Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 15 October 2026

VPS vs TPS: match statistics

VPS crest
VPS
1 : 3half-time 0:2
TPS crest
TPS

VPS vs TPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

VPS played TPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 14 August 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

VPS: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. TPS: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

VPS scores 1.42 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. TPS scores 1.26 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: VPS 58%, TPS 53%. Over 2.5: VPS 42%, TPS 47%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

VPS has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.46. VPS: 12.3 shots per match, TPS: 11.9.

Match halves

VPS: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.63. TPS: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

VPS: 31-45+ (7 goals). TPS: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

VPS have a clear home advantage: they have won 56% of their home matches, scoring an average of 1.89 goals and conceding just 0.78 per game. TPS are still without an away win, losing 56% of their matches, scoring only 0.67 goals per game, and failing to find the net in as many as 44% of their away fixtures. The hosts create more high-quality chances, recording a home xG of 1.57 and 5.22 shots on target per match, while TPS average just 3.89 shots on target away from home. Although VPS’s form over their last five matches has been inconsistent and TPS have conceded only 5 goals during that period, the hosts’ more reliable defence and the visitors’ very poor away finishing strongly support a VPS win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS pick is slightly supported by current form: VPS and TPS have averaged 1.2 and 1.6 goals respectively over their last five matches. During this period, VPS conceded 1.4 goals per game and TPS 1.0, while their average xG against figures stand at 1.41 and 1.68, suggesting opportunities for both sides. The seasonal rate of matches in which both teams scored is 50% for VPS and 56% for TPS, while over their last five appearances it was 60% and 40% respectively. The hosts are clearly stronger offensively, scoring 1.8 goals per game this season, whereas TPS's weaker finishing—just 0.67 goals on average and 44% of matches without scoring—limits confidence in the pick. Despite this caveat, TPS's xG of 1.53 and the visitors' low clean-sheet rate of just 11% point to a slight preference for the scenario in which both teams find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

VPS averages 1.8 goals at home, while TPS concedes 1.33 goals per away match, clearly supporting at least one goal for the home side. In their last five matches, both teams recorded games with Over 2.5 goals in 60% of cases, while their average xG stood at 1.57 and 1.48, respectively. During this period, TPS scored an average of 1.6 goals, although its season-long away scoring rate is lower, at just 0.67 goals per match. The Over 1.5 goals line has an edge, as VPS scored at least two goals in 80% of its matches this season, while the combination of current attacking data points to a forecast of 2.65 goals. At the same time, only 20% of VPS matches and 22% of TPS matches went Over 3.5 goals, so a high-scoring game is not the baseline scenario.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

VPS have won 70% of their matches and average 2.2 points per game, while TPS have failed to win any away match, averaging just 0.44 points. The hosts led at the break in 4 of 10 matches, whereas TPS have never been ahead at half-time and were trailing after the first half in 56% of their games. VPS’s advantage is also evident in their finishing: they score an average of 1.80 goals with a 16% shot-conversion rate, while TPS score only 0.67 goals per match and convert 5% of their attempts. However, the visitors’ recent form has improved, as they have averaged 1.6 goals across their last five matches, so a turnaround or an upset cannot be completely ruled out. The strongest signal still points to VPS leading at the break and holding on to win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
VPSTPS
14Shots11
VPSTPS
4Shots on target4
VPSTPS
1.56xG1.3
VPSTPS
7Corners4
VPSTPS
55Dangerous attacks44
VPSTPS
14Fouls12
VPSTPS
4Cards2
VPSTPS

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.42Goals scored / match1.26
VPSTPS
0.95Goals conceded / match1.11
VPSTPS
48%Average possession47%
VPSTPS
4.95Shots on target / match4.37
VPSTPS

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.26Shots per match11.89
VPSTPS
4.95Shots on target4.37
VPSTPS
11.6%Shot conversion10.6%
VPSTPS
48%Possession47%
VPSTPS
1.5xG for1.46
VPSTPS
1.33xG against1.6
VPSTPS

Shooting quality

VPS: BalancedTPS: Balanced
VPSTPS
Accuracy (shots on target)40%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

TPS is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - VPS · 1.4 pts / match - TPS

VPS
WLLLW
Season result split
42% W32% D26% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-5
1.58 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
TPS
WLLWD
Season result split
37% W26% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-7
1.37 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-5
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

VPS is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.42 goals / match - VPS · 1.26 goals / match - TPS

VPS is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.95 goals / match - VPS · 1.11 goals / match - TPS

VPS scoring profile: strong

VPS scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while VPS keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).

27Goals scored (season)24
VPSTPS
18Goals conceded (season)21
VPSTPS
2.37Average goals in match2.37
VPSTPS
6Goals scored (last 5)8
VPSTPS
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
VPSTPS

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal79%
VPSTPS
32%2 goals32%
VPSTPS
21%3 goals16%
VPSTPS
11%4 goals0%
VPSTPS

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal68%
VPSTPS
16%2 goals32%
VPSTPS
5%3 goals11%
VPSTPS
0%4 goals0%
VPSTPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
VPSTPS
0%BTTS in both halves5%
VPSTPS
16%Scored in both halves26%
VPSTPS

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
VPSTPS
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
VPSTPS
60%BTTS - last 540%
VPSTPS

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
VPSTPS
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
VPSTPS
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
VPSTPS

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
VPSTPS
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
VPSTPS
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
VPSTPS

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

VPS is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - VPS · 1 pts / match - TPS

VPS - half-time state
37% leading37% draw26% trailing
TPS - half-time state
21% leading37% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1
VPSTPS
0.79Goals scored (1st half)0.58
VPSTPS
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
VPSTPS
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.21
VPSTPS
53%Clean sheet before half-time53%
VPSTPS
53%No goal before half-time58%
VPSTPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per match (2nd half)1.53
VPSTPS
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
VPSTPS
0.37Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
VPSTPS
1Average goals (2nd half)1.16
VPSTPS
68%Clean sheet after half-time58%
VPSTPS
58%No goal after half-time37%
VPSTPS

VPS - second-half results

37% W37% D26% L
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

TPS - second-half results

37% W42% D21% L
19
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

VPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.20.2
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
TPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match2.00.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

VPS
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
7
4
31-45
3
1
46-60
6
5
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

TPS
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
4
5
16-30
5
7
31-45
6
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.37
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-58%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

VPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

VPSLigaTPS
Average goals in match▼ 2.372.58▼ 2.37
Both teams scored▲ 58%49%▲ 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 42%46%• 47%
Clean sheets▼ 26%29%▲ 32%
Goal before half-time▼ 74%76%▼ 68%
Goal after half-time▼ 68%75%▲ 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. VPSSubstitutionOn: Henri SalomaaOff: Jonathan Muzinga
  2. VPSYellow cardOluwaseyi Ogunniyi
  3. TPSYellow cardPau Juvanteny Costa
  4. TPSSubstitutionOn: Miika KauppilaOff: Nikolas Talo
  5. VPSYellow cardXavier Odhiambo
  6. VPSSubstitutionOn: Yassin DaoussiOff: Simon Lindholm

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: VPS 0 - 0 - 1 TPS. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of VPS vs TPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished VPS 1:3 TPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before VPS vs TPS?

VPS score 1.42 goals per game on average and TPS 1.26. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 58% of VPS's matches and 53% of TPS's.

What form are VPS and TPS in?

Over the last 5 games VPS have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and TPS 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for VPS vs TPS?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for VPS vs TPS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.