URA vs KCCA: match statistics
URA vs KCCA: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
URA play KCCA in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 19 May 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
URA: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. KCCA: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
URA scores 0.90 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. KCCA scores 1.53 and concedes 0.73. League average: 2.09 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: URA 40%, KCCA 43%. Over 2.5: URA 27%, KCCA 50%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.
xG, shots and style
KCCA has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.56. URA: 11.0 shots per match, KCCA: 11.8.
Match halves
URA: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40. KCCA: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.77.
Goals by minute
URA: 31-45+ (8 goals). KCCA: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
KCCA is the favorite on paper: they sit 2nd in the table with 18 wins and 42 goals scored this season, while URA are 11th with 4 wins and 24 goals. Recent form underscores the visitors’ edge — KCCA in the last 5 matches have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (2.0 points per game), whereas URA have 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss (0.8 points per game), meaning the home side have failed to win any of their last five fixtures. KCCA’s defensive strength is reflected in fewer goals conceded: 0.86 goals conceded away vs URA’s 1.07 conceded at home, and clean sheet rate 36% vs 29%. However, the hosts create more chances at home: on average 11.86 shots and 5.0 shots on target with xG 1.70, while KCCA away average 10.15 shots, 3.46 shots on target and xG 1.51 — indicating URA can generate chances but finishing is an issue (1.36 goals per home game with a 11% conversion). As a result I predict a KCCA win (2) with probability 55%, draw 25% and home win 20%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| URA | KCCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KCCA is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - URA · 2.2 pts / match - KCCA
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KCCA is 70% better for: goals scored per match.
0.9 goals / match - URA · 1.53 goals / match - KCCA
KCCA is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.97 goals / match - URA · 0.73 goals / match - KCCA
URA scores in 50% of matches (15 of 30 matches), while KCCA keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).
KCCA scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — URA
Over / Under — KCCA
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KCCA is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / match - URA · 1.73 pts / match - KCCA
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
URA - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 17%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
KCCA - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
URA
KCCA
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| URA | Liga | KCCA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.87 | 2.09 | ▲ 2.27 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 40% | 38% | ▲ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 27% | 35% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | • 40% | 39% | • 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 59% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 62% | ▲ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: URA 0 - 0 - 1 KCCA. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of URA vs KCCA?
The Uganda Premier League match finished URA 0:0 KCCA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before URA vs KCCA?
URA score 0.90 goals per game on average and KCCA 1.53. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 40% of URA's matches and 43% of KCCA's.
What form are URA and KCCA in?
Over the last 5 games URA have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and KCCA 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for URA vs KCCA?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for URA vs KCCA: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.