Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 20 July 2026

UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès: match statistics

UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat
2 : 0half-time 0:0
CODM Meknès crest
CODM Meknès

UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

UTS Rabat play CODM Meknès in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 17 June 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

UTS Rabat: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. CODM Meknès: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

UTS Rabat scores 1.07 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. CODM Meknès scores 0.80 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: UTS Rabat 63%, CODM Meknès 40%. Over 2.5: UTS Rabat 33%, CODM Meknès 33%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

UTS Rabat has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.11. UTS Rabat: 9.5 shots per match, CODM Meknès: 9.1.

Match halves

UTS Rabat: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57. CODM Meknès: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (9 goals). CODM Meknès: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

UTS Rabat holds a form advantage in recent matches: in their last five games the hosts scored 4 goals and averaged 1.6 points per match, while CODM Meknès scored 5 goals but only 0.8 points per match. In offensive metrics UTS shows higher efficiency at home — on average 0.92 goals per game, 3.17 shots on target and a 11% conversion rate, versus 0.45 goals, 2.18 shots on target and a 5% conversion rate for the away side. The quality of created chances is, however, similar: xG for UTS is 1.13 against 1.12 for CODM, which suggests a comparable number of opportunities but superior finishing by the hosts. Risks for UTS include no home wins this season (0% home wins) and a negative home goal difference (-7), while CODM have a high share of matches without scoring on the road (64%) and have conceded 8 goals in the last 5 matches. Considering the hosts’ better recent form and markedly greater home finishing efficiency, I forecast an UTS victory; estimated probabilities are 50% home, 30% draw and 20% away.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
10Shots6
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
7Shots on target1
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1.54xG0.72
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
7Corners2
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
56Dangerous attacks37
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
14Fouls11
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
4Cards3
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1.07Goals scored / match0.8
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1.33Goals conceded / match1.1
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
47%Average possession50%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
4.03Shots on target / match2.6
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match9.1
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
4.03Shots on target2.6
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
11.2%Shot conversion8.8%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
47%Possession50%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1.3xG for1.11
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1.35xG against1.36
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

Shooting quality

UTS Rabat: BalancedCODM Meknès: Balanced
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
Accuracy (shots on target)42%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

UTS Rabat is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - UTS Rabat · 1 pts / match - CODM Meknès

UTS Rabat
LLDWW
Season result split
20% W43% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-13-11
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-7-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
CODM Meknès
LDDWL
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-12
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-6-8
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UTS Rabat is 34% better for: goals scored per match.

1.07 goals / match - UTS Rabat · 0.8 goals / match - CODM Meknès

CODM Meknès is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - UTS Rabat · 1.1 goals / match - CODM Meknès

UTS Rabat scoring profile: strong

UTS Rabat scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while CODM Meknès keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).

CODM Meknès scoring profile: very strong

CODM Meknès scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

32Goals scored (season)24
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
40Goals conceded (season)33
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
2.4Average goals in match1.9
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
6Goals scored (last 5)7
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal60%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
27%2 goals17%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
7%3 goals3%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
0%4 goals0%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal63%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
30%2 goals37%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
10%3 goals10%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
7%4 goals0%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time7%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
7%BTTS in both halves3%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
13%Scored in both halves3%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
60%BTTS - last 580%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time43%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTS Rabat is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - UTS Rabat · 0.9 pts / match - CODM Meknès

UTS Rabat - half-time state
20% leading57% draw23% trailing
CODM Meknès - half-time state
10% leading60% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)0.9
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.2
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1.07Average goals (1st half)0.7
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
57%Clean sheet before half-time67%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
63%No goal before half-time83%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per match (2nd half)1.33
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.2
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
37%Clean sheet after half-time47%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
50%No goal after half-time53%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

UTS Rabat - second-half results

20% W43% R37% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CODM Meknès - second-half results

30% W43% R27% P
27
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UTS Rabat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
CODM Meknès - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.402.20
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
11
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
7
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

CODM Meknès
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
6
31-45
9
1
46-60
3
5
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

CODM Meknès

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

UTS RabatLigaCODM Meknès
Average goals in match 2.402.17 1.90
Both teams scored 63%52% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%38% 33%
Clean sheets 13%30% 37%
Goal before half-time 53%63% 43%
Goal after half-time 80%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: UTS Rabat 0 - 1 - 0 CODM Meknès. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?

The Botola Pro match finished UTS Rabat 2:0 CODM Meknès. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?

UTS Rabat score 1.07 goals per game on average and CODM Meknès 0.80. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 63% of UTS Rabat's matches and 40% of CODM Meknès's.

What form are UTS Rabat and CODM Meknès in?

Over the last 5 games UTS Rabat have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and CODM Meknès 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.