Wealdstone vs Gateshead: match statistics
Wealdstone vs Gateshead: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wealdstone played Gateshead in National League (England). The match was played on 26 September 2026. Venue: Grosvenor Vale. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Wealdstone: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Gateshead: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wealdstone scores 1.22 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Gateshead scores 0.67 and concedes 2.22. League average: 3.01 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wealdstone 67%, Gateshead 44%. Over 2.5: Wealdstone 56%, Gateshead 56%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Wealdstone has higher xG: 1.27 vs 1.05. Wealdstone: 8.9 shots per match, Gateshead: 6.6.
Match halves
Wealdstone: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.67. Gateshead: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Wealdstone: 61-75 (3 goals). Gateshead: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
National League: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wealdstone have a poor home record, but Gateshead have been even worse away from home: they have lost every match played on the road so far and score just 0.4 goals per game away from home. The hosts create significantly more chances, averaging 10.75 shots and an xG of 1.47, while the visitors manage 5.2 shots and have an xG of just 0.89. Gateshead have failed to win any of their last five matches, losing four of them and conceding as many as 14 goals during that period. Wealdstone also have defensive issues, conceding 2.25 goals per home game and failing to keep a clean sheet, but their last five matches have produced 2 wins and 7 goals scored. The hosts’ superiority in chance creation, combined with Gateshead’s very poor away form, points to a Wealdstone win, although the risk of conceding remains significant.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The scenario in which at least one team fails to score is slightly more likely, primarily due to Gateshead’s poor away attacking record: the team scores an average of just 0.4 goals, produces an xG of 0.89, and fails to score in 60% of its matches. Wealdstone are not particularly impressive either, but they average 1.0 goal at home, register 3.5 shots on target per match, and will face a Gateshead defence conceding an average of 2.4 goals with no clean sheets. The last five matches provide some support for BTTS - Yes, as both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of those fixtures; however, Gateshead scored only 0.6 goals per match during this period. The hosts concede an average of 2.0 goals, but the visitors’ low creative output and frequent scoreless games prevent BTTS - Yes from being considered the stronger option. Therefore, BTTS - No is the preferred selection, meaning that at least one team is expected not to score; it does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Wealdstone should create more chances, as its average xG is 1.24, while Gateshead allows opponents an average of 1.76 xG and concedes 2.4 goals per match. The visitors’ defense has looked particularly vulnerable in their last five matches, conceding 14 goals, or 2.8 per game. Gateshead averages just 0.4 goals per match this season and 0.6 across its last five games, but Wealdstone concedes 2.0 goals per match, so a goal from the visitors remains a realistic scenario. At least two goals were scored in 75% of Wealdstone’s matches and 80% of Gateshead’s, while the league-wide average is a high 3.01 goals. The strongest signal points to Over 1.5, as the visitors’ weak defense clearly increases the chances of at least two goals, with less risk than on the 2.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Wealdstone win after the match, as the hosts were level at the break in 3 of their 4 games, while Gateshead were trailing at half-time in 4 of their last 5 matches. In their last five appearances, Wealdstone were leading at the break in 40% of games and did not lose any of them, whereas the visitors failed to record a lead and went into half-time behind in 60% of cases. The hosts have higher average xG, 1.24 compared with 0.89, and also average 3.5 shots on target per match versus Gateshead’s 2.6. After the break, Wealdstone score an average of 1.0 goal, while Gateshead concede as many as 1.6, which strongly supports the match being decided in the second half. Additionally, the visitors have lost all of their league matches so far and concede an average of 2.4 goals, making it less likely that the draw will hold until full-time than that the hosts will complete a later turnaround and win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wealdstone | Gateshead | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wealdstone is 500% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Wealdstone · 0.2 pts / match - Gateshead
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wealdstone is 82% better for: goals scored per match.
1.22 goals / match - Wealdstone · 0.67 goals / match - Gateshead
Wealdstone is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Wealdstone · 2.22 goals / match - Gateshead
Wealdstone scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Gateshead keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).
Gateshead scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while Wealdstone keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wealdstone
Over / Under - Gateshead
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wealdstone is 177% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / match - Wealdstone · 0.44 pts / match - Gateshead
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wealdstone - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gateshead - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -8 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wealdstone
Gateshead
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).
Teams vs league
| Wealdstone | Liga | Gateshead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.89 | 3.01 | ▼ 2.89 |
| Both teams scored | • 67% | 66% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 56% | 60% | ▼ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 18% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 71% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 87% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Wealdstone 0 - 1 - 1 Gateshead. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Wealdstone vs Gateshead?
The National League match finished Wealdstone 4:0 Gateshead. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Wealdstone and Gateshead?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Wealdstone won 0, Gateshead won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Wealdstone vs Gateshead?
Wealdstone score 1.22 goals per game on average and Gateshead 0.67. The National League average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Wealdstone's matches and 44% of Gateshead's.
What form are Wealdstone and Gateshead in?
Over the last 5 games Wealdstone have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Gateshead 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wealdstone vs Gateshead?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Wealdstone vs Gateshead: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


