Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueAdigrat StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Welwalo Adigrat Uni vs Kedus Giorgis: match statistics

Welwalo Adigrat Uni vs Kedus Giorgis: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Welwalo Adigrat Uni played Kedus Giorgis in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 2 July 2026. Venue: Adigrat Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Kedus Giorgis: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Welwalo Adigrat Uni scores 0.82 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Kedus Giorgis scores 0.89 and concedes 0.83. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Welwalo Adigrat Uni 45%, Kedus Giorgis 31%. Over 2.5: Welwalo Adigrat Uni 32%, Kedus Giorgis 25%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Kedus Giorgis has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.03. Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 5.7 shots per match, Kedus Giorgis: 8.1.

Match halves

Welwalo Adigrat Uni: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.37. Kedus Giorgis: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.36.

Goals by minute

Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 76-90+ (7 goals). Kedus Giorgis: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kedus Giorgis sits 4th in the table with a record of 14 wins, 10 draws and 12 losses and goals 32–30, while Welwalo Adigrat Uni are 14th with a 10–15–12 record and goals 31–35. In the last 5 matches the visitors have won 4 and drawn 1, scoring 7 and conceding 1 (avg 1.4 scored and 0.2 conceded per game), while the hosts have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss with only 2 scored and 2 conceded (0.4/0.4). Kedus creates more chances: on average 8.76 shots and 3.53 on target per game with xG 1.24 away, versus 5.94 shots, 2.0 on target and xG 1.01 at home, which suggests a qualitative advantage in the visitors’ attack. Although the visitors have a higher share of goalless away matches (FTS 53% vs 33% for the hosts at home), Welwalo score only 0.78 goals at home on average and have a home goal difference of -6, which weakens their home advantage. Considering form (avg 2.6 points per game in the last 5 vs 1.2 for the hosts), superior xG and a greater number of chances, I predict a Kedus Giorgis victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict No Goal (BTTS - No) at 70% and BTTS - Yes at 30%. Seasonal BTTS rates are low — Welwalo 26% and Kedus 35% — and in the last 5 matches both teams combined show only 20% BTTS. Strong defensive signal from the league: 81% of matches end in a clean sheet, and Welwalo at home has 58% clean sheets, reducing the likelihood of the home side conceding (on average 0.58 goals conceded per match this season). Offensive xG for both teams is similar (1.23 vs 1.24), but seasonal goals averages are 1.0 for the home team and 0.76 for the away team, and the away side’s shot conversion is only 9% versus 13% for the home side, which limits the realistic goal output. Kedus has better form over the last 5 (7 goals, 1.4 per game) than Welwalo (2 goals, 0.4), but BTTS in the last 5 is only 20% for both, so the clean-sheet signal and low seasonal BTTS dominate.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model projects expected goals: home 1.16 (average of home attacking xG 1.23 and xG against visitors 1.09), away 1.13 (average of away attacking xG 1.24 and xG against hosts 1.02), yielding a total of 2.29 expected goals. Seasonally hosts score 1.0 goals on average, visitors 0.76 (total 1.76), but both teams show a high share of matches with at least one goal: 84% for hosts and 94% for visitors. In the last 5 matches the home side scored 2 goals (0.4 per match), the away side 7 goals (1.4 per match) and present better form (away team has 4 wins in the last 5), which increases the likelihood of multiple strikes. Using a Poisson distribution with sum lambda=2.29 yields probabilities of over 1.5 ≈ 67%, over 2.5 ≈ 40% and over 3.5 ≈ 20%, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1), because both teams have the same average goals at the break (0.53) and record a half-time draw in 47% of matches, which increases the probability of a draw in the first half. After the break Welwalo holds a clear advantage: they score an average of 0.47 goals in the second half versus 0.24 for Kedus, have a positive second-half goal difference of +3 compared to -7, and have collected 27 points in second halves versus 15 for their opponents, so a turnaround from a half-time draw in their favor is a realistic possibility. Over the season the home side performs better (1.74 points per game vs 1.12 for the visitors and 47% wins vs 29%), but Kedus’s form must be considered — they have an 80% win rate in their last five matches and led at half-time in 80% of those games, so I do not rule out the visitors leading at the break. The teams’ xG is virtually identical (1.23 vs 1.24) and the visitors register more shots on target (3.53 vs 2.78), therefore I assign the highest probability to X/1 (28%), then X/X (16%) and 1/1 (24%), with lower chances for scenarios favoring the visitors’ form (2/2 11%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
6Shots2
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
1Shots on target1
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
1xG0.7
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
2Corners2
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
75Dangerous attacks67
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
4Fouls6
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
0Cards0
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
0.82Goals scored / match0.89
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
0.97Goals conceded / match0.83
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
46%Average possession48%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
2.08Shots on target / match3.03
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.74Shots per match8.11
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
2.08Shots on target3.03
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
14.2%Shot conversion11%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
46%Possession48%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
1.03xG for1.24
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
1.11xG against1.05
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis

