Welayta Dicha vs Mebrat Hayl: match statistics
Welayta Dicha vs Mebrat Hayl: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Welayta Dicha played Mebrat Hayl in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 22 June 2026. Venue: Wolaita Soddo Stadium. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Welayta Dicha: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Mebrat Hayl: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Welayta Dicha scores 0.97 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Mebrat Hayl scores 0.80 and concedes 0.69. League average: 1.77 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Welayta Dicha 46%, Mebrat Hayl 34%. Over 2.5: Welayta Dicha 26%, Mebrat Hayl 26%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Welayta Dicha has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.10. Welayta Dicha: 8.4 shots per match, Mebrat Hayl: 6.8.
Match halves
Welayta Dicha: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.63. Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.49.
Goals by minute
Welayta Dicha: 61-75 (10 goals). Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.77 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Welayta Dicha holds an edge in chance quality and current form: home average xG is 1.31 versus 1.15 for Mebrat Hayl, and in the last 5 matches Welayta scored 5 and conceded 2 (1.0 scored and 0.4 conceded per match), while the visitors scored 6 and conceded 6 (1.2 and 1.2). At home Welayta averages 8.24 shots and 3.06 on target per match with a 14% conversion rate, whereas Mebrat Hayl away averages 7.06 shots, 2.12 on target and 11% conversion, translating into superior offensive efficiency for the hosts. Defense also favors the hosts — Welayta concedes 0.88 goals at home on average with xG against 0.97, while the visitors concede 0.94 goals away on average with xG against 1.13; additionally Mebrat Hayl lose 47% of away matches, whereas Welayta records only 18% home defeats. However, a high share of home draws (53% of home matches end level) and moderate home goal output (1.12 goals per match) indicate the game may be low-scoring with a real risk of a points split. Considering the xG advantage (1.31 vs 1.15), better conversion (14% vs 11%) and an average of 1.8 points per match in the last 5 fixtures versus 1.0 for the visitors, I tip a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have season BTTS rates of 33% (Welayta Dicha) and 35% (Mebrat Hayl), yielding a baseline BTTS probability of ~34%, below the league average of 41%. Form signals are mixed: in the last 5 matches the home side has BTTS in only 20% while the visitors are at 80%, so recent form favors goals from the away team but not the home team. Defensive edge lies with the hosts – Welayta concedes 0.44 goals per match versus 0.94 for the visitors and keeps a clean sheet in 56% of appearances (away team 41%), while both sides have low goals scored averages: 0.83 and 0.76. xG indicates moderate chance creation (1.05 vs 1.15), xG against is 1.12 and 1.13, and shots on target are 2.12 each with conversion rates of 13% and 11%, suggesting limited finishing and fewer goals. Considering the 34% BTTS base, the high home clean sheet rate of 56% and the league clean sheet level of 80%, a no-BTTS scenario is more likely; recommendation: 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total expected goals at 1.91: expected_goals_home = 0.96 (average between season goals 0.83 and xG-based forecast 1.09) and expected_goals_away = 0.95 (average between season 0.76 and xG-based ~1.14). A Poisson model with λ=1.91 yields roughly a 57% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 30% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and only ~13% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Seasonal indicators confirm a moderately low scoring tempo: Over 2.5 occurred for home teams 22% and away teams 29%, with the league average 28%; additionally clean sheets occur in 56% of home matches and 41% of away matches, which favors the Under. Shot statistics (6.65 and 7.06) with conversion rates of 13% and 11% produce expected goals ≈0.86 and ≈0.78, close to seasonals 0.83 and 0.76, so there is no strong signal for a high-scoring game. Based on this, the strongest signal is Under 2.5 (70% chance), although Over 1.5 remains moderately possible (57%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data indicate a strong signal for a Half-Time draw: Welayta Dicha were level at the break in 78% of their matches, and Mebrat Hayl in 53% of fixtures, which strongly supports a draw after 45 minutes. Over the full match the home side have the advantage — at home they score on average 0.83 goals and concede 0.44, win 50% of matches and collect 1.67 points per game on average, while the visitors concede 0.94 goals on average and win only 24% of games. xG is similar (1.05 for the hosts versus 1.15 for the visitors), but the hosts have better shot conversion 13% versus 11%, which favors them in converting chances after the break. Additionally, most goals occur after half-time — the hosts scored 6 goals in the 46–60 minute window compared to 3 for the visitors and have an average of 1.06 goals in second halves, so I expect a turnaround after the break. On this basis I rate the strongest signal as a Half-Time draw with a Home win at Full-Time (X/1) with an estimated probability of 34%; alternatives are Draw/Draw 22% and Draw/Home loss (Draw/Away win) 9%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Welayta Dicha | Mebrat Hayl | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Welayta Dicha is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Welayta Dicha · 1 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Welayta Dicha is 21% better for: goals scored per match.
0.97 goals / match - Welayta Dicha · 0.8 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl
Mebrat Hayl is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.83 goals / match - Welayta Dicha · 0.69 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl
Welayta Dicha scores in 60% of matches (21 of 35 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 49% (17 of 35 matches).
Mebrat Hayl scores in 51% of matches (18 of 35 matches), while Welayta Dicha keeps a clean sheet in 40% (14 of 35 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Welayta Dicha
Over / Under - Mebrat Hayl
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mebrat Hayl is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / match - Welayta Dicha · 1.26 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Welayta Dicha - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Mebrat Hayl - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Welayta Dicha
Mebrat Hayl
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Welayta Dicha | Liga | Mebrat Hayl | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.80 | 1.77 | ▼ 1.49 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 46% | 40% | ▼ 34% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 26% | 28% | ▼ 26% |
| Clean sheets | • 40% | 40% | ▲ 49% |
| Goal before half-time | • 54% | 54% | ▼ 37% |
| Goal after half-time | • 60% | 59% | • 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Welayta Dicha 0 - 1 - 0 Mebrat Hayl. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Welayta Dicha vs Mebrat Hayl?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Welayta Dicha 1:2 Mebrat Hayl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Welayta Dicha vs Mebrat Hayl?
Welayta Dicha score 0.97 goals per game on average and Mebrat Hayl 0.80. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Welayta Dicha's matches and 34% of Mebrat Hayl's.
What form are Welayta Dicha and Mebrat Hayl in?
Over the last 5 games Welayta Dicha have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Mebrat Hayl 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Welayta Dicha vs Mebrat Hayl?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Welayta Dicha vs Mebrat Hayl: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


