Wealdstone vs Hartlepool United: match statistics
Wealdstone vs Hartlepool United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wealdstone played Hartlepool United in National League (England). The match was played on 31 March 2026. Final score: 7:0.
Current form
Wealdstone: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Hartlepool United: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wealdstone scores 1.36 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Hartlepool United scores 1.21 and concedes 1.08. League average: 2.94 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wealdstone 56%, Hartlepool United 44%. Over 2.5: Wealdstone 54%, Hartlepool United 36%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Wealdstone has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.54. Wealdstone: 12.4 shots per match, Hartlepool United: 12.1.
Match halves
Wealdstone: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.85. Hartlepool United: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.74.
Goals by minute
Wealdstone: 61-75 (14 goals). Hartlepool United: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
National League: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Hartlepool United sit higher (9th) and show better last-five form (llwww, 1.8 PPG) than Wealdstone (14th, wlllw, 1.2 PPG). Wealdstone have stronger home offensive stats (1.58 G/90, higher possession 59% and xG 1.65) but concede more on average (1.53) than Hartlepool away (1.21). Hartlepool feature a higher away CS% (42%) and a more stable defence, offsetting a lower shots average. Considering form, the visitors’ defensive solidity and the hosts’ variance in chance creation, I predict a narrow Hartlepool victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Although average xG for both teams (~1.5) and league BTTS 57% suggest scoring potential, individual team stats point to a lower likelihood of both teams scoring. Season BTTS for Wealdstone 45% and Hartlepool 42% are below league average, and last5 BTTS for both is only 20%, which argues strongly against BTTS. Relatively high clean sheet rates (35% and 42%) indicate frequent matches with at least one team keeping a clean sheet. xG_against shows Hartlepool concedes clearer chances more often, but overall result trends and low recent BTTS frequency favor a ‘No’ selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG indicates a relatively balanced but clearly goal-prone matchup (xG_home 1.58 vs xG_away 1.50; xG_conceded 1.55 and 1.79), totaling ~3.05 expected xG. Season Over 0.5 and Over 1.5 rates for both teams (notably 75% home >1.5) and BTTS frequencies (~45%/42%) support at least two goals. Wealdstone’s high goals conceded this season (65) raises the opponent scoring probability, and Hartlepool has stronger recent attacking form. Shot and xG metrics suggest more chances than pure goals averages imply, so Over 1.5 is the strongest signal. Given moderate uncertainty on Over 2.5 (seasonal ~35–37%), remain cautious on 2.5 and 3.5 lines.
View Over/Under statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wealdstone | Hartlepool United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Hartlepool United is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Wealdstone · 1.8 pts / match - Hartlepool United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wealdstone is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
1.36 goals / match - Wealdstone · 1.21 goals / match - Hartlepool United
Hartlepool United is 55% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Wealdstone · 1.08 goals / match - Hartlepool United
Wealdstone scores in 69% of matches (27 of 39 matches), while Hartlepool United keeps a clean sheet in 38% (15 of 39 matches).
Hartlepool United scores in 69% of matches (27 of 39 matches), while Wealdstone keeps a clean sheet in 15% (6 of 39 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wealdstone
Over / Under - Hartlepool United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hartlepool United is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.85 pts / match - Wealdstone · 1.26 pts / match - Hartlepool United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wealdstone - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Hartlepool United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wealdstone
Hartlepool United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).
Teams vs league
| Wealdstone | Liga | Hartlepool United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.03 | 2.94 | ▼ 2.28 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 56% | 58% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 54% | 57% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 23% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 72% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 81% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Wealdstone 0 - 1 - 0 Hartlepool United. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Wealdstone vs Hartlepool United?
The National League match finished Wealdstone 7:0 Hartlepool United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wealdstone vs Hartlepool United?
Wealdstone score 1.36 goals per game on average and Hartlepool United 1.21. The National League average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Wealdstone's matches and 44% of Hartlepool United's.
What form are Wealdstone and Hartlepool United in?
Over the last 5 games Wealdstone have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Hartlepool United 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wealdstone vs Hartlepool United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.