Ukraine - Ukrainian Premier LeagueObolon' ArenaData current as of 07 September 2026

Veres vs Zorya: match statistics

Veres crest
Veres
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Zorya crest
Zorya

Veres vs Zorya: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Veres played Zorya in Ukrainian Premier League (Ukraine). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Obolon' Arena. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Veres: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match. Zorya: 2-0-2, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Veres scores 0.50 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Zorya scores 1.25 and concedes 1.75. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Veres 25%, Zorya 50%. Over 2.5: Veres 25%, Zorya 75%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Zorya has higher xG: 1.63 vs 0.79. Veres: 4.3 shots per match, Zorya: 10.5.

Match halves

Veres: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. Zorya: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Veres: 46-60 (1 goals). Zorya: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ukrainian Premier League: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Zorya are showing better current form, collecting 9 points from their last 5 matches compared with Veres’ 7, while scoring 11 goals to their opponents’ 6 during that period. Away from home, the visitors have won all of their matches so far, averaging 2 goals scored and conceding just 1 per game, whereas Veres have lost both of their home fixtures. The hosts average 7 shots per match and record an xG of 0.86, indicating limited consistency in chance creation, although their 3 shots on target per game could give them a chance to score. Zorya are clearly more efficient in converting their shots, turning 33% of attempts into goals compared with Veres’ 14%. Neither defence has kept a clean sheet yet, but the visitors’ superior away record and recent attacking efficiency point towards a Zorya victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal comes from recent form: both Veres and Zorya recorded BTTS in only 40% of their last five matches, while the league average is just 33%. During this period, Veres conceded an average of 0.8 goals per match and kept a clean sheet in 33% of their season matches, increasing the likelihood of Zorya failing to score. The hosts do have a high season xG of 2.06 and average 18.5 shots, but their xG over the last five matches has dropped to 0.79. Zorya have recently scored 2.2 goals per match, but their 1.63 xG is up against a solid Veres defence that allows opponents just 0.96 xG over the season. BTTS - Yes is possible given that Zorya have not yet kept a clean sheet, but the more likely outcome remains BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team will fail to score—not necessarily a 0:0 draw or both teams failing to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In all previous meetings between the two teams, at least 2 goals were scored, while Zorya’s matches also exceeded the 2.5-goal line in 100% of cases. Zorya averages 2.2 goals in its last five appearances, while Veres conceded only 0.8 goals during this period, which limits confidence in a high-scoring game but does not undermine the scenario of two goals. The hosts create plenty of chances at home: their average xG is 2.06, with 18.5 shots and 7 shots on target per match, while Zorya allows an average xG of 1.41 away from home. At the same time, Veres’ recent xG has dropped to 0.79, meaning Over 2.5 goals has only a moderate edge, whereas Over 1.5 goals is the strongest choice with a projected total of 2.57 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time followed by a Zorya win is the most likely HT/FT scenario, as Veres have been level at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches and have scored just 0.2 goals per game before half-time. Zorya have also not started matches particularly aggressively: in their last five appearances, they averaged 0.4 goals in the first half, while their average total number of goals before the break was just 0.8. However, the visitors’ advantage should increase after the interval, as Zorya have averaged 1.8 goals in the second halves of their last five matches, with at least two goals scored after the break in each of those games. Zorya won 60% of their last five matches and averaged 2.2 goals per game, compared with Veres’ average of just 1.2. Although the hosts create more chances, recording an xG of 2.06 and 18.5 shots per match versus Zorya’s xG of 0.77, their conversion rate is only 8%, while the visitors convert 33% of their shots, reinforcing the scenario of a turnaround after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
VeresZorya
5Shots6
VeresZorya
4Shots on target4
VeresZorya
0.94xG1.08
VeresZorya
1Corners4
VeresZorya
45Dangerous attacks57
VeresZorya
-1Fouls-1
VeresZorya
3Cards3
VeresZorya

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.5Goals scored / match1.25
VeresZorya
0.75Goals conceded / match1.75
VeresZorya
37%Average possession59%
VeresZorya
2Shots on target / match4
VeresZorya

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.25Shots per match10.5
VeresZorya
2Shots on target4
VeresZorya
11.8%Shot conversion11.9%
VeresZorya
37%Possession59%
VeresZorya
0.79xG for1.63
VeresZorya
1.54xG against1.11
VeresZorya

Shooting quality

Veres: BalancedZorya: Balanced
VeresZorya
Accuracy (shots on target)47%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zorya is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Veres · 1.5 pts / match - Zorya

Veres
LLDW
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.79Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%
Zorya
WLWL
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zorya is 150% better for: goals scored per match.

