Romania - Liga IData current as of 20 October 2026

UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: match statistics

UTA Arad crest
UTA Arad
5 : 1half-time 1:0
Csikszereda crest
Csikszereda

UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

UTA Arad played Csikszereda in Liga I (Romania). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Final score: 5:1.

Current form

UTA Arad: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Csikszereda: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

UTA Arad scores 0.86 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Csikszereda scores 0.57 and concedes 1.86. League average: 2.40 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: UTA Arad 43%, Csikszereda 29%. Over 2.5: UTA Arad 57%, Csikszereda 43%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

UTA Arad has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.05. UTA Arad: 15.0 shots per match, Csikszereda: 8.6.

Match halves

UTA Arad: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.71. Csikszereda: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.29.

Goals by minute

UTA Arad: 76-90+ (3 goals). Csikszereda: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga I: 2.40 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

UTA Arad remain unbeaten at home, drawing all three matches played so far, while their defence concedes just 0.67 goals per game there and keeps a clean sheet in 67% of appearances. Csikszereda have lost all four away matches, averaging only 0.5 goals scored, and fail to score in 75% of such fixtures. The hosts create significantly better chances, recording an average home xG of 1.68 compared with Csikszereda’s away xG of 0.94, while their opponents allow 1.97 xG. UTA also average 17 shots per home game, compared with just 7 attempts from the visitors, which should translate into clearer control of the match. However, UTA’s limited finishing—scoring 0.67 goals per home game and failing to score in 67% of appearances—increases the risk of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS figures are clearly low: UTA Arad have seen this outcome in 33% of their matches, while Csikszereda have recorded it in just 25%, compared with the league average of 47%. Both teams have serious problems in front of goal, averaging just 0.67 and 0.50 goals per game respectively, while the hosts have failed to score in 67% of their matches and the visitors in as many as 75%. Over their last five games, Csikszereda improved their scoring average to 1.2, but UTA scored only 0.8 goals and conceded just 0.8 per match. The visitors’ xG stands at 0.94 for the season and 1.12 over their last five games, which does not provide a strong basis for regularly breaking down the hosts’ defence. BTTS - Yes is not the more likely outcome, as the data primarily points to a genuine risk that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The profile of both teams points to limited goalscoring potential: UTA Arad scores an average of 0.67 goals, while Csikszereda averages 0.50 goals per match. Although both defenses allow opponents to generate a high xG—1.86 and 1.97, respectively—shot conversion remains low at just 6% for the home side and 7% for the visitors. In their last five matches, UTA recorded an average of 1.6 total goals, while Csikszereda’s games averaged 2.8 goals; however, only 3 of its last 5 matches went Over 2.5 goals. The Under 3.5 line is also supported by the season data, as this outcome occurred in 67% of UTA’s matches and 75% of Csikszereda’s fixtures. The projected total of 2.30 goals provides a clear buffer below four goals, making Under 3.5 goals the best choice.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time, as UTA were level after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches, compared with 40% for Csikszereda; over the course of the current season, the visitors have had a level score at the break in as many as 75% of their matches. In their last five first halves, the hosts scored just 0.2 goals and conceded the same number, clearly indicating the likelihood of a cautious, frequently goalless opening. After the interval, the advantage should shift towards UTA: Csikszereda concede an average of 1.25 goals in second halves, while UTA concede just 0.33. UTA also have the higher average xG, 1.20 compared with 0.94, and in their last five matches they conceded an average of 0.8 goals, compared with 1.6 for the visitors. Csikszereda’s poor run, including defeats in 60% of their last five appearances, further strengthens the HT/FT draw/UTA win scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
4 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
UTA AradCsikszereda
16Shots10
UTA AradCsikszereda
6Shots on target4
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.76xG1.11
UTA AradCsikszereda
4Corners3
UTA AradCsikszereda
45Dangerous attacks27
UTA AradCsikszereda
17Fouls16
UTA AradCsikszereda
1Cards1
UTA AradCsikszereda

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

UTA AradCsikszereda
0.86Goals scored / match0.57
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.43Goals conceded / match1.86
UTA AradCsikszereda
47%Average possession42%
UTA AradCsikszereda
3.57Shots on target / match3.57
UTA AradCsikszereda

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15Shots per match8.57
UTA AradCsikszereda
3.57Shots on target3.57
UTA AradCsikszereda
5.7%Shot conversion6.7%
UTA AradCsikszereda
47%Possession42%
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.54xG for1.05
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.28xG against1.92
UTA AradCsikszereda

