United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 18 October 2026

Toronto II vs FC Cincinnati II: match statistics

Toronto II crest
Toronto II
2 : 1half-time 1:1
FC Cincinnati II crest
FC Cincinnati II

Toronto II vs FC Cincinnati II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Toronto II played FC Cincinnati II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Toronto II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. FC Cincinnati II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Toronto II scores 1.67 and concedes 1.96 goals per match. FC Cincinnati II scores 1.16 and concedes 2.28. League average: 3.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Toronto II 63%, FC Cincinnati II 56%. Over 2.5: Toronto II 75%, FC Cincinnati II 72%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

FC Cincinnati II has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.27. Toronto II: 10.3 shots per match, FC Cincinnati II: 10.6.

Match halves

Toronto II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.79. FC Cincinnati II: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Toronto II: 16-30 (9 goals). FC Cincinnati II: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.34 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-1. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 40%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Toronto II have a clear home advantage, winning 55% of their home matches and averaging 1.91 goals scored there, while FC Cincinnati II lose as many as 92% of their away games. The visitors concede an average of 3.00 goals per match on the road, have kept no clean sheets, and have a -27 goal difference. The hosts are more effective in chance creation, averaging 4.36 shots on target compared with their opponents’ 3.42, while Cincinnati II fail to score in 50% of their away matches. Recent form also favors Toronto, who collected 7 points from their previous five matches, whereas the visitors lost 4 of their last 5 games and conceded 14 goals in the process. Toronto’s defense is not flawless, conceding an average of 1.64 goals at home, but their attacking edge and Cincinnati II’s exceptionally poor away form point to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for both teams to score is strengthened by their current form: in their last 5 matches, both Toronto II and FC Cincinnati II recorded BTTS in 80% of games. During this period, Toronto II averaged 2.0 goals scored and 2.2 conceded, while Cincinnati II scored 1.6 goals and allowed opponents as many as 2.8. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches this season, and their average of 3.0 goals conceded clearly supports the likelihood of the hosts finding the net. However, Cincinnati II have been less effective over the course of the competition, scoring just 0.75 goals per match and failing to score in 50% of their appearances, which limits confidence in the pick. Despite this, their recent xG stands at 1.60, compared with 1.79 xG conceded by Toronto II, making a goal for each side the more likely scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Toronto II score an average of 1.54 goals per match, while FC Cincinnati II concede as many as 3.00 goals and have kept no clean sheets this season. The hosts should create plenty of chances, as their average xG stands at 1.44, while the visitors’ defence allows an average of 2.01 xG. In their last five matches, Toronto scored 10 goals and conceded 11, while Cincinnati II scored 8 and allowed their opponents to net 14; both teams had goals scored by both sides in 80% of their matches during this period. The Over 1.5 goals line has a clear edge, as it was surpassed in 69% of Toronto’s matches and as many as 92% of Cincinnati II’s fixtures, while the visitors’ defensive vulnerability further strengthens this selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is Toronto II leading at the break and securing a home win in the final result, as FC Cincinnati II have lost 92% of their matches this season and concede an average of 3.00 goals per game. The visitors have been particularly poor starters: they were trailing at half-time in 75% of their appearances and conceded an average of 1.67 goals before the break. Toronto II were ahead at half-time in 3 of their 13 league matches, but this figure has risen to 40% across their last five games, with an average of 1.40 goals scored before the break. The hosts should maintain their advantage after half-time, as Toronto score an average of 1.08 goals in second halves, while Cincinnati II concede 1.33. Toronto’s superior attacking quality provides an additional argument: the hosts’ xG stands at 1.44 compared with 1.25 for the visitors, while their shot conversion rate is 14%, versus 8% for Cincinnati II.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
15Shots10
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
9Shots on target2
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
2.01xG1.08
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
6Corners1
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
60Dangerous attacks42
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
8Fouls12
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
0Cards1
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
1.67Goals scored / match1.16
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
1.96Goals conceded / match2.28
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
48%Average possession43%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
4.33Shots on target / match3.92
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.25Shots per match10.6
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
4.33Shots on target3.92
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
16.3%Shot conversion10.9%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
48%Possession43%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
1.27xG for1.34
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
1.7xG against1.84
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

