United States - USL League OneData current as of 30 August 2026

Union Omaha vs NY Cosmos: match statistics

Union Omaha crest
Union Omaha
1 : 1half-time 1:1
NY Cosmos crest
NY Cosmos

Union Omaha vs NY Cosmos: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Union Omaha played NY Cosmos in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Union Omaha: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. NY Cosmos: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Union Omaha scores 1.74 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. NY Cosmos scores 1.14 and concedes 2.05. League average: 2.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Union Omaha 61%, NY Cosmos 57%. Over 2.5: Union Omaha 57%, NY Cosmos 71%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Union Omaha has higher xG: 1.94 vs 1.55. Union Omaha: 16.3 shots per match, NY Cosmos: 12.7.

Match halves

Union Omaha: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 1.09. NY Cosmos: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Union Omaha: 76-90+ (15 goals). NY Cosmos: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Union Omaha are the league leaders at home, having won 73% of their home matches without suffering a single defeat, while NY Cosmos have lost as many as 82% of their away games. The hosts average 2.27 goals at home with an xG of 2.24, recording 18.73 shots and 7.18 shots on target per match; away from home, the visitors score just 1.09 goals. Cosmos’ defence concedes an average of 2.64 goals away from home, with an xG conceded of 1.78, which clearly favours Union Omaha’s attacking efficiency. Current form also points to the hosts: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 13 goals and conceding just 4, while Cosmos have scored 7 goals over the same period. The advantage in possession, averaging 61% compared with 51%, along with the home goal difference of +14 versus Cosmos’ away figure of -17, points to a convincing Union Omaha victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is slightly more likely, as NY Cosmos have recorded it in 64% of their matches, while Union Omaha have seen it in as many as 80% of their last five games. The hosts are in very good attacking form: they have scored 13 goals in their last five appearances, with an average xG of 2.27, while Cosmos have conceded as many as 2.64 goals per game throughout the season and have kept a clean sheet in just 9% of matches. However, the visitors should have a realistic chance of finding a response, as they create an average of 1.50 xG per game, while Union Omaha allow opponents 1.48 xG. The hosts' defence increases the risk for this pick, having conceded only 4 goals in their last five matches and kept a clean sheet in 40% of games this season; therefore, the advantage of the both-teams-to-score scenario is not significant.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Union Omaha are in excellent attacking form: they have scored 13 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 2.6 per game, with an xG of 2.27. NY Cosmos concede as many as 2.64 goals per match this season and keep a clean sheet in only 9% of games, which significantly strengthens the prospect of the hosts scoring at least twice. The visitors’ matches have gone Over 1.5 goals in 100% of cases and Over 2.5 goals in 82%, while Union Omaha’s figures stand at 70% and 60%, respectively. The visitors also create chances with an average xG of 1.50, making their goal a realistic addition to the projected 3.05 goals. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5 goals, as the data from both teams clearly limits the likelihood of a tight match with no more than one goal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is Union Omaha leading at the break and securing the win at the final whistle, as the hosts have been ahead at half-time in 75% of their recent matches, scoring an average of 1.5 goals in the first half. NY Cosmos have clear difficulties getting into matches: across the season, they have been behind at half-time in 73% of their appearances and conceded an average of 1.45 goals before the break. Union Omaha’s advantage is also evident in their full-match form: the team has collected 13 points from its last five matches, won 80% of them, and conceded just 0.8 goals per game. The visitors have lost as many as 82% of their matches this season and allow opponents an average of 2.64 goals, so even with their xG at 1.5, the most likely outcome remains the hosts maintaining their lead until the end.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
6Shots13
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
3Shots on target3
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
1.02xG1.52
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
3Corners2
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
59Dangerous attacks68
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
11Fouls15
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
4Cards1
Union OmahaNY Cosmos

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Union OmahaNY Cosmos
1.74Goals scored / match1.14
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
1.13Goals conceded / match2.05
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
58%Average possession47%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
5.87Shots on target / match4.38
Union OmahaNY Cosmos

