Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 03 November 2026

VPS vs KuPS: match statistics

VPS crest
VPS
0 : 2half-time 0:2
KuPS crest
KuPS

VPS vs KuPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

VPS played KuPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

VPS: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. KuPS: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

VPS scores 1.25 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. KuPS scores 1.63 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: VPS 50%, KuPS 63%. Over 2.5: VPS 38%, KuPS 42%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

KuPS has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.44. VPS: 11.8 shots per match, KuPS: 15.5.

Match halves

VPS: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.54. KuPS: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

VPS: 0-15 (7 goals). KuPS: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KuPS lead the table and create more chances away from home, averaging 15.58 shots, 5.5 shots on target and 1.79 xG, compared with VPS’s 12.25 shots, 4.58 shots on target and 1.44 xG at home. However, the hosts are very solid defensively on their own turf, conceding just 0.92 goals per match, while KuPS average 1.50 goals scored away from home. Both teams have an identical 50% win rate in their respective home and away fixtures, although the visitors draw as many as 33% of their matches on the road. Current form does not clearly favour the league leaders: KuPS have scored 4 goals in their last five matches, while VPS have scored 3, with the two sides recording just 1 and 2 wins respectively during that period. KuPS hold a slight edge in chance quality, but VPS’s home advantage and the evenly matched form point towards a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Over the long term, the data supported goals from both sides, with VPS recording BTTS in 67% of matches and KuPS in 58%, averaging 1.75 and 1.50 goals scored respectively. However, current form clearly weakens this signal: VPS has scored just 3 goals in its last 5 matches, while KuPS has scored 4, with BTTS occurring in only 20% and 40% of those games respectively. The hosts have recently averaged 0.6 goals per match, compared with 0.8 for the visitors, increasing the risk that at least one team will fail to score. KuPS has conceded just 0.83 goals per game this season and kept a clean sheet in 25% of matches, while VPS has failed to score in 17% of its fixtures. Although both teams’ xG over the last five rounds stands at 1.20 and 1.55, poor finishing and the low recent BTTS rate marginally support the “No” option.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest form of both teams clearly lowers goal expectations: VPS have scored only 3 goals in their last 5 matches, while KuPS have scored 4, averaging 0.6 and 0.8 per game, respectively. Over the same period, VPS conceded an average of 1.0 goal, while KuPS conceded 1.2, pointing to a scoreline around 1:1 rather than an open, end-to-end contest. In addition, only 20% of each team’s last five matches ended with at least three goals. Creative potential remains moderate, as VPS’s xG over their last five matches stands at 1.20 compared with 1.31 allowed by KuPS, while KuPS have generated 1.55 xG against 1.48 allowed by VPS. Furthermore, over the entire season, matches involving the two teams have ended with a maximum of three goals in 67% of VPS games and 83% of KuPS games, making Under 3.5 the market best supported by the data.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

VPS hold a slight home advantage: they average 1.75 goals across the season, while KuPS concede only 0.83 away from home, suggesting a tight match likely to be decided by a narrow margin. The hosts led at the break in 50% of their matches, whereas KuPS were behind at half-time in 25%, strengthening the scenario of VPS taking the lead before the interval. VPS also create slightly fewer quality chances than KuPS (xG of 1.77 versus 1.79), but their average of 5.25 shots on target is very close to the visitors’ 5.50 and does not indicate a clear away advantage. The last five matches have nevertheless been low-scoring, with VPS averaging 0.6 goals and KuPS 0.8, which reduces the likelihood of the visitors completing a turnaround. The 1/1 pick is the strongest, although the high draw rates in the second halves—42% for VPS and 50% for KuPS—maintain a relatively high probability of draw-related outcomes.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
VPSKuPS
17Shots7
VPSKuPS
1Shots on target4
VPSKuPS
1.48xG0.83
VPSKuPS
10Corners4
VPSKuPS
47Dangerous attacks14
VPSKuPS
17Fouls8
VPSKuPS
5Cards1
VPSKuPS

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.25Goals scored / match1.63
VPSKuPS
0.96Goals conceded / match1
VPSKuPS
47%Average possession57%
VPSKuPS
4.58Shots on target / match5.38
VPSKuPS

