UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics
UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
UTS Rabat play Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 2 July 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
UTS Rabat: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Ittihad Tanger: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
UTS Rabat scores 1.07 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Ittihad Tanger scores 0.90 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: UTS Rabat 63%, Ittihad Tanger 53%. Over 2.5: UTS Rabat 33%, Ittihad Tanger 27%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. UTS Rabat: 9.5 shots per match, Ittihad Tanger: 10.4.
Match halves
UTS Rabat: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57. Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57.
Goals by minute
UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (9 goals). Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
I predict a win for Ittihad Tanger (2). The visitors sit 7th versus the hosts’ 15th and have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while UTS Rabat has won only 1 of five (points per match in last 5: visitors 2.0 vs hosts 1.0). Ittihad creates more chances and has higher away xG — averaging 10.36 shots and xG 1.35 per match, versus 8.43 shots and xG 1.18 for the hosts. Defensively the visitors also fare better: UTS conceded 39 goals this season and 1.43 goals per home match, while Ittihad conceded 29 goals this season and 1.14 away; the hosts do have better home conversion (12% vs 8%) but rarely win at home (7% wins and 50% draws). Considering form, higher xG (1.35 vs 1.18) and lower average goals conceded (1.14 vs 1.43), I give the edge to the visitors, with a moderate risk of a draw due to UTS’s tendency to draw at home.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| UTS Rabat | Ittihad Tanger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
UTS Rabat is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.07 goals / match - UTS Rabat · 0.9 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger
Ittihad Tanger is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - UTS Rabat · 1.03 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger
UTS Rabat scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).
Ittihad Tanger scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — UTS Rabat
Over / Under — Ittihad Tanger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
UTS Rabat is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / match - UTS Rabat · 1.07 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
UTS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ittihad Tanger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
UTS Rabat
Ittihad Tanger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| UTS Rabat | Liga | Ittihad Tanger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.40 | 2.17 | ▼ 1.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 52% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 38% | ▼ 27% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 30% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 63% | • 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 73% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: UTS Rabat 0 - 1 - 0 Ittihad Tanger. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger?
The Botola Pro match finished UTS Rabat 1:0 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger?
UTS Rabat score 1.07 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 0.90. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 63% of UTS Rabat's matches and 53% of Ittihad Tanger's.
What form are UTS Rabat and Ittihad Tanger in?
Over the last 5 games UTS Rabat have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger?
The statistical background for UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.