Wigan Athletic vs Wycombe Wanderers: match statistics
Wigan Athletic vs Wycombe Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wigan Athletic played Wycombe Wanderers in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Venue: The DW Stadium. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Wigan Athletic: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Wycombe Wanderers: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wigan Athletic scores 0.83 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. Wycombe Wanderers scores 1.67 and concedes 2.33. League average: 3.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wigan Athletic 33%, Wycombe Wanderers 100%. Over 2.5: Wigan Athletic 50%, Wycombe Wanderers 67%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Wigan Athletic has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.44. Wigan Athletic: 14.8 shots per match, Wycombe Wanderers: 11.7.
Match halves
Wigan Athletic: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.67. Wycombe Wanderers: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Wigan Athletic: 61-75 (3 goals). Wycombe Wanderers: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League One: 3.04 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wycombe Wanderers are slight favorites, having scored 9 goals in their last five matches compared with Wigan’s 3, while their points-per-game averages over this period stand at 1.0 and 0.8, respectively. Away from home, the visitors average 1.67 goals and have failed to score in none of their matches, whereas Wigan have been held scoreless in 67% of their home games. Wycombe create lower-quality chances according to xG, 1.30 versus the hosts’ 1.47, but record significantly more shots on target away from home: 5.33 compared with Wigan’s 3.00, while their finishing efficiency is 16% versus 7%. Both defenses are clearly vulnerable, with Wigan conceding 2.33 goals per home match and Wycombe 2.67 away, and neither side has kept a clean sheet. The visitors’ edge in current attacking output and finishing efficiency gives them a greater chance of winning, although the open nature of both defenses leaves a significant draw risk.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data clearly supports goals at both ends: Wigan and Wycombe have a BTTS rate of 100%, while neither side has kept a clean sheet or finished a match without scoring. Wigan average 1.67 goals, while Wycombe concede as many as 2.67, and the hosts create an average of 1.58 xG with 6.0 shots on target per match. The visitors also offer attacking arguments, averaging 1.67 goals, while Wigan’s defense allows an average of 2.0 goals. Caution is warranted based on Wigan’s last five matches, in which the team scored just 3 goals and recorded BTTS in 20% of games; however, Wycombe scored 1.8 goals per match during the same period and had BTTS in 100% of their appearances. The combination of weak defenses and high recent xG figures for both teams—1.53 and 1.45—slightly favors a scenario in which both sides score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have exceeded 1.5 goals in 100% of their league matches so far, and neither has kept a clean sheet. Wycombe concede an average of as many as 2.67 goals per match, with an average xG against of 1.95, which clearly strengthens the outlook for Wigan goals, whose own xG stands at 1.58. The hosts are also defensively vulnerable, conceding 2.00 goals per match, while Wycombe score an average of 1.67 goals. The league average is 3.08 goals, and 67% of each team’s matches have ended Over 2.5 goals, although Wigan’s weaker recent finishing lowers confidence in higher goal lines. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as the data on both teams’ consistent scoring and lack of clean sheets clearly makes a one-goal maximum scenario unlikely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is Wycombe leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until the final whistle, as the visitors had taken the lead after 45 minutes in 2 of their 3 matches so far, while Wigan were trailing in 2 of 3. In their last five matches, the hosts averaged just 0.2 goals before half-time, whereas Wycombe scored 1.2 goals during this phase. Wigan are in poor form, suffering 3 defeats in their last 5 matches, and scored only 0.6 goals per game over this period. Wycombe also concede frequently, averaging 2.6 goals conceded across their last five appearances, so the chances of a draw or a turnaround by the hosts after half-time remain relatively high. Nevertheless, the visitors have a better points return this season, 1.33 compared with Wigan’s 0.67, as well as a higher win rate—33% versus 0% for the hosts—which strengthens the 2/2 HT/FT scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wigan Athletic | Wycombe Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 22% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wycombe Wanderers is 25% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Wigan Athletic · 1 pts / match - Wycombe Wanderers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wycombe Wanderers is 101% better for: goals scored per match.
0.83 goals / match - Wigan Athletic · 1.67 goals / match - Wycombe Wanderers
Wigan Athletic is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.83 goals / match - Wigan Athletic · 2.33 goals / match - Wycombe Wanderers
Wigan Athletic scores in 33% of matches (2 of 6 matches), while Wycombe Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).
Wycombe Wanderers scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Wigan Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wigan Athletic
Over / Under - Wycombe Wanderers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wycombe Wanderers is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / match - Wigan Athletic · 1.5 pts / match - Wycombe Wanderers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wigan Athletic - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Wycombe Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wigan Athletic
Wycombe Wanderers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Wigan Athletic | Liga | Wycombe Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.67 | 3.04 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 64% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 59% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 23% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 68% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 81% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Wigan Athletic 0 - 0 - 2 Wycombe Wanderers. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Wigan Athletic vs Wycombe Wanderers?
The EFL League One match finished Wigan Athletic 0:1 Wycombe Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Wigan Athletic and Wycombe Wanderers?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Wigan Athletic won 0, Wycombe Wanderers won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Wigan Athletic vs Wycombe Wanderers?
Wigan Athletic score 0.83 goals per game on average and Wycombe Wanderers 1.67. The EFL League One average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Wigan Athletic's matches and 100% of Wycombe Wanderers's.
What form are Wigan Athletic and Wycombe Wanderers in?
Over the last 5 games Wigan Athletic have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Wycombe Wanderers 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wigan Athletic vs Wycombe Wanderers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Wigan Athletic vs Wycombe Wanderers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