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.83Shots per match15.46
VPSKuPS
4.58Shots on target5.38
VPSKuPS
10.6%Shot conversion10.5%
VPSKuPS
47%Possession57%
VPSKuPS
1.44xG for1.78
VPSKuPS
1.36xG against1.25
VPSKuPS

Shooting quality

VPS: BalancedKuPS: Dominant
VPSKuPS
Accuracy (shots on target)39%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

VPS is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - VPS · 1 pts / match - KuPS

VPS
LWLWL
Season result split
42% W25% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-8
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
KuPS
WLLDD
Season result split
50% W38% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-3
1.88 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KuPS is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - VPS · 1.63 goals / match - KuPS

VPS scoring profile: strong

VPS scores in 71% of matches (17 of 24 matches), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).

KuPS scoring profile: very strong

KuPS scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while VPS keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).

30Goals scored (season)39
VPSKuPS
23Goals conceded (season)24
VPSKuPS
2.21Average goals in match2.63
VPSKuPS
3Goals scored (last 5)5
VPSKuPS
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
VPSKuPS

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal83%
VPSKuPS
25%2 goals46%
VPSKuPS
17%3 goals25%
VPSKuPS
8%4 goals8%
VPSKuPS

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal71%
VPSKuPS
17%2 goals17%
VPSKuPS
8%3 goals8%
VPSKuPS
0%4 goals4%
VPSKuPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time25%
VPSKuPS
0%BTTS in both halves8%
VPSKuPS
13%Scored in both halves25%
VPSKuPS

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
VPSKuPS
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
VPSKuPS
20%BTTS - last 560%
VPSKuPS

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
VPSKuPS
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
VPSKuPS
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
VPSKuPS

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
VPSKuPS
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
VPSKuPS
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
VPSKuPS

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KuPS is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.46 pts / match - VPS · 1.92 pts / match - KuPS

VPS - half-time state
38% leading33% draw29% trailing
KuPS - half-time state
54% leading29% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.46Points per match (1st half)1.92
VPSKuPS
0.71Goals scored (1st half)1.04
VPSKuPS
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
VPSKuPS
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.5
VPSKuPS
54%Clean sheet before half-time63%
VPSKuPS
54%No goal before half-time33%
VPSKuPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.21
VPSKuPS
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
VPSKuPS
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.54
VPSKuPS
0.92Average goals (2nd half)1.13
VPSKuPS
67%Clean sheet after half-time50%
VPSKuPS
63%No goal after half-time58%
VPSKuPS

VPS - second-half results

29% W46% D25% L
35
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.46
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KuPS - second-half results

25% W46% D29% L
46
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding93%

Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 50%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

VPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
KuPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.60.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

VPS
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
3
5
16-30
7
6
31-45
3
1
46-60
6
6
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

KuPS
ScoredConceded
8
6
0-15
6
1
16-30
11
4
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
5
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

VPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

KuPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.88
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

VPSLigaKuPS
Average goals in match▼ 2.212.51▲ 2.63
Both teams scored• 50%50%▲ 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 38%45%▼ 42%
Clean sheets• 29%29%• 29%
Goal before half-time▲ 75%73%▲ 79%
Goal after half-time▼ 63%74%▼ 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KuPSGoalTommi Jyry
  2. VPSYellow cardMiika Niemi
  3. KuPSYellow cardAyman Aiki
  4. VPSYellow cardOluwaseyi Ogunniyi
  5. KuPSSubstitutionOn: Taneli HämäläinenOff: Brahima Magassa
  6. VPSYellow cardLassana Mané
  7. KuPSSubstitutionOn: Samuel PasanenOff: Tommi Jyry

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): VPS 1 - 2 - 1 KuPS. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.

KuPS
3 : 1
VPS
VPS
1 : 1
KuPS
Vaasan Palloseura
1 : 1
Kuopion Palloseura
Kuopion Palloseura
0 : 2
Vaasan Palloseura

FAQ

What was the result of VPS vs KuPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished VPS 0:2 KuPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between VPS and KuPS?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches VPS won 1, KuPS won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before VPS vs KuPS?

VPS score 1.25 goals per game on average and KuPS 1.63. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 50% of VPS's matches and 63% of KuPS's.

What form are VPS and KuPS in?

Over the last 5 games VPS have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and KuPS 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for VPS vs KuPS?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for VPS vs KuPS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.