Trans vs Tallinna FC Flora: match statistics
Trans vs Tallinna FC Flora: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Trans played Tallinna FC Flora in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match was played on 8 September 2026. Venue: Kreenholmi Staadion. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Trans: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Tallinna FC Flora: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Trans scores 0.73 and concedes 2.31 goals per match. Tallinna FC Flora scores 1.96 and concedes 1.27. League average: 3.10 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Trans 42%, Tallinna FC Flora 54%. Over 2.5: Trans 69%, Tallinna FC Flora 81%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Tallinna FC Flora has higher xG: 1.96 vs 1.47. Trans: 12.6 shots per match, Tallinna FC Flora: 15.9.
Match halves
Trans: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.31. Tallinna FC Flora: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.04.
Goals by minute
Trans: 31-45+ (5 goals). Tallinna FC Flora: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Meistriliiga: 3.10 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-4. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tallinna FC Flora sit 2nd, while Trans are only 10th, and the full-season record clearly favors the visitors: 15 wins and 49 goals scored compared with the hosts’ 5 victories and 18 goals. Away from home, Flora average 1.75 goals, generate 2.04 xG and register 5.5 shots on target per match, whereas Trans record 1.08 goals and 3.69 shots on target at home. The visitors should control the game more often, as their average possession stands at 60% compared with Trans’ 44%, while the hosts lose as many as 62% of their home matches. Flora’s defense also looks more solid: they concede 1.33 goals per away match with 1.22 xG against, whereas Trans allow opponents 1.69 goals and keep a clean sheet in only 15% of their home games. Although Flora’s last five matches do not show complete consistency, the advantage in chance quality and significantly stronger away statistics point to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by the attacking potential of both sides: Trans score an average of 2.15 goals, while Flora average 1.75, with xG of 1.94 and 2.04 respectively. The hosts allow opponents an xG of 1.58, while Flora concede an average of 1.33 goals per match, giving both teams realistic chances to score. Flora recorded BTTS in 100% of their last five matches and conceded 2.2 goals per game during that period, although Trans recorded BTTS in only 20% of their last five appearances. High average shot numbers—15.54 for Trans and 16.75 for Flora—as well as 77% and 83% of matches featuring at least three goals, suggest an open game. The signal is not conclusive, as Trans keep a clean sheet in 38% of matches, but Flora’s weaker recent defence moderately shifts the forecast towards Goal/Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The goals profile of both teams clearly supports at least two goals: Trans went over the 1.5-goal line in 85% of matches, while Flora did so in 92%. The average number of goals scored is 2.15 for the hosts and 1.75 for the visitors, with both teams averaging 2.2 and 1.8 goals per match respectively over their last five games. Flora conceded as many as 2.2 goals per match during this run, increasing Trans’s chances of contributing to the scoreline despite the opponent’s solid defensive average xG of 1.22. The attacking potential is further reflected in the xG figures: the hosts create an average of 1.94 expected goals, while the visitors record 2.04, producing a forecast of 3.40 total goals. Over 1.5 is the strongest selection, as both teams have always participated in matches featuring at least one goal, while their high rates of games finishing above 1.5 goals clearly reduce the risk of a 0:0 or 1:0 result.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Trans have a clearly stronger first-half profile: they average 1.08 goals before the break compared with Flora’s 0.67, while in their last five matches these figures were 1.4 and 1.2 respectively. The hosts were leading at the break in 60% of their last five games and conceded just 0.4 goals before half-time, whereas Flora allowed an average of 1.0 goal in that period. After the break, Trans still hold a defensive edge, conceding an average of 0.54 goals compared with 0.83 for the visitors, which supports the likelihood of preserving a favorable result. Although Flora have slightly higher season xG, 2.04 versus 1.94, their recent form is weaker: they have lost 3 of their last 5 matches and conceded an average of 2.2 goals per game, compared with 1.4 for Trans. The most likely outcome is therefore a Trans lead at the break followed by a home win at the final whistle, corresponding to the 1/1 HT/FT selection.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Trans | Tallinna FC Flora | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tallinna FC Flora is 800% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Trans · 1.8 pts / match - Tallinna FC Flora
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tallinna FC Flora is 168% better for: goals scored per match.
0.73 goals / match - Trans · 1.96 goals / match - Tallinna FC Flora
Tallinna FC Flora is 82% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.31 goals / match - Trans · 1.27 goals / match - Tallinna FC Flora
Trans scores in 50% of matches (13 of 26 matches), while Tallinna FC Flora keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 matches).
Tallinna FC Flora scores in 88% of matches (23 of 26 matches), while Trans keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Trans
Over / Under - Tallinna FC Flora
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tallinna FC Flora is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.81 pts / match - Trans · 1.54 pts / match - Tallinna FC Flora
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Trans - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tallinna FC Flora - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Trans
Tallinna FC Flora
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).
Teams vs league
| Trans | Liga | Tallinna FC Flora | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.04 | 3.10 | ▲ 3.23 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 59% | ▼ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 65% | ▲ 81% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 12% | 22% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 75% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 96% | 88% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Trans 0 - 2 - 4 Tallinna FC Flora. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Trans vs Tallinna FC Flora?
The Meistriliiga match finished Trans 2:2 Tallinna FC Flora. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Trans and Tallinna FC Flora?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Trans won 0, Tallinna FC Flora won 4 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Trans vs Tallinna FC Flora?
Trans score 0.73 goals per game on average and Tallinna FC Flora 1.96. The Meistriliiga average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Trans's matches and 54% of Tallinna FC Flora's.
What form are Trans and Tallinna FC Flora in?
Over the last 5 games Trans have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Tallinna FC Flora 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Trans vs Tallinna FC Flora?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


