UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: match statistics
UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
UTA Arad played Csikszereda in Liga I (Romania). The match was played on 8 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
UTA Arad: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Csikszereda: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
UTA Arad scores 1.38 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Csikszereda scores 1.05 and concedes 1.76. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: UTA Arad 59%, Csikszereda 54%. Over 2.5: UTA Arad 49%, Csikszereda 51%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
UTA Arad has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.25. UTA Arad: 13.4 shots per match, Csikszereda: 11.2.
Match halves
UTA Arad: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.73. Csikszereda: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.49.
Goals by minute
UTA Arad: 76-90+ (15 goals). Csikszereda: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga I: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win for UTA Arad. UTA averages 1.63 goals per home match with average xG of 1.56, while Csikszereda scores only 0.74 goals away and has an xG of 1.09, indicating a clear home advantage in quality of chances created. Defensively the visitors are weak — Csikszereda concedes 2.32 goals on average away with xG against of 1.85, whereas UTA concedes 1.37 at home and keeps a clean sheet in 32% of home matches. UTA also produces more shots (14.16 vs 9.79) and more shots on target (4.42 vs 3.74) with finishing rates of 12% versus the visitors’ 8%, and the visitors fail to score in 42% of their away games (hosts fail to score in 26% of home matches). Although Csikszereda have won 3 of their last 5 and average 2.0 points per match compared to UTA’s 2 wins and 1.6 points, the visitors’ season-long away record (63% losses and -30 goal difference on the road) leads me to assign 65% probability to the home side, 20% to a draw and 15% to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season statistics favor the 'Both Teams To Score' scenario: UTA Arad has BTTS at 67% at home, while Csikszereda records 42% away, and the league average BTTS is 52%. UTA scores an average of 1.39 goals per home match with xG 1.41 and 51 goals this season, while the visitors concede as many as 2.32 goals per match and have 65 goals conceded — a strong signal that the home side should find the net. Conversely, the visitors' scoring chance is less obvious: Csikszereda has only 0.74 goals per season and a shot conversion around 8%, but in the last 5 matches they have xG 1.45 and have scored 5 goals (1.0 average), which increases the likelihood of them scoring. Both teams allow high xG against (1.84 and 1.85), and UTA at home averages more shots (12.72 with 4.39 on target) than the visitors (9.79 and 3.74), which favors open play and goal exchanges. On this basis I give a stronger signal for BTTS — 65% for 'Yes' versus 35% for 'No', because the high home BTTS rate and the visitors' defensive vulnerability outweigh the visitors' weaker season scoring metrics.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I recommend Over 1.5 as the main pick: UTA Arad have 83% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Csikszereda 74%, and the league averages 2.54 goals per game, which strongly signals at least two goals (I rate Over 1.5 at 88%). Expected goals were calculated by combining xG and seasonal averages: for the home side xG_for 1.41 vs guests' xG_against 1.85 yields 1.63, while seasonal figures (1.39 scored vs 2.32 conceded by the visitors) give 1.86; their average is ~1.74 goals for UTA. For Csikszereda similarly xG_for 1.09 and hosts' xG_against 1.84 give 1.47, while seasonal values (0.74 scored vs 1.17 conceded) give 0.96; the average is ~1.21 goals for the away side, totaling ~2.95 expected goals. Support comes from UTA’s activity: 12.72 shots and 4.39 on target on average vs guests' 9.79 and 3.74, and conversion rates 11% vs 8%; BTTS is 67% for the home side and 42% for the visitors, increasing the likelihood of goals from both teams. As a result I assess Over 2.5 as moderately likely (~62%), Over 3.5 as less likely (~33%), so the best and strongest position is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1). UTA Arad led at the break in 28% of their matches and were level at half-time in 56%, indicating a strong probability of a draw after 45 minutes. The hosts score an average of 1.39 goals per game versus Csikszereda’s 0.74, have a higher xG (1.41 vs 1.09) and more shots (12.72 vs 9.79) and shots on target (4.39 vs 3.74), which increases the chance of a turnaround in the second half. The visitors concede an average of 1.21 goals before the break and 1.11 in the second half, so after a draw the hosts have a realistic advantage to see out the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| UTA Arad | Csikszereda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Csikszereda is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - UTA Arad · 2 pts / match - Csikszereda
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
UTA Arad is 31% better for: goals scored per match.
1.38 goals / match - UTA Arad · 1.05 goals / match - Csikszereda
UTA Arad is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.38 goals / match - UTA Arad · 1.76 goals / match - Csikszereda
UTA Arad scores in 73% of matches (27 of 37 matches), while Csikszereda keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 37 matches).
Csikszereda scores in 73% of matches (27 of 37 matches), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 19% (7 of 37 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - UTA Arad
Over / Under - Csikszereda
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
UTA Arad is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.35 pts / match - UTA Arad · 1.03 pts / match - Csikszereda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
UTA Arad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Csikszereda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
UTA Arad
Csikszereda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| UTA Arad | Liga | Csikszereda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.76 | 2.54 | ▲ 2.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 52% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 49% | 47% | ▲ 51% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 27% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 68% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 76% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): UTA Arad 0 - 1 - 1 Csikszereda. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?
The Liga I match finished UTA Arad 1:0 Csikszereda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between UTA Arad and Csikszereda?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches UTA Arad won 0, Csikszereda won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?
UTA Arad score 1.38 goals per game on average and Csikszereda 1.05. The Liga I average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 59% of UTA Arad's matches and 54% of Csikszereda's.
What form are UTA Arad and Csikszereda in?
Over the last 5 games UTA Arad have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Csikszereda 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


