Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

TransMara Sugar vs APS Bomet: match statistics

TransMara Sugar crest
TransMara Sugar
0 : 0half-time 0:0
APS Bomet crest
APS Bomet
150%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

TransMara Sugar displays solid home form with a 33% win rate and 42% clean sheets at their stadium, averaging 0.83 goals scored and 0.75 conceded per game. The hosts hold a positive goal difference of +1 in home matches along with a possession advantage (51%). APS Bomet, on the other hand, struggles on the road with merely a 27% win rate, conceding an average of 1.55 goals per game and holding a negative goal difference of -2. The visitors' form is very poor - just 0.4 PPG in their last 5 matches, without a win in this period. Given the hosts' possession advantage, better home defense, and the visitors' poor away disposition, I predict a victory for TransMara Sugar, although it will not be an easy fixture due to the hosts' tendency to draw (25% in home games).

TransMara Sugar vs APS Bomet: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

TransMara Sugar played APS Bomet in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match was played on 14 March 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

TransMara Sugar: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. APS Bomet: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

TransMara Sugar scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. APS Bomet scores 1.00 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: TransMara Sugar 46%, APS Bomet 58%. Over 2.5: TransMara Sugar 33%, APS Bomet 46%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

TransMara Sugar has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.15. TransMara Sugar: 11.2 shots per match, APS Bomet: 7.1.

Match halves

TransMara Sugar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.25. APS Bomet: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.17.

Goals by minute

TransMara Sugar: 0-15 (18 goals). APS Bomet: 0-15 (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

TransMara Sugar displays solid home form with a 33% win rate and 42% clean sheets at their stadium, averaging 0.83 goals scored and 0.75 conceded per game. The hosts hold a positive goal difference of +1 in home matches along with a possession advantage (51%). APS Bomet, on the other hand, struggles on the road with merely a 27% win rate, conceding an average of 1.55 goals per game and holding a negative goal difference of -2. The visitors' form is very poor - just 0.4 PPG in their last 5 matches, without a win in this period. Given the hosts' possession advantage, better home defense, and the visitors' poor away disposition, I predict a victory for TransMara Sugar, although it will not be an easy fixture due to the hosts' tendency to draw (25% in home games).

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
11Shots11
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0Shots on target0
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
1.04xG1.06
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
6Corners5
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
46Dangerous attacks49
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
-1Fouls-1
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
-1Cards-1
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
1Goals scored / match1
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
1Goals conceded / match1.38
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
43%Average possession45%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
2.71Shots on target / match2.71
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.21Shots per match7.08
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
2.71Shots on target2.71
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
8.9%Shot conversion14.1%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
43%Possession45%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
1.55xG for1.15
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
1.55xG against1.4
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

Shooting quality

TransMara Sugar: BalancedAPS Bomet: Counter-attacking
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
Accuracy (shots on target)24%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

TransMara Sugar is 350% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - TransMara Sugar · 0.4 pts / match - APS Bomet

TransMara Sugar
DWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W50% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-12-6
1.25 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-5
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
APS Bomet
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W33% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-12
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TransMara Sugar is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - TransMara Sugar · 1.38 goals / match - APS Bomet

TransMara Sugar scoring profile: strong

TransMara Sugar scores in 58% of matches (14 of 24 matches), while APS Bomet keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).

APS Bomet scoring profile: strong

APS Bomet scores in 63% of matches (15 of 24 matches), while TransMara Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 matches).

24Goals scored (season)24
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
24Goals conceded (season)33
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
2Average goals in match2.38
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
8Goals scored (last 5)3
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal63%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
33%2 goals25%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
8%3 goals8%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0%4 goals4%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal79%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
21%2 goals38%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
13%3 goals13%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0%4 goals8%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time8%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0%BTTS in both halves4%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
4%Scored in both halves4%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
80%BTTS - last 560%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

13%Min. 1 goal before half-time13%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
8%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

2nd half

25%Min. 1 goal after half-time29%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
8%Min. 2 goals after half-time13%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

TransMara Sugar - half-time state
0% leading92% draw8% trailing
APS Bomet - half-time state
0% leading92% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.92Points per match (1st half)0.92
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0.04Goals scored (1st half)0.08
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0.21Average goals (1st half)0.29
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
88%Clean sheet before half-time88%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
96%No goal before half-time92%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)0.92
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.17
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0.42Average goals (2nd half)0.46
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
88%Clean sheet after half-time75%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
83%No goal after half-time83%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

TransMara Sugar - second-half results

13% W79% R8% P
22
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

APS Bomet - second-half results

4% W79% R17% P
22
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

TransMara Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
APS Bomet - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

TransMara Sugar
ScoredConceded
18
17
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (18 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

APS Bomet
ScoredConceded
19
25
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (19 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (25). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.19
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

TransMara Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 75% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

APS Bomet

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 79% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

TransMara SugarLigaAPS Bomet
Average goals in match 2.002.09 2.38
Both teams scored 46%47% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%35% 46%
Clean sheets 33%33% 21%
Goal before half-time 13%23% 13%
Goal after half-time 25%25% 29%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.05
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+-4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
23%
1 goal
9%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
25%
1 goal
13%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: TransMara Sugar 0 - 1 - 0 APS Bomet. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of TransMara Sugar vs APS Bomet?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished TransMara Sugar 0:0 APS Bomet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before TransMara Sugar vs APS Bomet?

TransMara Sugar score 1.00 goals per game on average and APS Bomet 1.00. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 46% of TransMara Sugar's matches and 58% of APS Bomet's.

What form are TransMara Sugar and APS Bomet in?

Over the last 5 games TransMara Sugar have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and APS Bomet 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TransMara Sugar vs APS Bomet?

The statistical background for TransMara Sugar vs APS Bomet — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.