Finland - VeikkausliigaVeritas StadionData current as of 23 July 2026

TPS vs Ilves: match statistics

TPS crest
TPS
1 : 3half-time 1:2
Ilves crest
Ilves

TPS vs Ilves: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

TPS play Ilves in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match date is 20 July 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Veritas Stadion. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

TPS: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Ilves: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

TPS scores 1.25 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. Ilves scores 1.75 and concedes 1.88. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: TPS 56%, Ilves 69%. Over 2.5: TPS 50%, Ilves 75%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

TPS has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.44. TPS: 11.7 shots per match, Ilves: 11.8.

Match halves

TPS: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.69. Ilves: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

TPS: 76-90+ (6 goals). Ilves: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back the home win ('1') because TPS wins 75% of home matches and keeps a clean sheet in 50% of games, conceding just 0.75 goals per home game on average. Ilves have no away wins (0%), lose 63% of away matches and concede 2.63 goals per away game on average, which strongly favors TPS’s defense. In attack the hosts generate 1.44 xG at home versus Ilves’s 1.5 xG away, while average goals are 1.75 for TPS at home and 1.5 for Ilves away with shot conversion 16% vs 12%. In the last 5 matches TPS scored 8 goals and has 1.4 points per game, Ilves scored 7 goals and 1.0 point per game; both teams conceded 7 goals, but the points balance favors the hosts. Considering the superior defense (0.75 vs 2.63), higher finishing efficiency and strong home record (75% wins), I assign 72% probability to a TPS win, 15% to a draw and 13% to an Ilves win.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
TPSIlves
11Shots19
TPSIlves
2Shots on target6
TPSIlves
1.18xG1.93
TPSIlves
7Corners6
TPSIlves
49Dangerous attacks45
TPSIlves
16Fouls13
TPSIlves
5Cards3
TPSIlves

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.25Goals scored / match1.75
TPSIlves
1.19Goals conceded / match1.88
TPSIlves
47%Average possession49%
TPSIlves
4.38Shots on target / match4.94
TPSIlves

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.69Shots per match11.75
TPSIlves
4.38Shots on target4.94
TPSIlves
10.7%Shot conversion14.9%
TPSIlves
47%Possession49%
TPSIlves
1.45xG for1.44
TPSIlves
1.59xG against1.63
TPSIlves

Shooting quality

TPS: BalancedIlves: Efficient finishing
TPSIlves
Accuracy (shots on target)37%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

TPS
DWLWL
Season result split
38% W25% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-6
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Ilves
WLDLW
Season result split
31% W25% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-7
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.14Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilves is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - TPS · 1.75 goals / match - Ilves

TPS is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.19 goals / match - TPS · 1.88 goals / match - Ilves

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

20Goals scored (season)28
TPSIlves
19Goals conceded (season)30
TPSIlves
2.44Average goals in match3.63
TPSIlves
8Goals scored (last 5)14
TPSIlves
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
TPSIlves

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal94%
TPSIlves
31%2 goals50%
TPSIlves
13%3 goals19%
TPSIlves
0%4 goals6%
TPSIlves

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal75%
TPSIlves
38%2 goals63%
TPSIlves
13%3 goals31%
TPSIlves
0%4 goals13%
TPSIlves

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time31%
TPSIlves
6%BTTS in both halves13%
TPSIlves
25%Scored in both halves38%
TPSIlves

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
TPSIlves
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
TPSIlves
60%BTTS - last 580%
TPSIlves

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
TPSIlves
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time63%
TPSIlves
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time38%
TPSIlves

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
TPSIlves
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
TPSIlves
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
TPSIlves

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilves is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - TPS · 1.38 pts / match - Ilves

TPS - half-time state
19% leading44% draw38% trailing
Ilves - half-time state
38% leading25% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.38
TPSIlves
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.88
TPSIlves
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)1.19
TPSIlves
1.19Average goals (1st half)2.06
TPSIlves
56%Clean sheet before half-time44%
TPSIlves
56%No goal before half-time38%
TPSIlves

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.63
TPSIlves
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
TPSIlves
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
TPSIlves
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.56
TPSIlves
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
TPSIlves
38%No goal after half-time31%
TPSIlves

TPS - second-half results

31% W44% R25% P
16
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ilves - second-half results

44% W31% R25% P
22
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 31%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

TPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match1.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.81.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

TPS
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
5
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
6
5
16-30
4
9
31-45
5
4
46-60
4
2
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-67%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
76%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
152%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

TPSLigaIlves
Average goals in match 2.442.67 3.63
Both teams scored 56%51% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%47% 75%
Clean sheets 31%28% 25%
Goal before half-time 63%75% 88%
Goal after half-time 81%78% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: TPS 0 - 0 - 1 Ilves. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of TPS vs Ilves?

The Veikkausliiga match finished TPS 1:3 Ilves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before TPS vs Ilves?

TPS score 1.25 goals per game on average and Ilves 1.75. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 56% of TPS's matches and 69% of Ilves's.

What form are TPS and Ilves in?

Over the last 5 games TPS have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Ilves 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TPS vs Ilves?

The statistical background for TPS vs Ilves — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.