Tukums vs Riga: match statistics
Tukums vs Riga: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tukums played Riga in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 20 May 2026. Venue: Tukuma pilsētas stadions. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Tukums: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Riga: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tukums scores 2.08 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Riga scores 3.23 and concedes 1.23. League average: 3.08 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tukums 92%, Riga 69%. Over 2.5: Tukums 69%, Riga 92%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Riga has higher xG: 2.07 vs 1.42. Tukums: 11.2 shots per match, Riga: 17.1.
Match halves
Tukums: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.08. Riga: half-time lead 62%, second-half goals 1.77.
Goals by minute
Tukums: 76-90+ (10 goals). Riga: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 3.08 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-3. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 20%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (Riga) — their season metrics make the difference: 9 wins, 3 draws and only 1 loss versus Tukums’ 2 wins, 7 draws and 4 losses. Riga average 3.43 goals scored on the road with 14.86 shots and 6.71 shots on target, while Tukums at home average 2.43 goals with 11.14 shots and 5.29 shots on target, giving the visitors an offensive edge. The visitors also have higher xG (1.87 vs 1.44) and substantially greater possession (64% vs 44%), indicating better game control and quality of chances. Defensively Riga concede 1.14 goals away with an xG against of 1.06, whereas Tukums concede 1.29 at home with xG against 1.54 — Tukums partially benefits from opponents’ lower finishing, but that does not offset Riga’s advantage. Although Tukums scored 16 goals in the last 5 matches versus Riga’s 13, Riga show clearly better points form (2.2 points per match vs 1.6) and a 71% away win efficiency, so I assign a higher probability to an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams display high season BTTS rates: Tukums 67% and Riga 71%, averaging 69% and exceeding the league level of 60%. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 80% of games for both sides; during that period Tukums averaged 3.2 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, while Riga scored 2.6 and conceded 1.4. Over 2.5 occurs in 83% of Tukums matches and 100% of Riga matches, and the Over 2.5 + BTTS combination is 67% (Tukums) and 71% (Riga), indicating a very high likelihood of matches with goal exchanges. This is supported by xG and shot statistics: Tukums has xG 2.31 versus xG against 0.75, and Riga xG 1.87 versus xG against 1.06, with averages of 6.33 and 6.71 shots on target respectively, confirming both teams create and concede chances. Considering the season average 69%, 80% in the last 5 matches and very high Over 2.5 rates (83%/100%), I project BTTS probability at 79% vs 21%, therefore I tip 'yes' (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: Tukums has an attacking xG of 2.31 and Riga conceding xG of 1.06 — giving roughly 1.69 expected goals for the home side; likewise Riga with attacking xG 1.87 and xG against 0.75 gives 1.31 for the visitors, totaling 3.00 goals. Seasonal and recent trends confirm a high-scoring profile: Tukums averages 3.0 goals per match this season (last 5: 3.2), Riga has a seasonal average of 3.43 (last 5: 2.6), and both teams have 80% of their last 5 matches going over 2.5 goals. Both teams scoring occurs in 67% of Tukums matches and 71% of Riga matches; shots on target 6.33 vs 6.71 and conversion rates 15% vs 23% suggest both sides create and convert chances. Seasonal Over 2.5 rates are 83% for Tukums and 100% for Riga, which together with the expected total of 3.00 provides a strong signal for Over 2.5 — I estimate the probability of Over 2.5 at about 75%. Therefore I recommend betting Over 2.5 as the best line and side to play; the 1.5 line is an even stronger but lower-paying signal (~85%), while Over 3.5 is less likely (~38%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Tukums has a strong start: they led at the break in 4 of 6 matches (67%) and average 1.33 goals by Half-Time while conceding 0.67. In the last 5 meetings the home side averages 1.6 goals by Half-Time versus Riga’s 0.8 (1.6 vs 0.8), which reinforces Tukums’ advantage in the first half. Additionally, Tukums generates higher-quality chances — home xG is 2.31 compared with Riga’s 1.87 xG on the road and Tukums averages 19.83 shots versus Riga’s 14.86, increasing the likelihood of a lead at the break and maintaining that advantage. Full-Time remains open (average goals 3.0 for Tukums vs 3.43 for Riga) and Riga has better shot efficiency (23% vs 15%), but the xG balance and shot ratio suggest the most reliable signal is a home lead and home win, hence the 1/1 selection.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tukums | Riga | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.49 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Riga is 38% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Tukums · 2.2 pts / match - Riga
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Riga is 55% better for: goals scored per match.
2.08 goals / match - Tukums · 3.23 goals / match - Riga
Riga is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.62 goals / match - Tukums · 1.23 goals / match - Riga
Tukums scores in 100% of matches (13 of 13 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
Riga scores in 100% of matches (13 of 13 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tukums
Over / Under - Riga
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.23 pts / match - Tukums · 2 pts / match - Riga
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tukums - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 15%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Riga - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 62% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tukums
Riga
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Tukums | Liga | Riga | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.69 | 3.08 | ▲ 4.46 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 92% | 60% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 55% | ▲ 92% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 21% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 92% | 77% | ▲ 92% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 86% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Tukums 0 - 2 - 3 Riga. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 20% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tukums vs Riga?
The Virsliga match finished Tukums 1:3 Riga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Riga?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Tukums won 0, Riga won 3 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Riga?
Tukums score 2.08 goals per game on average and Riga 3.23. The Virsliga average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 92% of Tukums's matches and 69% of Riga's.
What form are Tukums and Riga in?
Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Riga 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Riga?
The statistical background for Tukums vs Riga — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