0.5 goals / match - Veres · 1.25 goals / match - Zorya

Veres is 133% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - Veres · 1.75 goals / match - Zorya

Veres scoring profile: strong

Veres scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Zorya keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

Zorya scoring profile: strong

Zorya scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Veres keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

2Goals scored (season)5
VeresZorya
3Goals conceded (season)7
VeresZorya
1.25Average goals in match3
VeresZorya
2Goals scored (last 5)5
VeresZorya
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
VeresZorya

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal75%
VeresZorya
0%2 goals50%
VeresZorya
0%3 goals0%
VeresZorya
0%4 goals0%
VeresZorya

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal75%
VeresZorya
25%2 goals50%
VeresZorya
0%3 goals50%
VeresZorya
0%4 goals0%
VeresZorya

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
VeresZorya
0%BTTS in both halves0%
VeresZorya
0%Scored in both halves0%
VeresZorya

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
VeresZorya
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
VeresZorya
25%BTTS - last 550%
VeresZorya

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

25%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
VeresZorya
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
VeresZorya
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
VeresZorya

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
VeresZorya
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
VeresZorya
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
VeresZorya

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zorya is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / match - Veres · 1 pts / match - Zorya

Veres - half-time state
0% leading75% draw25% trailing
Zorya - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)1
VeresZorya
0Goals scored (1st half)0.25
VeresZorya
0.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
VeresZorya
0.25Average goals (1st half)0.75
VeresZorya
75%Clean sheet before half-time50%
VeresZorya
100%No goal before half-time75%
VeresZorya

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.5
VeresZorya
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1
VeresZorya
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1.25
VeresZorya
1Average goals (2nd half)2.25
VeresZorya
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
VeresZorya
50%No goal after half-time50%
VeresZorya

Veres - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
3
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zorya - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Veres - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.751.25
Goals scored / match0.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.30.5
Average goals in match0.31.0
1 goal25%75%
2 goals0%25%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet75%50%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 75% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Zorya - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.50
Goals scored / match0.31.0
Goals conceded / match0.51.3
Average goals in match0.82.3
1 goal75%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal75%50%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Veres
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Zorya
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
3
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-53%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Veres

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.75
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.79
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
38%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Zorya

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ukrainian Premier League).

Teams vs league

VeresLigaZorya
Average goals in match 1.252.31 3.00
Both teams scored 25%36% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%50% 75%
Clean sheets 50%43% 25%
Goal before half-time 25%56% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%72% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
36%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
43%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
0.97
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. VeresYellow cardIhor Kharatin
  2. VeresYellow cardSemen Vovchenko
  3. ZoryaYellow cardPylyp Budkivskyi
  4. VeresSubstitutionOn: Mykyta AleksandrovOff: Nathaniel Blair
  5. VeresSubstitutionOn: Danyil ChecherOff: David Niyo
  6. ZoryaYellow cardIgor Perduta
  7. ZoryaSubstitutionOn: Artem SlesarOff: Anton Hlushchenko
  8. ZoryaYellow cardBogdan Kushnirenko
  9. VeresYellow cardMaksym Smiyan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Veres 0 - 1 - 1 Zorya. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FC Zorya Luhansk
2 : 0
FC Veres Rivne
FC Veres Rivne
0 : 0
FC Zorya Luhansk

FAQ

What was the result of Veres vs Zorya?

The Ukrainian Premier League match finished Veres 1:1 Zorya. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Veres and Zorya?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Veres won 0, Zorya won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Veres vs Zorya?

Veres score 0.50 goals per game on average and Zorya 1.25. The Ukrainian Premier League average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Veres's matches and 50% of Zorya's.

What form are Veres and Zorya in?

Over the last 5 games Veres have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Zorya 2-0-2 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Veres vs Zorya?

The statistical background for Veres vs Zorya — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.