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.3Shots per match12.67
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
5.87Shots on target4.38
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
10.7%Shot conversion9%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
58%Possession47%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
1.94xG for1.55
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
1.31xG against1.64
Union OmahaNY Cosmos

Shooting quality

Union Omaha: DominantNY Cosmos: Balanced
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Union Omaha is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Union Omaha · 1.4 pts / match - NY Cosmos

Union Omaha
WWWDL
Season result split
61% W13% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-3-6
1.96 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.16Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
NY Cosmos
LLWWD
Season result split
24% W14% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-13
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Union Omaha is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

1.74 goals / match - Union Omaha · 1.14 goals / match - NY Cosmos

Union Omaha is 81% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Union Omaha · 2.05 goals / match - NY Cosmos

Union Omaha scoring profile: very strong

Union Omaha scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while NY Cosmos keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).

NY Cosmos scoring profile: very strong

NY Cosmos scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Union Omaha keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

40Goals scored (season)24
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
26Goals conceded (season)43
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
2.87Average goals in match3.19
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
11Goals scored (last 5)7
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Union OmahaNY Cosmos

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal76%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
65%2 goals29%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
22%3 goals10%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
4%4 goals0%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal76%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
30%2 goals76%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
0%3 goals48%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
0%4 goals5%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time14%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
9%BTTS in both halves10%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
30%Scored in both halves24%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
60%BTTS - last 540%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Union Omaha is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - Union Omaha · 0.71 pts / match - NY Cosmos

Union Omaha - half-time state
22% leading52% draw26% trailing
NY Cosmos - half-time state
10% leading43% draw48% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)0.71
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.29
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)1
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.29
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
48%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
61%No goal before half-time76%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos

After half-time (2nd half)

1.78Points per match (2nd half)1.33
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
1.09Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)1.05
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.9
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
48%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos
35%No goal after half-time24%
Union OmahaNY Cosmos

Union Omaha - second-half results

52% W22% R26% P
27
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding277%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

NY Cosmos - second-half results

38% W19% R43% P
15
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding240%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Union Omaha - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
NY Cosmos - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Union Omaha
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
7
3
16-30
3
6
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
15
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

NY Cosmos
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
4
6
16-30
1
9
31-45
8
11
46-60
2
5
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Union Omaha

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

NY Cosmos

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Union OmahaLigaNY Cosmos
Average goals in match 2.872.96 3.19
Both teams scored 61%59% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%61% 71%
Clean sheets 17%24% 24%
Goal before half-time 65%72% 67%
Goal after half-time 91%81% 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+53%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+29%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Union OmahaGoalMarlon VargasAssist: Laurence Wootton
  2. Union OmahaYellow cardLaurence Wootton
  3. Union OmahaYellow cardBrent Kallman
  4. NY CosmosYellow cardOzzie Ramos
  5. Union OmahaYellow cardCamron Lawrence
  6. Union OmahaYellow cardSamuel Owusu
  7. NY CosmosSubstitutionOn: Darren SidoelOff: Ozzie Ramos
  8. NY CosmosSubstitutionOn: Tino PuentesOff: Nestor Cabrera
  9. Union OmahaSubstitutionOn: Blake MaloneOff: Camron Lawrence
  10. NY CosmosSubstitutionOn: Nicholas ZielonkaOff: Shamit Shome

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Union Omaha 1 - 0 - 0 NY Cosmos. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Union Omaha vs NY Cosmos?

The USL League One match finished Union Omaha 1:1 NY Cosmos. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Union Omaha vs NY Cosmos?

Union Omaha score 1.74 goals per game on average and NY Cosmos 1.14. The USL League One average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Union Omaha's matches and 57% of NY Cosmos's.

What form are Union Omaha and NY Cosmos in?

Over the last 5 games Union Omaha have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and NY Cosmos 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Union Omaha vs NY Cosmos?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.