URA vs Vipers: match statistics
URA vs Vipers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
URA played Vipers in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
URA: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Vipers: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
URA scores 0.86 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Vipers scores 1.86 and concedes 0.43. League average: 2.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: URA 43%, Vipers 14%. Over 2.5: URA 43%, Vipers 43%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Vipers has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.18. URA: 5.6 shots per match, Vipers: 8.6.
Match halves
URA: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.57. Vipers: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.14.
Goals by minute
URA: 0-15 (2 goals). Vipers: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uganda Premier League: 2.21 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vipers sit 6th and are unbeaten in their last 5 matches, winning 3, while 15th-placed URA have suffered 4 defeats and drawn once over the same period. The visitors have scored 13 goals and conceded just 1 in those five matches; the hosts have scored 3 and conceded 9. The contrast is especially clear at the respective venues: Vipers have won both away matches, averaging 4.5 goals, while URA have failed to win any of their three home games and have not scored in them. The visitors average 6 shots on target away from home, compared with 3 for the hosts at home, although the gap in the quality of chances created is smaller than the results suggest: their average xG stands at 1.54 and 1.27, respectively. The small sample of home and away matches calls for caution, but Vipers' finishing and the teams' recent results strongly point to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal points to BTTS - No: Vipers have yet to concede in away matches, while URA have failed to score in 50% of their home games. Across their last five matches, Vipers have conceded an average of just 0.2 goals, while URA have scored an average of 0.6, increasing the risk that the hosts will draw a blank. The visitors also have a clear edge in recent attacking form, averaging 2.6 goals scored compared with URA’s 0.6, so both teams do not need to be held scoreless for this pick to land. Some caution is warranted given the hosts’ xG of 1.63 and the 1.31 xG conceded by Vipers, but the visitors’ defensive record so far and the league BTTS rate of 36% still clearly support BTTS - No. This means at least one team is expected not to score; it does not necessarily imply a 0-0 draw.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Vipers have averaged 2.6 goals scored over their last 5 matches, while URA have conceded 1.8 goals per game over the same period, which points to the visitors getting on the scoresheet. Across the season, Vipers' matches have gone Over 1.5 goals in 100% of cases, compared with 50% for URA. However, Vipers' high season average of 4.5 goals scored calls for caution: their average xG is 1.54, so this level of finishing should not be projected directly into the next match. URA have scored just 0.6 goals per game recently, while Vipers have conceded 0.2, so the hosts' contribution to the total could be limited. The 2.75-goal projection offers the strongest edge on Over 1.5 goals, although with the league averaging 2.17 goals per game, higher goal lines carry less certainty.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is Vipers leading at the break and maintaining their advantage through full time: in their last five matches, the visitors led at half-time three times, while URA were trailing at the break three times. Over the same period, Vipers recorded three wins and two draws, whereas URA lost four of their five matches. The visitors’ advantage is not limited to the opening half: after the break, they averaged 1.6 goals across their last five appearances, compared with URA’s 0.2, and did not concede during that period. In their two away matches to date, Vipers led at half-time and won on both occasions, although this small sample limits confidence in the prediction. The xG figures warrant additional caution: URA average 1.63 at home, slightly above Vipers’ away figure of 1.54, so a draw at half-time followed by an away win also has a meaningful chance.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| URA | Vipers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 52% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.21 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Vipers is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - URA · 1.6 pts / match - Vipers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vipers is 116% better for: goals scored per match.
0.86 goals / match - URA · 1.86 goals / match - Vipers
Vipers is 233% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.43 goals / match - URA · 0.43 goals / match - Vipers
URA scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Vipers keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 matches).
Vipers scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - URA
Over / Under - Vipers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vipers is 233% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.43 pts / match - URA · 1.43 pts / match - Vipers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
URA - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Vipers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
URA
Vipers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| URA | Liga | Vipers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.29 | 2.21 | • 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 43% | 40% | ▼ 14% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 43% | 42% | • 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 38% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 61% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 71% | 68% | ▼ 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- URAGoalLoyce Marius Mbaba
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): URA 0 - 1 - 1 Vipers. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of URA vs Vipers?
The Uganda Premier League match finished URA 1:0 Vipers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between URA and Vipers?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches URA won 0, Vipers won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before URA vs Vipers?
URA score 0.86 goals per game on average and Vipers 1.86. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 43% of URA's matches and 14% of Vipers's.
What form are URA and Vipers in?
Over the last 5 games URA have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Vipers 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for URA vs Vipers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for URA vs Vipers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.