TS Galaxy vs Magesi: match statistics
TS Galaxy vs Magesi: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
TS Galaxy played Magesi in Premier Soccer League (South Africa). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
TS Galaxy: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Magesi: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
TS Galaxy scores 1.00 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Magesi scores 0.88 and concedes 1.48. League average: 2.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: TS Galaxy 40%, Magesi 44%. Over 2.5: TS Galaxy 36%, Magesi 36%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Magesi has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.28. TS Galaxy: 10.6 shots per match, Magesi: 11.4.
Match halves
TS Galaxy: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.64. Magesi: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.48.
Goals by minute
TS Galaxy: 61-75 (8 goals). Magesi: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier Soccer League: 2.04 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
TS Galaxy has the advantage in home metrics: on average 11.5 shots per game and 3.25 on target, translating to 1.08 goals per game and xG 1.30 at home, while Magesi on the road average 8.92 shots (2 on target), only 0.38 goals per game and xG 1.11. The home side converts chances better (conversion rate 9% vs 4%) and enjoys superior possession (51% vs 43%), giving them clear control of the game. However, TS Galaxy’s recent form is poor: in the last 5 matches they have 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, scoring 2 and conceding 12 goals (0.4–2.4 per game) and earning 0.2 points per match, while Magesi over the same period have 2 wins, 3 losses, a 9:9 goal record and 1.2 points per match. Despite the hosts’ crisis, Magesi have not won away once (0% away wins) and have 62% of away matches go goalless for them, which significantly limits their chances of victory. Therefore I forecast a narrow TS Galaxy win, although a draw remains realistic given both teams’ defensive instability.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I lean BTTS - Yes as the more likely outcome based on a mix of season-long and recent data. The home side averages 1.42 goals scored and concedes 1.50 per match this season, while the visitors average 0.38 scored and 1.46 conceded; the home team posts xG 1.70 versus the visitors' 1.11, indicating TS Galaxy’s edge in chance creation. Over the last 5 matches the visitors have scored 9 goals (1.8 per game), whereas the hosts have scored only 2 (0.4 per game) and conceded 12 (2.4 per game), so the visitors are in scoring form while the hosts have been highly vulnerable recently. Additionally, the hosts average 4.83 shots on target vs. 2.0 for the visitors and have a season BTTS rate of 50% compared to Magesi’s 38% (league 39%), with clean sheets for the hosts rare at 17%, all of which supports a Goal/Goal scenario. Therefore I assign a probability of approximately 62% to BTTS - Yes versus 38% to No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The forecast is based on xG and match averages: TS Galaxy has an attacking xG of 1.70 versus the opponents’ xG against of 1.48, yielding a raw forecast of about 1.59 goals for the home side; Magesi has attacking xG of 1.11 versus Galaxy’s xG against of 1.18, yielding a raw forecast of about 1.15 goals for the away side. After adjusting for real finishing efficiency (Galaxy averages 1.42 goals at home with a 10% conversion, Magesi averages 0.38 goals away with a 4% conversion) I reduce expected values to 1.52 for the home team and 1.04 for the away team, totaling 2.56 goals. Additionally, seasonal percentages show Galaxy home matches finish Over 1.5 goals in 92% of cases, and Magesi matches in 62%, which provides a strong signal for Over 1.5. The 2.5 line looks moderate: Galaxy has Over 2.5 in 42% of home games, Magesi 31% — our expected 2.56 goals implies roughly a 43% probability for Over 2.5, so this is only a moderate signal. The 3.5 line is the weakest signal (25%/15% seasonally for home/away) and yields a low probability for Over 3.5 (~18%), therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
TS Galaxy have a clear superiority in chance creation: home goals average 1.42 versus 0.38 for Magesi, home xG 1.70 versus 1.11 for the visitors, and average shots on target 4.83 versus 2.00. Despite this, the hosts were trailing at the break in 5 of 12 matches (42%), with 4 halftime draws (33%) and only 3 halftime leads (25%), indicating frequent first-half issues. After the break Galaxy dominate: they score 0.92 goals on average in the second half versus 0.08 for Magesi, win second halves in 50% of matches versus 0% for the visitors, and accumulate 1.67 points in second halves compared to 0.46 for their opponents. Additionally, the hosts average 14.08 shots per match (4.83 on target) with a conversion rate of 10% versus 8.92 shots (2.00 on target) and a 4% conversion for the visitors, so the most likely scenario is HT/FT 2/1 (visitors lead at the break, hosts win full-time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| TS Galaxy | Magesi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Magesi is 500% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - TS Galaxy · 1.2 pts / match - Magesi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
TS Galaxy is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - TS Galaxy · 0.88 goals / match - Magesi
TS Galaxy is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.36 goals / match - TS Galaxy · 1.48 goals / match - Magesi
TS Galaxy scores in 52% of matches (13 of 25 matches), while Magesi keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 matches).
Magesi scores in 52% of matches (13 of 25 matches), while TS Galaxy keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - TS Galaxy
Over / Under - Magesi
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
TS Galaxy is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - TS Galaxy · 0.96 pts / match - Magesi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
TS Galaxy - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Magesi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 16%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
TS Galaxy
Magesi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Soccer League).
Teams vs league
| TS Galaxy | Liga | Magesi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.36 | 2.04 | ▲ 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | • 40% | 40% | ▲ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 36% | 32% | ▲ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 36% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 61% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 71% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: TS Galaxy 0 - 0 - 1 Magesi. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of TS Galaxy vs Magesi?
The Premier Soccer League match finished TS Galaxy 0:0 Magesi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before TS Galaxy vs Magesi?
TS Galaxy score 1.00 goals per game on average and Magesi 0.88. The Premier Soccer League average is 2.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 40% of TS Galaxy's matches and 44% of Magesi's.
What form are TS Galaxy and Magesi in?
Over the last 5 games TS Galaxy have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Magesi 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TS Galaxy vs Magesi?
The statistical background for TS Galaxy vs Magesi — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