Shooting quality

UTA Arad: AttackingCsikszereda: Balanced
UTA AradCsikszereda
Accuracy (shots on target)24%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.16

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

UTA Arad is 400% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - UTA Arad · 0.2 pts / match - Csikszereda

UTA Arad
LDLDW
Season result split
14% W43% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-3
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-0
Last 5 at home
0-3-0
DDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Csikszereda
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W14% D86% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-6
0.14 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-4
Last 5 away
0-0-4
LLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.96Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UTA Arad is 51% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - UTA Arad · 0.57 goals / match - Csikszereda

UTA Arad is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.43 goals / match - UTA Arad · 1.86 goals / match - Csikszereda

UTA Arad scoring profile: strong

UTA Arad scores in 43% of matches (3 of 7 matches), while Csikszereda keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

Csikszereda scoring profile: mixed

Csikszereda scores in 29% of matches (2 of 7 matches), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

6Goals scored (season)4
UTA AradCsikszereda
10Goals conceded (season)13
UTA AradCsikszereda
2.29Average goals in match2.43
UTA AradCsikszereda
4Goals scored (last 5)4
UTA AradCsikszereda
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
UTA AradCsikszereda

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal29%
UTA AradCsikszereda
29%2 goals29%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%3 goals0%
UTA AradCsikszereda
0%4 goals0%
UTA AradCsikszereda

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal86%
UTA AradCsikszereda
43%2 goals57%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%3 goals43%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%4 goals0%
UTA AradCsikszereda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time29%
UTA AradCsikszereda
0%BTTS in both halves14%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%Scored in both halves29%
UTA AradCsikszereda

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
UTA AradCsikszereda
40%BTTS - last 540%
UTA AradCsikszereda

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time43%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
UTA AradCsikszereda
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
UTA AradCsikszereda

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
UTA AradCsikszereda
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
UTA AradCsikszereda
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
UTA AradCsikszereda

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTA Arad is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - UTA Arad · 0.57 pts / match - Csikszereda

UTA Arad - half-time state
14% leading57% draw29% trailing
Csikszereda - half-time state
0% leading57% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.57
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.14Goals scored (1st half)0.29
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)1
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.57Average goals (1st half)1.29
UTA AradCsikszereda
71%Clean sheet before half-time57%
UTA AradCsikszereda
86%No goal before half-time71%
UTA AradCsikszereda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)0.86
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.29
UTA AradCsikszereda
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.14
UTA AradCsikszereda
43%Clean sheet after half-time43%
UTA AradCsikszereda
57%No goal after half-time71%
UTA AradCsikszereda

UTA Arad - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
7
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Csikszereda - second-half results

14% W43% D43% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.57
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UTA Arad - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Csikszereda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

UTA Arad
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Csikszereda
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.36
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-58%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
12%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
40%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

UTA Arad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
177%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Csikszereda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.87
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).

Teams vs league

UTA AradLigaCsikszereda
Average goals in match▼ 2.292.40• 2.43
Both teams scored▼ 43%46%▼ 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 57%44%• 43%
Clean sheets▼ 29%33%▼ 14%
Goal before half-time▼ 43%63%▼ 43%
Goal after half-time• 71%72%• 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.40
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
0.81
Away goals / match
+98%
Home attack advantage
+49%
Home defence advantage
+35%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. UTA AradYellow cardSabahudin Alomeroviс
  2. CsikszeredaYellow cardSzilard Veres
  3. CsikszeredaSubstitutionOn: Darius Cristian BotaOff: Előd Tóth-Pál
  4. CsikszeredaSubstitutionOn: Ádám CzékusOff: Artúr Horváth
  5. UTA AradGoalMarinos Tzionis
  6. CsikszeredaGoalMarton EppelAssist: Ádám Czékus
  7. CsikszeredaSubstitutionOn: Mátyás TajtiOff: Szilard Veres
  8. CsikszeredaSubstitutionOn: Szabolcs SzalayOff: Albert Tivadar Stahl
  9. UTA AradGoalSota MinoAssist: Alin Roman
  10. UTA AradGoalAndrea Padula

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): UTA Arad 1 - 1 - 1 Csikszereda. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?

The Liga I match finished UTA Arad 5:1 Csikszereda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between UTA Arad and Csikszereda?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches UTA Arad won 1, Csikszereda won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?

UTA Arad score 0.86 goals per game on average and Csikszereda 0.57. The Liga I average is 2.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 43% of UTA Arad's matches and 29% of Csikszereda's.

What form are UTA Arad and Csikszereda in?

Over the last 5 games UTA Arad have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Csikszereda 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.