Viborg vs Nordsjælland: match statistics
Viborg vs Nordsjælland: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Viborg played Nordsjælland in Superliga (Denmark). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Viborg: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Nordsjælland: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Viborg scores 1.54 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Nordsjælland scores 1.64 and concedes 1.54. League average: 3.08 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Viborg 61%, Nordsjælland 54%. Over 2.5: Viborg 61%, Nordsjælland 64%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Nordsjælland has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.44. Viborg: 12.5 shots per match, Nordsjælland: 13.3.
Match halves
Viborg: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75. Nordsjælland: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.93.
Goals by minute
Viborg: 76-90+ (10 goals). Nordsjælland: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Superliga: 3.08 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The visitors are favored based on form: Nordsjælland have a 3-0-2 record in their last 5 matches, averaging 2.2 points per game, while Viborg have 1-1-3 and only 0.8 points. Offensively Nordsjælland scored 8 goals in the last 5 vs Viborg’s 5, and over the season the visitors have 46 goals to the hosts’ 43. At home Viborg average 1.79 goals with xG 1.30 and a 16% conversion rate, paired with a low share of goalless matches (7%), whereas Nordsjælland away average 1.31 goals with xG 1.34 and as many as 31% of matches without a goal. Statistically chances are similar (average shots 11.07 vs 11.23 and shots on target 4.07 vs 4.31), but the visitors have higher possession (53% vs 48%) and conceded fewer goals in the last 5 (4 vs 6), which favors them. Considering the visitors’ 2.2 points per game in the last 5, 8 goals scored and possession advantage, I tip a Nordsjælland win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
xG and goals-per-game analysis favors BTTS - Yes: Viborg scores 1.93 goals per game (xG 1.85) while Nordsjælland concedes 2.00 goals per game (xG against 1.67), creating scoring opportunities for the home side. Conversely, Nordsjælland scores 1.31 goals per game (xG 1.34) and Viborg concedes 1.13 goals per game (xG against 1.21), so the visitors have the statistical capacity to score as well. Recent 5-match trends reinforce this: BTTS was 60% for Viborg and 80% for Nordsjælland, with 5-game averages of 1.0 scored and 1.2 conceded for Viborg, and 1.6 scored and 0.8 conceded for Nordsjælland. Additionally, Viborg averages 6.67 shots on target with a 13% conversion rate, while Nordsjælland averages 4.31 SoT with a 12% conversion; Viborg also has a high xG against in the last 5 matches (1.75), increasing the likelihood of a goal for the visitors. Considering season BTTS rates of 53% (Viborg) and 54% (Nordsjælland), league BTTS level at 62%, and stronger recent form and xG indicators, I tip BTTS - Yes with a probability of 72% versus 28% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model based on xG and opponent defensive strength gives 1.76 xG for Viborg (averaging 1.85 and 1.67) and 1.28 xG for Nordsjælland (averaging 1.34 and 1.21), totaling 3.04 expected goals. Seasonally Viborg has 73% of matches Over 1.5 goals, and Nordsjælland 85%, while the league average for Over 2.5 is 61%, which supports a scenario of at least two goals. Both teams create many chances: Viborg averages 15.0 shots and 6.67 on target with 1.93 goals per game, Nordsjælland 11.23 shots, 4.31 on target and 1.31 goals, which raises the likelihood of goals. The percentage of matches Over 3.5 goals is lower (33% and 31%), so the probability of 4+ goals remains moderate. As a result the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (recommendation: Over 1.5) — I estimate its probability at 92%, Over 2.5 at 70% and Over 3.5 at 35%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Viborg has a clear advantage in the first half: they lead at the break in 47% of matches (7 times) and score an average of 0.8 goals by half-time while conceding only 0.27, whereas Nordsjælland lead at the break in 23% (3 times) and average 0.62 scored/1.0 conceded in the 1H. Over the whole season the home side win 60% of matches and have higher xG (1.85 vs 1.34) and more shots on target (6.67 vs 4.31), indicating greater ability to create chances. Although Nordsjælland are in better recent form over the last 5 matches (60% wins vs Viborg’s 20%), their average goals after the break is 0.69 versus the home side’s 1.13, so lower second-half effectiveness limits their chances of a turnaround. Additionally Viborg have a positive xG balance (+0.64) and concede very little by half-time (0.27), therefore the scenario of the hosts leading at the break and maintaining the win to full-time is the strongest. As a result I recommend HT/FT 1/1 as the best pick.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Viborg | Nordsjælland | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nordsjælland is 175% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Viborg · 2.2 pts / match - Nordsjælland
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nordsjælland is 6% better for: goals scored per match.
1.54 goals / match - Viborg · 1.64 goals / match - Nordsjælland
Viborg is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.46 goals / match - Viborg · 1.54 goals / match - Nordsjælland
Viborg scores in 86% of matches (24 of 28 matches), while Nordsjælland keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 matches).
Nordsjælland scores in 82% of matches (23 of 28 matches), while Viborg keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Viborg
Over / Under - Nordsjælland
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nordsjælland is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / match - Viborg · 1.39 pts / match - Nordsjælland
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Viborg - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Nordsjælland - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Viborg
Nordsjælland
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).
Teams vs league
| Viborg | Liga | Nordsjælland | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.00 | 3.08 | ▲ 3.18 |
| Both teams scored | • 61% | 61% | ▼ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 61% | 61% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 22% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 74% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 79% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Viborg 1 - 0 - 2 Nordsjælland. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Viborg vs Nordsjælland?
The Superliga match finished Viborg 1:0 Nordsjælland. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Viborg and Nordsjælland?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Viborg won 1, Nordsjælland won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Viborg vs Nordsjælland?
Viborg score 1.54 goals per game on average and Nordsjælland 1.64. The Superliga average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Viborg's matches and 54% of Nordsjælland's.
What form are Viborg and Nordsjælland in?
Over the last 5 games Viborg have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Nordsjælland 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Viborg vs Nordsjælland?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


