TPS vs Jaro: match statistics
TPS vs Jaro: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
TPS play Jaro in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match date is 27 June 2026 at 18:00. Venue: Veritas Stadion. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
TPS: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Jaro: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
TPS scores 1.25 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. Jaro scores 0.94 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: TPS 56%, Jaro 50%. Over 2.5: TPS 50%, Jaro 56%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
TPS has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.42. TPS: 11.7 shots per match, Jaro: 11.7.
Match halves
TPS: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.69. Jaro: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.25.
Goals by minute
TPS: 76-90+ (6 goals). Jaro: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Veikkausliiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
I predict a home win (1). TPS wins 67% of matches at home, scores an average of 1.33 goals and concedes only 0.67 goals per game; at home they keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches and fail to score in 0% of matches (always find the net). Jaro have yet to win away (0% wins), average 0.29 goals scored, concede 2.57 goals and fail to score in 71% of away matches, with only 2% shot conversion. The quality gap is clear: TPS records an average of 4 shots on target at home with a 15% conversion, while Jaro have 3.57 shots on target and 2% conversion; the visitors conceded 13 goals in the last 5 matches, compared to just 4 for TPS. Additionally, TPS generate average xG of 1.21 at home with xG against 1.79, but actually concede 0.67 goals per game, indicating solid defence and efficiency, therefore I assess the chances as: home win 70%, draw 18%, Jaro win 12%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| TPS | Jaro | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
TPS is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - TPS · 1 pts / match - Jaro
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
TPS is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1.25 goals / match - TPS · 0.94 goals / match - Jaro
TPS is 68% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.19 goals / match - TPS · 2 goals / match - Jaro
TPS scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
Jaro scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — TPS
Over / Under — Jaro
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Jaro is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - TPS · 1.38 pts / match - Jaro
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
TPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Jaro - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
TPS
Jaro
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| TPS | Liga | Jaro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.44 | 2.67 | ▲ 2.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 51% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 28% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 75% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: TPS 0 - 1 - 0 Jaro. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of TPS vs Jaro?
The Veikkausliiga match finished TPS 3:2 Jaro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before TPS vs Jaro?
TPS score 1.25 goals per game on average and Jaro 0.94. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 56% of TPS's matches and 50% of Jaro's.
What form are TPS and Jaro in?
Over the last 5 games TPS have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Jaro 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TPS vs Jaro?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.