Shooting quality

Welwalo Adigrat Uni: Counter-attackingKedus Giorgis: Balanced
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kedus Giorgis is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Welwalo Adigrat Uni · 2.6 pts / match - Kedus Giorgis

Welwalo Adigrat Uni
DDDLW
Season result split
26% W39% R34% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-15-13
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-9
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Kedus Giorgis
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
39% W28% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-12
1.44 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-8
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kedus Giorgis is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

0.82 goals / match - Welwalo Adigrat Uni · 0.89 goals / match - Kedus Giorgis

Kedus Giorgis is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.97 goals / match - Welwalo Adigrat Uni · 0.83 goals / match - Kedus Giorgis

Welwalo Adigrat Uni scoring profile: mixed

Welwalo Adigrat Uni scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Kedus Giorgis keeps a clean sheet in 39% (14 of 36 matches).

Kedus Giorgis scoring profile: mixed

Kedus Giorgis scores in 58% of matches (21 of 36 matches), while Welwalo Adigrat Uni keeps a clean sheet in 37% (14 of 38 matches).

31Goals scored (season)32
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
37Goals conceded (season)30
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
1.79Average goals in match1.72
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
2Goals scored (last 5)7
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
2Goals conceded (last 5)1
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal58%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
18%2 goals19%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
3%3 goals8%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
3%4 goals3%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal61%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
29%2 goals17%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
3%3 goals6%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
3%4 goals0%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
Welwalo Adigrat Uni - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 38 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time14%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
11%Scored in both halves8%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
20%BTTS - last 520%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis

2nd half

45%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kedus Giorgis is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Welwalo Adigrat Uni · 1.47 pts / match - Kedus Giorgis

Welwalo Adigrat Uni - half-time state
21% leading58% draw21% trailing
Kedus Giorgis - half-time state
33% leading47% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.47
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
0.92Average goals (1st half)0.89
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
58%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
58%No goal before half-time61%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.17
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
0.37Goals scored (2nd half)0.36
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
0.82Average goals (2nd half)0.83
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
68%Clean sheet after half-time64%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis
74%No goal after half-time72%
Welwalo Adigrat UniKedus Giorgis

Welwalo Adigrat Uni - second-half results

16% W63% R21% P
46
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kedus Giorgis - second-half results

25% W42% R33% P
53
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Welwalo Adigrat Uni - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match0.80.0
1 goal60%0%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kedus Giorgis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.40
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match1.20.4
1 goal80%20%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Welwalo Adigrat Uni
ScoredConceded
5
11
0-15
6
3
16-30
6
6
31-45
1
4
46-60
6
9
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Kedus Giorgis
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
7
4
16-30
9
7
31-45
2
9
46-60
3
4
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Welwalo Adigrat Uni

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Kedus Giorgis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Welwalo Adigrat UniLigaKedus Giorgis
Average goals in match 1.791.78 1.72
Both teams scored 45%40% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%28% 25%
Clean sheets 37%40% 39%
Goal before half-time 63%56% 58%
Goal after half-time 45%59% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Hafiz Wontah Konkoni⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Welwalo Adigrat UniGoalHafiz Wontah Konkoni

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Welwalo Adigrat Uni 0 - 1 - 0 Kedus Giorgis. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Welwalo Adigrat Uni vs Kedus Giorgis?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Welwalo Adigrat Uni 1:1 Kedus Giorgis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Welwalo Adigrat Uni vs Kedus Giorgis?

Welwalo Adigrat Uni score 0.82 goals per game on average and Kedus Giorgis 0.89. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Welwalo Adigrat Uni's matches and 31% of Kedus Giorgis's.

What form are Welwalo Adigrat Uni and Kedus Giorgis in?

Over the last 5 games Welwalo Adigrat Uni have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Kedus Giorgis 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Welwalo Adigrat Uni vs Kedus Giorgis?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.