Japan - J1 LeagueAjinomoto StadiumData current as of 21 October 2026

Tokyo vs Mito Hollyhock: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Tokyo vs Mito Hollyhock: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tokyo play Mito Hollyhock in J1 League (Japan). The match date is 25 October 2026. Venue: Ajinomoto Stadium.

Current form

Tokyo: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Mito Hollyhock: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tokyo scores 2.10 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Mito Hollyhock scores 1.20 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tokyo 30%, Mito Hollyhock 70%. Over 2.5: Tokyo 50%, Mito Hollyhock 40%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Tokyo has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.09. Tokyo: 16.0 shots per match, Mito Hollyhock: 10.3.

Match halves

Tokyo: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.50. Mito Hollyhock: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Tokyo: 61-75 (7 goals). Mito Hollyhock: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J1 League: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.1Goals scored / match1.2
TokyoMito Hollyhock
0.8Goals conceded / match1.4
TokyoMito Hollyhock
54%Average possession42%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
5.1Shots on target / match3.3
TokyoMito Hollyhock

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16Shots per match10.3
TokyoMito Hollyhock
5.1Shots on target3.3
TokyoMito Hollyhock
13.1%Shot conversion11.7%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
54%Possession42%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
1.78xG for1.09
TokyoMito Hollyhock
1.1xG against1.82
TokyoMito Hollyhock

Shooting quality

Tokyo: AttackingMito Hollyhock: Balanced
TokyoMito Hollyhock
Accuracy (shots on target)32%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tokyo is 1400% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Tokyo · 0.2 pts / match - Mito Hollyhock

Tokyo
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
70% W20% D10% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-1
2.30 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%
Mito Hollyhock
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W30% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-5
0.90 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 away
1-1-2
LWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.78Opponent xG: 1.94BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tokyo is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

2.1 goals / match - Tokyo · 1.2 goals / match - Mito Hollyhock

Tokyo is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - Tokyo · 1.4 goals / match - Mito Hollyhock

Tokyo scoring profile: very strong

Tokyo scores in 100% of matches (10 of 10 matches), while Mito Hollyhock keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 matches).

Mito Hollyhock scoring profile: mixed

Mito Hollyhock scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Tokyo keeps a clean sheet in 70% (7 of 10 matches).

21Goals scored (season)12
TokyoMito Hollyhock
8Goals conceded (season)14
TokyoMito Hollyhock
2.9Average goals in match2.6
TokyoMito Hollyhock
12Goals scored (last 5)2
TokyoMito Hollyhock
0Goals conceded (last 5)7
TokyoMito Hollyhock

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal70%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
70%2 goals20%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
30%3 goals20%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
10%4 goals10%
TokyoMito Hollyhock

How often they concede at least...

30%1 goal100%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
20%2 goals40%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
10%3 goals0%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
10%4 goals0%
TokyoMito Hollyhock

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time10%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
10%BTTS in both halves0%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
40%Scored in both halves20%
TokyoMito Hollyhock

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
30%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
0%BTTS - last 540%
TokyoMito Hollyhock

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TokyoMito Hollyhock

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
70%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
TokyoMito Hollyhock

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tokyo is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Tokyo · 1.4 pts / match - Mito Hollyhock

Tokyo - half-time state
30% leading60% draw10% trailing
Mito Hollyhock - half-time state
30% leading50% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.4
TokyoMito Hollyhock
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.6
TokyoMito Hollyhock
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
TokyoMito Hollyhock
0.9Average goals (1st half)1
TokyoMito Hollyhock
80%Clean sheet before half-time70%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
50%No goal before half-time60%
TokyoMito Hollyhock

After half-time (2nd half)

2.3Points per match (2nd half)0.7
TokyoMito Hollyhock
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
TokyoMito Hollyhock
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
TokyoMito Hollyhock
2Average goals (2nd half)1.6
TokyoMito Hollyhock
70%Clean sheet after half-time20%
TokyoMito Hollyhock
10%No goal after half-time50%
TokyoMito Hollyhock

Tokyo - second-half results

70% W20% D10% L
15
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding233%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 70%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mito Hollyhock - second-half results

10% W40% D50% L
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tokyo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.803.00
Goals scored / match0.42.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.42.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mito Hollyhock - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.20
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.21.6
1 goal20%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tokyo
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
2
46-60
7
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Mito Hollyhock
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tokyo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Mito Hollyhock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

TokyoLigaMito Hollyhock
Average goals in match• 2.902.92▼ 2.60
Both teams scored▼ 30%56%▲ 70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%55%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▲ 70%25%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%67%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%87%▲ 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tokyo 0 - 0 - 1 Mito Hollyhock. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

When do Tokyo and Mito Hollyhock play?

Tokyo face Mito Hollyhock on 25 October 2026 in J1 League at Ajinomoto Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tokyo vs Mito Hollyhock?

Tokyo score 2.10 goals per game on average and Mito Hollyhock 1.20. The J1 League average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Tokyo's matches and 70% of Mito Hollyhock's.

What form are Tokyo and Mito Hollyhock in?

Over the last 5 games Tokyo have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Mito Hollyhock 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tokyo vs Mito Hollyhock?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tokyo vs Mito Hollyhock: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.