Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueWolaita Soddo StadiumData current as of 24 July 2026

Welayta Dicha vs Mebrat Hayl: match statistics

Welayta Dicha crest
Welayta Dicha
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Mebrat Hayl crest
Mebrat Hayl

Welayta Dicha vs Mebrat Hayl: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Welayta Dicha play Mebrat Hayl in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 22 June 2026 at 14:00. Venue: Wolaita Soddo Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Welayta Dicha: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Mebrat Hayl: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Welayta Dicha scores 0.97 and concedes 0.82 goals per match. Mebrat Hayl scores 0.84 and concedes 0.68. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Welayta Dicha 45%, Mebrat Hayl 37%. Over 2.5: Welayta Dicha 26%, Mebrat Hayl 26%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Welayta Dicha has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.12. Welayta Dicha: 8.6 shots per match, Mebrat Hayl: 7.0.

Match halves

Welayta Dicha: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.63. Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Welayta Dicha: 61-75 (10 goals). Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Welayta Dicha holds an edge in chance quality and current form: home average xG is 1.31 versus 1.15 for Mebrat Hayl, and in the last 5 matches Welayta scored 5 and conceded 2 (1.0 scored and 0.4 conceded per match), while the visitors scored 6 and conceded 6 (1.2 and 1.2). At home Welayta averages 8.24 shots and 3.06 on target per match with a 14% conversion rate, whereas Mebrat Hayl away averages 7.06 shots, 2.12 on target and 11% conversion, translating into superior offensive efficiency for the hosts. Defense also favors the hosts — Welayta concedes 0.88 goals at home on average with xG against 0.97, while the visitors concede 0.94 goals away on average with xG against 1.13; additionally Mebrat Hayl lose 47% of away matches, whereas Welayta records only 18% home defeats. However, a high share of home draws (53% of home matches end level) and moderate home goal output (1.12 goals per match) indicate the game may be low-scoring with a real risk of a points split. Considering the xG advantage (1.31 vs 1.15), better conversion (14% vs 11%) and an average of 1.8 points per match in the last 5 fixtures versus 1.0 for the visitors, I tip a home win.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
15Shots8
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
3Shots on target3
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
1.56xG1.15
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
6Corners4
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
56Dangerous attacks59
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
7Fouls10
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
0Cards0
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
0.97Goals scored / match0.84
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
0.82Goals conceded / match0.68
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
47%Average possession53%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
3.03Shots on target / match2.21
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.58Shots per match7
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
3.03Shots on target2.21
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
11.3%Shot conversion12%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
47%Possession53%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
1.31xG for1.12
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
0.99xG against1.16
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl

Shooting quality

Welayta Dicha: BalancedMebrat Hayl: Balanced
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
Accuracy (shots on target)35%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Welayta Dicha
DWLWD
Season result split
29% W47% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-18-9
1.34 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-10-4
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
WDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Mebrat Hayl
LDWDW
Season result split
34% W39% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-10
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-8
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Welayta Dicha is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

0.97 goals / match - Welayta Dicha · 0.84 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Mebrat Hayl is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.82 goals / match - Welayta Dicha · 0.68 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Welayta Dicha scoring profile: mixed

Welayta Dicha scores in 61% of matches (23 of 38 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 47% (18 of 38 matches).

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: mixed

Mebrat Hayl scores in 55% of matches (21 of 38 matches), while Welayta Dicha keeps a clean sheet in 42% (16 of 38 matches).

37Goals scored (season)32
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
31Goals conceded (season)26
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
1.79Average goals in match1.53
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
2Goals conceded (last 5)4
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal55%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
24%2 goals18%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
11%3 goals8%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
3%4 goals3%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal53%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
21%2 goals16%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
3%3 goals0%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
0%4 goals0%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time5%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
11%Scored in both halves11%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
20%BTTS - last 560%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time39%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mebrat Hayl is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Welayta Dicha · 1.29 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl

Welayta Dicha - half-time state
18% leading58% draw24% trailing
Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
21% leading66% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.29
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.34
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
0.76Average goals (1st half)0.55
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
66%Clean sheet before half-time82%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
68%No goal before half-time74%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
0.39Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
1.03Average goals (2nd half)0.97
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
63%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl
61%No goal after half-time61%
Welayta DichaMebrat Hayl

Welayta Dicha - second-half results

29% W50% R21% P
43
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

26% W50% R24% P
49
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Welayta Dicha - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Welayta Dicha
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
7
9
31-45
5
2
46-60
10
5
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
7
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Welayta Dicha

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Welayta DichaLigaMebrat Hayl
Average goals in match 1.791.78 1.53
Both teams scored 45%40% 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%28% 26%
Clean sheets 42%40% 47%
Goal before half-time 53%56% 39%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Welayta Dicha 0 - 1 - 0 Mebrat Hayl. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Welayta Dicha vs Mebrat Hayl?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Welayta Dicha 1:2 Mebrat Hayl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Welayta Dicha vs Mebrat Hayl?

Welayta Dicha score 0.97 goals per game on average and Mebrat Hayl 0.84. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Welayta Dicha's matches and 37% of Mebrat Hayl's.

What form are Welayta Dicha and Mebrat Hayl in?

Over the last 5 games Welayta Dicha have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Mebrat Hayl 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Welayta Dicha vs Mebrat Hayl?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Welayta Dicha vs Mebrat Hayl: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.