécske average 2.0 goals at home, while Videoton concede 1.8 away, making a home goal fairly likely. The greater uncertainty concerns the visitors: they score just 0.6 goals per away match, have failed to score in 40% of their matches, and the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their home games. Recent defensive form from Tiszakécske weighs against BTTS - No: they conceded an average of 2.2 goals across their last five matches, while Videoton posted an xG of 1.63 over that period. Despite this warning sign, the visitors’ away scoring record gives a slight edge to the scenario in which Videoton fail to score. BTTS - No means at least one team does not score; it does not necessarily mean a 0-0 draw or that neither team scores.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Tiszakécske score an average of 2.0 goals at home, while Videoton concede 1.8 goals away, giving the hosts a clear chance to score twice on their own. This scenario is also supported by the hosts’ 1.77 xG and an average of 6.33 shots on target in their home matches. At least two goals were scored in 83% of Tiszakécske’s home matches and 60% of Videoton’s away matches, making Over 1.5 goals the pick best supported by the data. Higher lines are less reliable: Over 3.5 goals landed in only 17% of the hosts’ home matches and 20% of the visitors’ away matches.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest pick is Tiszakécske to lead at the break and win after 90 minutes: the hosts led at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches, while Videoton were trailing at the break in 2 of 5 over the same period and led only once. Across the full dataset, the hosts average 0.83 goals in the first half compared with 0.2 for the visitors, strengthening the case for an early advantage. Their home record supports them holding on to the lead: Tiszakécske average 2 goals per match, while Videoton concede 1.8 goals away from home and have lost every match included in the sample. The hosts also average 1.17 goals after the break, while the visitors concede 1.4 in that half, giving the 1/1 HT/FT outcome a solid basis. A half-time draw followed by a home win remains a notable alternative, as Videoton were level at the break in 4 of their 5 away matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
TiszakécskeVideoton
-1Shots-1
TiszakécskeVideoton
-1Shots on target-1
TiszakécskeVideoton
0xG0
TiszakécskeVideoton
-1Corners-1
TiszakécskeVideoton
0Dangerous attacks0
TiszakécskeVideoton
-1Fouls-1
TiszakécskeVideoton
-1Cards-1
TiszakécskeVideoton

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

TiszakécskeVideoton
2.18Goals scored / match1.36
TiszakécskeVideoton
1.36Goals conceded / match1.27
TiszakécskeVideoton
35%Average possession51%
TiszakécskeVideoton
3.64Shots on target / match5.27
TiszakécskeVideoton

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.55Shots per match11.73
TiszakécskeVideoton
3.64Shots on target5.27
TiszakécskeVideoton
33.3%Shot conversion11.6%
TiszakécskeVideoton
35%Possession51%
TiszakécskeVideoton
1.54xG for1.56
TiszakécskeVideoton
1.35xG against1.18
TiszakécskeVideoton

Shooting quality

Tiszakécske: Counter-attackingVideoton: Balanced
TiszakécskeVideoton
Accuracy (shots on target)56%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.240.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.600.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tiszakécske is 83% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Tiszakécske · 1.2 pts / match - Videoton

Tiszakécske
WDWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
55% W45% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-0
2.09 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Videoton
WLWLL
Season result split
36% W0% D64% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-7
1.09 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-5
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tiszakécske is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

2.18 goals / match - Tiszakécske · 1.36 goals / match - Videoton

Videoton is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.36 goals / match - Tiszakécske · 1.27 goals / match - Videoton

Tiszakécske scoring profile: very strong

Tiszakécske scores in 100% of matches (11 of 11 matches), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

Videoton scoring profile: very strong

Videoton scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Tiszakécske keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

24Goals scored (season)15
TiszakécskeVideoton
15Goals conceded (season)14
TiszakécskeVideoton
3.55Average goals in match2.64
TiszakécskeVideoton
12Goals scored (last 5)6
TiszakécskeVideoton
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
TiszakécskeVideoton

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal82%
TiszakécskeVideoton
64%2 goals27%
TiszakécskeVideoton
36%3 goals18%
TiszakécskeVideoton
18%4 goals9%
TiszakécskeVideoton

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal73%
TiszakécskeVideoton
36%2 goals45%
TiszakécskeVideoton
27%3 goals9%
TiszakécskeVideoton
0%4 goals0%
TiszakécskeVideoton

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

45%BTTS at half-time27%
TiszakécskeVideoton
9%BTTS in both halves0%
TiszakécskeVideoton
36%Scored in both halves18%
TiszakécskeVideoton

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
TiszakécskeVideoton
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
TiszakécskeVideoton
60%BTTS - last 540%
TiszakécskeVideoton

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
TiszakécskeVideoton
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
TiszakécskeVideoton
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TiszakécskeVideoton

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
TiszakécskeVideoton
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
TiszakécskeVideoton
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
TiszakécskeVideoton

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tiszakécske is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.18 pts / match - Tiszakécske · 1.18 pts / match - Videoton

Tiszakécske - half-time state
64% leading27% draw9% trailing
Videoton - half-time state
18% leading64% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.18Points per match (1st half)1.18
TiszakécskeVideoton
1.27Goals scored (1st half)0.55
TiszakécskeVideoton
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
TiszakécskeVideoton
1.82Average goals (1st half)1
TiszakécskeVideoton
45%Clean sheet before half-time55%
TiszakécskeVideoton
18%No goal before half-time55%
TiszakécskeVideoton

After half-time (2nd half)

1.45Points per match (2nd half)1.18
TiszakécskeVideoton
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
TiszakécskeVideoton
0.82Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
TiszakécskeVideoton
1.73Average goals (2nd half)1.64
TiszakécskeVideoton
55%Clean sheet after half-time45%
TiszakécskeVideoton
45%No goal after half-time45%
TiszakécskeVideoton

Tiszakécske - second-half results

36% W36% D27% L
24
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at half-time in 64% of matches and wins 55%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Videoton - second-half results

36% W9% D55% L
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tiszakécske - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.00
Goals scored / match1.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+6-2
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8
Videoton - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tiszakécske
ScoredConceded
5
0
0-15
3
2
16-30
6
4
31-45
2
4
46-60
4
2
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Videoton
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
0
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
82%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tiszakécske

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Videoton

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).

Teams vs league

TiszakécskeLigaVideoton
Average goals in match▲ 3.552.97▼ 2.64
Both teams scored▲ 73%57%▼ 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 55%57%▲ 73%
Clean sheets▲ 27%23%▲ 27%
Goal before half-time▲ 91%70%▼ 64%
Goal after half-time▼ 73%84%▲ 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.97
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.69
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. VideotonGoalDániel Németh

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Tiszakécske 0 - 1 - 1 Videoton. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Duna Aszfalt TVSE Tiszakécske
1 : 1
Videoton FC Fehérvár
Videoton FC Fehérvár
5 : 0
Duna Aszfalt TVSE Tiszakécske

FAQ

What was the result of Tiszakécske vs Videoton?

The NB II match finished Tiszakécske 0:1 Videoton. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tiszakécske and Videoton?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tiszakécske won 0, Videoton won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tiszakécske vs Videoton?

Tiszakécske score 2.18 goals per game on average and Videoton 1.36. The NB II average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Tiszakécske's matches and 55% of Videoton's.

What form are Tiszakécske and Videoton in?

Over the last 5 games Tiszakécske have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Videoton 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tiszakécske vs Videoton?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.