Welwalo Adigrat Uni vs Mebrat Hayl: match statistics
Welwalo Adigrat Uni vs Mebrat Hayl: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Welwalo Adigrat Uni played Mebrat Hayl in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Mebrat Hayl: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Welwalo Adigrat Uni scores 0.84 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Mebrat Hayl scores 0.81 and concedes 0.61. League average: 1.80 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Welwalo Adigrat Uni 47%, Mebrat Hayl 29%. Over 2.5: Welwalo Adigrat Uni 34%, Mebrat Hayl 23%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.
xG, shots and style
Mebrat Hayl has higher xG: 1.15 vs 1.01. Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 5.4 shots per match, Mebrat Hayl: 7.1.
Match halves
Welwalo Adigrat Uni: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.41. Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.52.
Goals by minute
Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 76-90+ (7 goals). Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.80 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mebrat Hayl are the favorites: they sit 4th in the table versus Welwalo Adigrat Uni in 16th, and have 11 wins this season compared to 8 wins by the home side; in the last 5 matches both teams averaged 1.4 points (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses). The visitors have a clearer defensive edge — they concede 0.8 goals on average away versus 1.13 conceded by the hosts at home, a difference of 0.33 goals conceded per game; additionally Mebrat have 47% clean sheets away compared to 33% for Welwalo. Offensively both teams score 0.73 goals on average (Welwalo at home 0.73, Mebrat away 0.73), but the visitors create more chances: 7.6 shots and 2.2 on target per game versus 5.4 and 1.93 for the hosts, and xG is 1.22 for Mebrat away versus 0.97 for Welwalo at home. Mebrat’s issue is a high share of away matches without scoring (53%), while Welwalo have better shot conversion 14% versus 10% for the visitors, which narrows the gap. Considering the superior league position, lower goals conceded average and higher xG for the visitors, I predict a Mebrat Hayl win ('2'); estimated probabilities roughly 20% home, 30% draw and 50% away.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates for both teams are low: Welwalo 31% and Mebrat 27%, both below the league average of 41%, indicating a lower propensity for Goal/Goal outcomes. Additionally, clean sheets occur frequently — Welwalo records 56% home matches without conceding, Mebrat 47%, while the league shows 80% matches with a clean sheet, increasing the likelihood of No Goal on one side. Seasonal goal averages are low: Welwalo scores 0.88 goals per match, Mebrat 0.73, with xG of 1.06 and 1.22 respectively — both teams generate around 1 xG but poor finishing reduces actual goals (conversion 14% for the home side and 10% for the away). In the short term there is some opening — in the last 5 matches Welwalo has 60% BTTS with averages of 1.6 scored and 1.2 conceded, and Mebrat 40% BTTS with 1.0/0.8, which partially lifts the chances of both teams scoring. In summary, the weight of seasonal and league signals (BTTS 31%/27%, clean sheets 56%/47% and low averages 0.88/0.73) outweighs the short-term improvement, therefore I recommend No BTTS (clean sheet expected / more likely No Goal outcome).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: Welwalo has xG_for 1.06, Mebrat 1.22, and xG_against 1.07 and 1.20 respectively; averaging these I project 1.13 goals for the home side and 1.15 for the visitors, totaling 2.28 goals. A Poisson model on a 2.28 mean indicates the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is around 66–67%, making Over 1.5 the strongest signal. Seasonal Over 2.5 rates are low: 25% for Welwalo and 20% for Mebrat, and both-teams-to-score (BTTS) rates are only 31% and 27%, which argues for Under 2.5 (I estimate ~60%). In the last 5 matches Welwalo had Over 2.5 in 60% of games, while Mebrat only 20%, so signals diverge but the combined analysis favors Under 2.5. The chance of over 3.5 goals is small — seasonally 13%/7%, and the xG model gives Over 3.5 around 20%, so I rate Under 3.5 at ~80%. Additionally, shot counts 6.8 (home) vs 7.6 (away) and conversion rates 14% vs 10% suggest moderate chance creation, confirming Over 1.5 as the most sensible bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is that the score will be level at half-time: the home team were level at the break in 13 of 16 matches (81%) and kept a clean sheet at half-time in 94% of fixtures, with a home half-time goals average of 0.13 versus 0.47 for the visitors. After the interval the home side tend to be more active — they scored 6 goals in minutes 46–60 compared with 3 for the away team, and 4 goals in minutes 76–90 versus 1 for the visitors, indicating a home advantage in the second half. The away team concede on average 0.8 goals per match (seasonConcededAVG_away = 0.8), while the home side have a lower conceded average of 0.44 (seasonConcededAVG_home = 0.44) and 56% of matches with a clean sheet this season, which increases the likelihood of the hosts winning after a goalless or draw HT. In light of these numbers the strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a home win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Welwalo Adigrat Uni | Mebrat Hayl | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mebrat Hayl is 74% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.06 goals / match - Welwalo Adigrat Uni · 0.61 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl
Welwalo Adigrat Uni scores in 59% of matches (19 of 32 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 52% (16 of 31 matches).
Mebrat Hayl scores in 48% of matches (15 of 31 matches), while Welwalo Adigrat Uni keeps a clean sheet in 34% (11 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Welwalo Adigrat Uni
Over / Under - Mebrat Hayl
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Welwalo Adigrat Uni - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Mebrat Hayl - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Welwalo Adigrat Uni
Mebrat Hayl
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Welwalo Adigrat Uni | Liga | Mebrat Hayl | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 1.91 | 1.80 | ▼ 1.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 47% | 41% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 34% | 27% | ▼ 23% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 34% | 40% | ▲ 52% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 63% | 54% | ▼ 32% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▼ 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Welwalo Adigrat UniGoalHafiz Wontah Konkoni
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Welwalo Adigrat Uni 0 - 1 - 0 Mebrat Hayl. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Welwalo Adigrat Uni vs Mebrat Hayl?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Welwalo Adigrat Uni 3:0 Mebrat Hayl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Welwalo Adigrat Uni vs Mebrat Hayl?
Welwalo Adigrat Uni score 0.84 goals per game on average and Mebrat Hayl 0.81. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Welwalo Adigrat Uni's matches and 29% of Mebrat Hayl's.
What form are Welwalo Adigrat Uni and Mebrat Hayl in?
Over the last 5 games Welwalo Adigrat Uni have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Mebrat Hayl 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Welwalo Adigrat Uni vs Mebrat Hayl?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Welwalo Adigrat Uni vs Mebrat Hayl: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