Shooting quality

Toronto II: Efficient finishingFC Cincinnati II: Balanced
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
Accuracy (shots on target)42%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Toronto II is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Toronto II · 0.6 pts / match - FC Cincinnati II

Toronto II
LWDLW
Season result split
38% W17% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-11
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
FC Cincinnati II
LLLWL
Season result split
20% W8% D72% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-18
0.68 pts / match · goal difference -28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-11
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.94BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Toronto II is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

1.67 goals / match - Toronto II · 1.16 goals / match - FC Cincinnati II

Toronto II is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.96 goals / match - Toronto II · 2.28 goals / match - FC Cincinnati II

Toronto II scoring profile: very strong

Toronto II scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while FC Cincinnati II keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 25 matches).

FC Cincinnati II scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati II scores in 68% of matches (17 of 25 matches), while Toronto II keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).

40Goals scored (season)29
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
47Goals conceded (season)57
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
3.63Average goals in match3.44
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
10Goals scored (last 5)8
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
11Goals conceded (last 5)14
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal68%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
58%2 goals32%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
17%3 goals8%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
8%4 goals4%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal88%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
54%2 goals68%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
33%3 goals40%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
17%4 goals16%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
FC Cincinnati II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 25 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time24%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
17%BTTS in both halves4%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
29%Scored in both halves8%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
80%BTTS - last 580%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time84%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Toronto II is 121% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Toronto II · 0.68 pts / match - FC Cincinnati II

Toronto II - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing
FC Cincinnati II - half-time state
12% leading32% draw56% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)0.68
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)1.24
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
1.42Average goals (1st half)1.64
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
58%Clean sheet before half-time24%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
42%No goal before half-time68%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)1
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
1.42Goals conceded (2nd half)1.04
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
2.21Average goals (2nd half)1.8
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
29%Clean sheet after half-time32%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
50%No goal after half-time56%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

Toronto II - second-half results

17% W38% D46% L
36
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.9

Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FC Cincinnati II - second-half results

24% W28% D48% L
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-21
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Toronto II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match1.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match2.41.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 7
FC Cincinnati II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.6
Average goals in match1.82.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Toronto II
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
9
5
16-30
7
6
31-45
4
10
46-60
6
8
61-75
9
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

FC Cincinnati II
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
4
13
16-30
3
9
31-45
5
5
46-60
6
9
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Toronto II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

FC Cincinnati II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Toronto IILigaFC Cincinnati II
Average goals in match▲ 3.633.34▲ 3.44
Both teams scored• 63%62%▼ 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%67%▲ 72%
Clean sheets• 21%21%▼ 12%
Goal before half-time▼ 75%77%▲ 84%
Goal after half-time▼ 79%85%▲ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.34
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC Cincinnati IIGoalCheikhou Niang
  2. Toronto IIGoalDamar Dixon O'Neill
  3. Toronto IISubstitutionOn: Gabriel MikinaOff: Lazar Stefanovic
  4. Toronto IISubstitutionOn: Fletcher BankOff: Malik Henry
  5. FC Cincinnati IIYellow cardCamden Sphire
  6. Toronto IISubstitutionOn: Daniel StampatoriOff: Abundance Salaou
  7. Toronto IISubstitutionOn: Micah ChisholmOff: Stefan Kapor

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Toronto II 3 - 1 - 1 FC Cincinnati II. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Toronto II
3 : 1
FC Cincinnati II
FC Cincinnati II
5 : 0
Toronto II
Toronto FC II USL
1 : 0
FC Cincinnati II
FC Cincinnati II
1 : 1
Toronto FC II USL
FC Cincinnati II
0 : 1
Toronto FC II USL

FAQ

What was the result of Toronto II vs FC Cincinnati II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Toronto II 2:1 FC Cincinnati II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Toronto II and FC Cincinnati II?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Toronto II won 3, FC Cincinnati II won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Toronto II vs FC Cincinnati II?

Toronto II score 1.67 goals per game on average and FC Cincinnati II 1.16. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Toronto II's matches and 56% of FC Cincinnati II's.

What form are Toronto II and FC Cincinnati II in?

Over the last 5 games Toronto II have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and FC Cincinnati II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Toronto II vs FC Cincinnati II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Toronto II vs FC Cincinnati II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.