Romania - Liga IData current as of 04 September 2026

UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

UTA Arad play Csikszereda in Liga I (Romania). The match date is 5 September 2026.

Current form

UTA Arad: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Csikszereda: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

UTA Arad scores 0.86 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Csikszereda scores 0.57 and concedes 1.86. League average: 2.40 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: UTA Arad 43%, Csikszereda 29%. Over 2.5: UTA Arad 57%, Csikszereda 43%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

UTA Arad has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.05. UTA Arad: 15.0 shots per match, Csikszereda: 8.6.

Match halves

UTA Arad: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.71. Csikszereda: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.29.

Goals by minute

UTA Arad: 76-90+ (3 goals). Csikszereda: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga I: 2.40 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

UTA AradCsikszereda
0.86Goals scored / match0.57
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.43Goals conceded / match1.86
UTA AradCsikszereda
47%Average possession42%
UTA AradCsikszereda
3.57Shots on target / match3.57
UTA AradCsikszereda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15Shots per match8.57
UTA AradCsikszereda
3.57Shots on target3.57
UTA AradCsikszereda
5.7%Shot conversion6.7%
UTA AradCsikszereda
47%Possession42%
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.54xG for1.05
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.28xG against1.92
UTA AradCsikszereda

Shooting quality

UTA Arad: AttackingCsikszereda: Balanced
UTA AradCsikszereda
Accuracy (shots on target)24%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.16

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

UTA Arad is 400% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - UTA Arad · 0.2 pts / match - Csikszereda

UTA Arad
LDLDW
Season result split
14% W43% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-3
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-0
Last 5 at home
0-3-0
DDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Csikszereda
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W14% R86% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-6
0.14 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-4
Last 5 away
0-0-4
LLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.96Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UTA Arad is 51% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - UTA Arad · 0.57 goals / match - Csikszereda

UTA Arad is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.43 goals / match - UTA Arad · 1.86 goals / match - Csikszereda

UTA Arad scoring profile: strong

UTA Arad scores in 43% of matches (3 of 7 matches), while Csikszereda keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

Csikszereda scoring profile: mixed

Csikszereda scores in 29% of matches (2 of 7 matches), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

6Goals scored (season)4
UTA AradCsikszereda
10Goals conceded (season)13
UTA AradCsikszereda
2.29Average goals in match2.43
UTA AradCsikszereda
4Goals scored (last 5)4
UTA AradCsikszereda
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
UTA AradCsikszereda

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal29%
UTA AradCsikszereda
29%2 goals29%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%3 goals0%
UTA AradCsikszereda
0%4 goals0%
UTA AradCsikszereda

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal86%
UTA AradCsikszereda
43%2 goals57%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%3 goals43%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%4 goals0%
UTA AradCsikszereda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time29%
UTA AradCsikszereda
0%BTTS in both halves14%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%Scored in both halves29%
UTA AradCsikszereda

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
UTA AradCsikszereda
40%BTTS - last 540%
UTA AradCsikszereda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time43%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
UTA AradCsikszereda
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
UTA AradCsikszereda

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
UTA AradCsikszereda
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
UTA AradCsikszereda
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
UTA AradCsikszereda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTA Arad is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - UTA Arad · 0.57 pts / match - Csikszereda

UTA Arad - half-time state
14% leading57% draw29% trailing
Csikszereda - half-time state
0% leading57% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.57
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.14Goals scored (1st half)0.29
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)1
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.57Average goals (1st half)1.29
UTA AradCsikszereda
71%Clean sheet before half-time57%
UTA AradCsikszereda
86%No goal before half-time71%
UTA AradCsikszereda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)0.86
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.29
UTA AradCsikszereda
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.14
UTA AradCsikszereda
43%Clean sheet after half-time43%
UTA AradCsikszereda
57%No goal after half-time71%
UTA AradCsikszereda

UTA Arad - second-half results

29% W43% R29% P
7
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Csikszereda - second-half results

14% W43% R43% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.57
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UTA Arad - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Csikszereda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

UTA Arad
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Csikszereda
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.36
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-58%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
12%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
40%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

UTA Arad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
170%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Csikszereda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.87
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).

Teams vs league

UTA AradLigaCsikszereda
Average goals in match 2.292.40 2.43
Both teams scored 43%47% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%44% 43%
Clean sheets 29%32% 14%
Goal before half-time 43%64% 43%
Goal after half-time 71%73% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.40
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.56
Home goals / match
0.84
Away goals / match
+86%
Home attack advantage
+46%
Home defence advantage
+35%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): UTA Arad 1 - 1 - 1 Csikszereda. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

When do UTA Arad and Csikszereda play?

UTA Arad face Csikszereda on 5 September 2026 in Liga I. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between UTA Arad and Csikszereda?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches UTA Arad won 1, Csikszereda won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?

UTA Arad score 0.86 goals per game on average and Csikszereda 0.57. The Liga I average is 2.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 43% of UTA Arad's matches and 29% of Csikszereda's.

What form are UTA Arad and Csikszereda in?

Over the last 5 games UTA Arad have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Csikszereda 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.