VPS vs TPS: match statistics
VPS vs TPS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
VPS played TPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 14 August 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
VPS: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. TPS: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
VPS scores 1.42 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. TPS scores 1.26 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: VPS 58%, TPS 53%. Over 2.5: VPS 42%, TPS 47%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
VPS has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.46. VPS: 12.3 shots per match, TPS: 11.9.
Match halves
VPS: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.63. TPS: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
VPS: 31-45+ (7 goals). TPS: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Veikkausliiga: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
VPS have a clear home advantage: they have won 56% of their home matches, scoring an average of 1.89 goals and conceding just 0.78 per game. TPS are still without an away win, losing 56% of their matches, scoring only 0.67 goals per game, and failing to find the net in as many as 44% of their away fixtures. The hosts create more high-quality chances, recording a home xG of 1.57 and 5.22 shots on target per match, while TPS average just 3.89 shots on target away from home. Although VPS’s form over their last five matches has been inconsistent and TPS have conceded only 5 goals during that period, the hosts’ more reliable defence and the visitors’ very poor away finishing strongly support a VPS win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS pick is slightly supported by current form: VPS and TPS have averaged 1.2 and 1.6 goals respectively over their last five matches. During this period, VPS conceded 1.4 goals per game and TPS 1.0, while their average xG against figures stand at 1.41 and 1.68, suggesting opportunities for both sides. The seasonal rate of matches in which both teams scored is 50% for VPS and 56% for TPS, while over their last five appearances it was 60% and 40% respectively. The hosts are clearly stronger offensively, scoring 1.8 goals per game this season, whereas TPS's weaker finishing—just 0.67 goals on average and 44% of matches without scoring—limits confidence in the pick. Despite this caveat, TPS's xG of 1.53 and the visitors' low clean-sheet rate of just 11% point to a slight preference for the scenario in which both teams find the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
VPS averages 1.8 goals at home, while TPS concedes 1.33 goals per away match, clearly supporting at least one goal for the home side. In their last five matches, both teams recorded games with Over 2.5 goals in 60% of cases, while their average xG stood at 1.57 and 1.48, respectively. During this period, TPS scored an average of 1.6 goals, although its season-long away scoring rate is lower, at just 0.67 goals per match. The Over 1.5 goals line has an edge, as VPS scored at least two goals in 80% of its matches this season, while the combination of current attacking data points to a forecast of 2.65 goals. At the same time, only 20% of VPS matches and 22% of TPS matches went Over 3.5 goals, so a high-scoring game is not the baseline scenario.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
VPS have won 70% of their matches and average 2.2 points per game, while TPS have failed to win any away match, averaging just 0.44 points. The hosts led at the break in 4 of 10 matches, whereas TPS have never been ahead at half-time and were trailing after the first half in 56% of their games. VPS’s advantage is also evident in their finishing: they score an average of 1.80 goals with a 16% shot-conversion rate, while TPS score only 0.67 goals per match and convert 5% of their attempts. However, the visitors’ recent form has improved, as they have averaged 1.6 goals across their last five matches, so a turnaround or an upset cannot be completely ruled out. The strongest signal still points to VPS leading at the break and holding on to win at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| VPS | TPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
TPS is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - VPS · 1.4 pts / match - TPS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
VPS is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
1.42 goals / match - VPS · 1.26 goals / match - TPS
VPS is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.95 goals / match - VPS · 1.11 goals / match - TPS
VPS scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).
TPS scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while VPS keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - VPS
Over / Under - TPS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
VPS is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - VPS · 1 pts / match - TPS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
VPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
TPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
VPS
TPS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| VPS | Liga | TPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.37 | 2.58 | ▼ 2.37 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 49% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 46% | • 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 26% | 29% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 74% | 76% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 75% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: VPS 0 - 0 - 1 TPS. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of VPS vs TPS?
The Veikkausliiga match finished VPS 1:3 TPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before VPS vs TPS?
VPS score 1.42 goals per game on average and TPS 1.26. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 58% of VPS's matches and 53% of TPS's.
What form are VPS and TPS in?
Over the last 5 games VPS have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and TPS 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for VPS vs TPS?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for VPS vs TPS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


