Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Welwalo Adigrat Uni vs Fasil Ketema: match statistics
Welwalo Adigrat Uni vs Fasil Ketema: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Welwalo Adigrat Uni play Fasil Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: Adigrat Stadium.
Current form
Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match. Fasil Ketema: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Welwalo Adigrat Uni scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Fasil Ketema scores 0.00 and concedes 0.00. League average: 1.22 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Welwalo Adigrat Uni 100%, Fasil Ketema 0%. Over 2.5: Welwalo Adigrat Uni 0%, Fasil Ketema 0%. League level: BTTS 22%, Over 2.5 0%.
xG, shots and style
Welwalo Adigrat Uni has higher xG: 1.24 vs 0.80. Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 10.0 shots per match, Fasil Ketema: 4.0.
Match halves
Welwalo Adigrat Uni: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00.
Goals by minute
Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 76-90+ (1 goals). Fasil Ketema: 0-15 (0 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.22 goals per match, BTTS 22%, Over 2.5 0%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Welwalo Adigrat Uni | Fasil Ketema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 20% | 0% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Welwalo Adigrat Uni scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).
Fasil Ketema scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Welwalo Adigrat Uni keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Welwalo Adigrat Uni
Over / Under - Fasil Ketema
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Welwalo Adigrat Uni - second-half results
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Fasil Ketema - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Welwalo Adigrat Uni
Fasil Ketema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Welwalo Adigrat Uni | Liga | Fasil Ketema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.00 | 1.22 | ▼ 0.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 22% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 0% | 0% | • 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 44% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 0% | 44% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 56% | ▼ 0% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Welwalo Adigrat Uni 1 - 0 - 1 Fasil Ketema. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.