West Ham United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: match statistics
West Ham United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
West Ham United played Wolverhampton Wanderers in Premier League (England). The match was played on 10 April 2026. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
West Ham United: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Wolverhampton Wanderers: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
West Ham United scores 1.16 and concedes 1.84 goals per match. Wolverhampton Wanderers scores 0.77 and concedes 1.74. League average: 2.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: West Ham United 58%, Wolverhampton Wanderers 45%. Over 2.5: West Ham United 58%, Wolverhampton Wanderers 45%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
West Ham United has higher xG: 1.17 vs 1.10. West Ham United: 10.1 shots per match, Wolverhampton Wanderers: 9.2.
Match halves
West Ham United: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.52. Wolverhampton Wanderers: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.42.
Goals by minute
West Ham United: 0-15 (9 goals). Wolverhampton Wanderers: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier League: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1) because West Ham averages 1.2 goals at home with an xG of 1.20, while Wolverhampton average only 0.47 goals on the road with an xG of 1.07. Additionally, West Ham register 3.4 on-target shots and 10.47 total shots per home match versus the visitors’ 3.0 on-target and 9.0 total — the home side’s shot conversion is 11% compared to Wolves’ 5%, indicating a clear efficiency advantage. Both defenses are susceptible: West Ham concede 1.87 goals at home and Wolves 1.53 away, and both teams have only 7% of matches with a clean sheet, so I expect an open game with goals. In the last 5 matches West Ham have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss (1.2 points per game), while Wolves have 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses (1.4 points per game), but Wolves have yet to record an away win this season. Considering the efficiency edge (11% vs 5%) and the lower share of matches without scoring for the home side (33% vs 60%), I give West Ham the higher probability of winning, though a draw remains possible.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
In the last 5 matches both West Ham and Wolves registered BTTS in 60% of games, providing a strong recent signal. Season averages show West Ham scores 1.06 and concedes 1.94, while Wolves score 0.47 and concede 1.53, so both teams are prone to conceding, especially West Ham. Additionally, in the last 5 matches West Ham scored 6 and conceded 7, and Wolves scored 7 and conceded 7, confirming both sides have been involved in goal-filled games recently. xG supports that they create chances: West Ham xG_for 1.12 vs Wolves 1.07, with xG_against 1.51 and 1.76, and clean sheets are only 19% and 7% — this favors BTTS. Considering the last 5 (both 60% BTTS), the league BTTS rate of 56% and low clean sheet percentages, I assess the probability of BTTS at 70% vs 30% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals are 1.44 for West Ham and 1.29 for Wolverhampton (total 2.73), calculated as the average of attack and defense: home xG_for 1.12 vs away xG_against 1.76 and away xG_for 1.07 vs home xG_against 1.51. Seasonal metrics reinforce this picture: West Ham has 88% of matches over 1.5 and 94% with at least one goal, Wolves 67% and 93% respectively, while clean sheet percentages are only 19% (West Ham) and 7% (Wolves), which increases the likelihood of goals. A Poisson model with combined xG 2.73 yields P(>=2) ≈75.7% and P(>=3) ≈51.4%, therefore I assign Over 1.5 at 78% and Over 2.5 at 50%. Over 3.5 is priced at 29% (Poisson P(>=4) ≈29% and seasonal over3.5: 44% West Ham vs 7% Wolves, average ≈25%), making that line less attractive. Based on this, the best signal is Over 1.5 (line 1.5, side Over) due to high xG and strong seasonal over1.5 percentages.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time a draw is most likely: West Ham were level at the break in 50% of matches and Wolverhampton in 47%, giving roughly a 49% chance of a draw after 45 minutes. After the break West Ham have the edge — the hosts average 0.5 goals in the second half versus 0.33 for the visitors, and their xG is 1.12 compared with Wolverhampton’s 1.07, indicating a slight advantage in chance creation. Additionally West Ham convert shots at 11% versus 5% for the visitors and score on average 0.56 goals before the break compared with 0.13 for the opponent, so the hosts more often finish key opportunities. Wolverhampton have not recorded an away win this season (0% wins), while West Ham concede 1.94 goals per match versus 1.53 for the visitors, which lowers the probability of an away victory. Therefore the strongest signal is X/1 (draw at half-time, home win at full-time), with moderate probability also for X/X and 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| West Ham United | Wolverhampton Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wolverhampton Wanderers is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - West Ham United · 1.6 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
West Ham United is 51% better for: goals scored per match.
1.16 goals / match - West Ham United · 0.77 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Wolverhampton Wanderers is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.84 goals / match - West Ham United · 1.74 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers
West Ham United scores in 68% of matches (21 of 31 matches), while Wolverhampton Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 31 matches).
Wolverhampton Wanderers scores in 52% of matches (16 of 31 matches), while West Ham United keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - West Ham United
Over / Under - Wolverhampton Wanderers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
West Ham United is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / match - West Ham United · 0.68 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
West Ham United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 23%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wolverhampton Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 10%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
West Ham United
Wolverhampton Wanderers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).
Teams vs league
| West Ham United | Liga | Wolverhampton Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.73 | ▼ 2.52 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 56% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 53% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 26% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 70% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 79% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- West Ham UnitedSubstitutionOn: Callum Eddie Graham WilsonOff: Valentín Mariano José Castellanos Giménez
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: West Ham United 0 - 0 - 1 Wolverhampton Wanderers. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of West Ham United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?
The Premier League match finished West Ham United 4:0 Wolverhampton Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before West Ham United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?
West Ham United score 1.16 goals per game on average and Wolverhampton Wanderers 0.77. The Premier League average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 58% of West Ham United's matches and 45% of Wolverhampton Wanderers's.
What form are West Ham United and Wolverhampton Wanderers in?
Over the last 5 games West Ham United have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Wolverhampton Wanderers 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for West Ham United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for West Ham United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.