Hungary - NB IIPuskás Akadémia Pancho ArénaData current as of 20 September 2026

Videoton vs Szeged 2011: match statistics

Videoton crest
Videoton
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Szeged 2011 crest
Szeged 2011

Videoton vs Szeged 2011: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Videoton played Szeged 2011 in NB II (Hungary). The match was played on 8 August 2026. Venue: Puskás Akadémia Pancho Aréna. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Videoton: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match. Szeged 2011: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Videoton scores 2.50 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Szeged 2011 scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Videoton 50%, Szeged 2011 100%. Over 2.5: Videoton 100%, Szeged 2011 0%. League level: BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 64%.

xG, shots and style

Videoton has higher xG: 2.03 vs 0.00. Videoton: 15.5 shots per match, Szeged 2011: -1.0.

Match halves

Videoton: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.50. Szeged 2011: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Videoton: 46-60 (2 goals). Szeged 2011: 46-60 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB II: 2.86 goals per match, BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 64%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Videoton have clear home-field arguments in their favor: they won their only home match so far 4-0, averaging 22 shots, including 12 on target. The hosts create chances worth an average of 2.74 xG at home and have yet to concede, while Szeged 2011 drew their only away match 1-1. Videoton’s overall recent form is uneven, however, as they have lost 4 of their previous 5 matches and conceded 9 goals during that period. Szeged have scored just 4 goals in their last five appearances, with an away record averaging 1 goal scored and 1 conceded per match. The hosts’ clear superiority in chance creation and their very strong home performance so far point towards a Videoton win, although their weaker recent trend increases the risk of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for at least one team failing to score is primarily based on Szeged’s form: BTTS occurred in only 20% of their last 5 matches, while the team averaged 0.8 goals scored. Szeged also conceded just 0.8 goals per match, whereas Videoton averaged 1.4 goals scored, which does not give the hosts a clear advantage in a high-scoring game. Videoton has a weak defensive record, averaging 1.8 goals conceded and 1.63 xG against in their last five appearances, but their three most recent results were defeats, with BTTS recorded in 60% of those matches. The league-wide BTTS average of 69% supports a Goal/Goal scenario, but the visitors’ limited attacking output and solid recent defensive record provide stronger support for BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team is expected not to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Videoton have averaged 1.4 goals scored and 1.8 conceded over their last five matches, resulting in a high 80% of games featuring at least three goals. Szeged 2011, however, present a much more defensive profile: they average 0.8 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, while only 20% of their last five matches went over 2.5 goals. The quality of chances also points to moderate overall scoring potential, with Szeged averaging 1.31 xG and just 0.96 xG conceded, while Videoton both create and allow 1.63 xG. The projected total of 2.30 goals is below the league average of 2.77, making Under 3.5 goals the strongest signal; this line provides a buffer even for a 2:1 result.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest HT/FT option is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as Szeged were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches and finished the full match level in 40% of cases. During this period, the visitors conceded just 0.2 goals before half-time and 0.8 goals across the entire match, which points to a balanced and cautious contest. Videoton more often started matches aggressively, leading at the break in 40% of their last five appearances, but went on to lose as many as 80% of those games and conceded an average of 1.2 goals after half-time. The hosts scored an average of 1.4 goals per match, but their defence allowed opponents to score 1.8, while Szeged recorded averages of 0.8 goals scored and 0.8 conceded. Seasonal data is very limited, so greater weight should be placed on the current run, which indicates a slight advantage for the visitors in the second half, although a draw remains the single most likely final outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
VideotonSzeged 2011
4Shots6
VideotonSzeged 2011
2Shots on target3
VideotonSzeged 2011
0.65xG1.01
VideotonSzeged 2011
0Corners7
VideotonSzeged 2011
34Dangerous attacks58
VideotonSzeged 2011
19Fouls13
VideotonSzeged 2011
9Cards5
VideotonSzeged 2011

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.5Goals scored / match1
VideotonSzeged 2011
1.5Goals conceded / match1
VideotonSzeged 2011
44%Average possession-1%
VideotonSzeged 2011
8.5Shots on target / match-1
VideotonSzeged 2011

