Valur vs FH: match statistics
Valur vs FH: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Valur played FH in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Origovöllurinn. Final score: 3:5.
Current form
Valur: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. FH: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Valur scores 1.83 and concedes 1.96 goals per match. FH scores 1.46 and concedes 1.71. League average: 3.88 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Valur 75%, FH 63%. Over 2.5: Valur 71%, FH 54%. League level: BTTS 72%, Over 2.5 70%.
xG, shots and style
Valur has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.70. Valur: 15.8 shots per match, FH: 14.0.
Match halves
Valur: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00. FH: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.58.
Goals by minute
Valur: 76-90+ (15 goals). FH: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Úrvalsdeild: 3.88 goals per match, BTTS 72%, Over 2.5 70%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 40%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Valur have the home advantage: they average 2.17 goals per match at home, while FH score 1.09 goals away. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 2.05 xG compared with the visitors’ 1.42, and register 6.42 shots on target to FH’s 4.18. However, their defence remains a weak point: Valur concede an average of 2.33 goals at home and have kept a clean sheet in just 8% of those matches. FH have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 11 goals in the process, so they could exploit these defensive issues despite losing 45% of their away games. Valur’s superior chance creation and FH’s struggles on the road point to a home win, although the risk of conceding is high.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS landed in 69% of Valur’s matches and 55% of FH’s, with those figures rising to 80% and 60%, respectively, over the last five rounds. Valur average 1.77 goals scored, while FH concede 2.00, making a goal for the home side look likely. The visitors score only 1.09 goals per match and have failed to score in 36% of their games, but Valur concede an average of 1.46 goals, with opponents recording an xG of 1.92. FH’s improved attack also supports the prospect of an away goal: in their last five matches, the visitors averaged 2.2 goals and generated an xG of 1.83. The risk that either team fails to score remains significant, but the overall figures, together with the league BTTS rate of 72%, point towards BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Valur score an average of 1.77 goals per match, while FH concede 2.00; average xG figures are 1.93 for the home side’s attack and 2.16 for the visitors’ defence, which points to Valur getting on the scoresheet. FH average 1.09 goals scored, but Valur concede 1.46, so the visitors also have a chance to add a goal. Valur’s last five matches have averaged 3.2 goals, and FH’s matches have also averaged 3.2; both teams went over 2.5 goals in 60% of those games. The strongest signal, however, is for Over 1.5 goals: it landed in 85% of Valur’s matches and 73% of FH’s matches this season. With a projected total of 3.35 goals, this offers greater confidence than backing Over 2.5 or Over 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest indication that Valur will lead at the break is its average of 1.15 first-half goals scored, compared with the 1.18 goals FH concede during that period. Valur led at half-time in 46% of its matches, while FH were trailing at the break in 45%, supporting the 1/1 scenario. Across the full match, the hosts average 1.77 goals compared with 1.09 for the visitors, who concede an average of 2.00; Valur’s attacking advantage is also reflected in the xG figures of 1.93 versus 1.42 for FH. However, this is not a certain pick: FH have won 3 of their last 5 matches and led at half-time in 3 of them, so outcomes involving the visitors taking the lead also warrant a meaningful share. Despite FH’s improved form, Valur’s season-long advantage both before half-time and in goals scored makes a home lead at the break followed by a full-time win the most likely individual scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Valur | FH | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FH is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Valur · 2 pts / match - FH
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Valur is 25% better for: goals scored per match.
1.83 goals / match - Valur · 1.46 goals / match - FH
FH is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.96 goals / match - Valur · 1.71 goals / match - FH
Valur scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).
FH scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while Valur keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Valur
Over / Under - FH
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FH is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / match - Valur · 1.38 pts / match - FH
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Valur - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
FH - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Valur
FH
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| Valur | Liga | FH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.79 | 3.88 | ▼ 3.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 72% | ▼ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 71% | 70% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 16% | ▲ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 81% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | • 88% | 87% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Valur 2 - 1 - 2 FH. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Valur vs FH?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished Valur 3:5 FH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Valur and FH?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Valur won 2, FH won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Valur vs FH?
Valur score 1.83 goals per game on average and FH 1.46. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Valur's matches and 63% of FH's.
What form are Valur and FH in?
Over the last 5 games Valur have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and FH 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Valur vs FH?
The statistical background for Valur vs FH — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.