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.5Shots per match-1
VideotonSzeged 2011
8.5Shots on target-1
VideotonSzeged 2011
16.1%Shot conversion-100%
VideotonSzeged 2011
44%Possession-1%
VideotonSzeged 2011
2.03xG for0
VideotonSzeged 2011
1.25xG against0
VideotonSzeged 2011

Shooting quality

Videoton: Counter-attackingSzeged 2011: Balanced
VideotonSzeged 2011
Accuracy (shots on target)55%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Videoton is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.5 pts / match - Videoton · 1 pts / match - Szeged 2011

Videoton
WL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 2.03Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 100%
Szeged 2011
D
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Videoton is 150% better for: goals scored per match.

2.5 goals / match - Videoton · 1 goals / match - Szeged 2011

Szeged 2011 is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Videoton · 1 goals / match - Szeged 2011

Videoton scoring profile: very strong

Videoton scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Szeged 2011 keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

Szeged 2011 scoring profile: very strong

Szeged 2011 scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

5Goals scored (season)1
VideotonSzeged 2011
3Goals conceded (season)1
VideotonSzeged 2011
4Average goals in match2
VideotonSzeged 2011
5Goals scored (last 5)1
VideotonSzeged 2011
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
VideotonSzeged 2011

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
VideotonSzeged 2011
50%2 goals0%
VideotonSzeged 2011
50%3 goals0%
VideotonSzeged 2011
50%4 goals0%
VideotonSzeged 2011

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
VideotonSzeged 2011
50%2 goals0%
VideotonSzeged 2011
50%3 goals0%
VideotonSzeged 2011
0%4 goals0%
VideotonSzeged 2011

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

71%
League average

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
VideotonSzeged 2011
0%BTTS in both halves0%
VideotonSzeged 2011
50%Scored in both halves0%
VideotonSzeged 2011

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
VideotonSzeged 2011
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
VideotonSzeged 2011
50%BTTS - last 5100%
VideotonSzeged 2011

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
VideotonSzeged 2011
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
VideotonSzeged 2011
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
VideotonSzeged 2011

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
VideotonSzeged 2011
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
VideotonSzeged 2011
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
VideotonSzeged 2011

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Videoton - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Szeged 2011 - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)0
VideotonSzeged 2011
1Goals scored (1st half)0
VideotonSzeged 2011
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1
VideotonSzeged 2011
1.5Average goals (1st half)1
VideotonSzeged 2011
50%Clean sheet before half-time0%
VideotonSzeged 2011
0%No goal before half-time100%
VideotonSzeged 2011

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)3
VideotonSzeged 2011
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)1
VideotonSzeged 2011
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0
VideotonSzeged 2011
2.5Average goals (2nd half)1
VideotonSzeged 2011
50%Clean sheet after half-time100%
VideotonSzeged 2011
50%No goal after half-time0%
VideotonSzeged 2011

Videoton - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Szeged 2011 - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Videoton - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.50
Goals scored / match1.01.5
Goals conceded / match0.51.0
Average goals in match1.52.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%100%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 2
Szeged 2011 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.003.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Videoton
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Szeged 2011
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Videoton

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.78
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Szeged 2011

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).

Teams vs league

VideotonLigaSzeged 2011
Average goals in match 4.002.86 2.00
Both teams scored 50%71% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%64% 0%
Clean sheets 50%21% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%79% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%71% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.86
Average goals per match
71%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+67%
Home attack advantage
+40%
Home defence advantage
+29%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Videoton 2 - 0 - 0 Szeged 2011. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Szeged 2011 FC
0 : 3
Videoton FC Fehérvár
Videoton FC Fehérvár
1 : 0
Szeged 2011 FC

FAQ

What was the result of Videoton vs Szeged 2011?

The NB II match finished Videoton 1:0 Szeged 2011. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Videoton and Szeged 2011?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Videoton won 2, Szeged 2011 won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Videoton vs Szeged 2011?

Videoton score 2.50 goals per game on average and Szeged 2011 1.00. The NB II average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Videoton's matches and 100% of Szeged 2011's.

What form are Videoton and Szeged 2011 in?

Over the last 5 games Videoton have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Szeged 2011 0-1-0 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Videoton vs Szeged 2011?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.