Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC: match statistics
Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wuhan Three Towns played Chengdu Better City FC in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 17 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Wuhan Three Towns: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Chengdu Better City FC: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wuhan Three Towns scores 1.60 and concedes 2.20 goals per match. Chengdu Better City FC scores 3.20 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wuhan Three Towns 80%, Chengdu Better City FC 80%. Over 2.5: Wuhan Three Towns 60%, Chengdu Better City FC 80%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Chengdu Better City FC has higher xG: 1.99 vs 1.10. Wuhan Three Towns: 9.2 shots per match, Chengdu Better City FC: 16.6.
Match halves
Wuhan Three Towns: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.20. Chengdu Better City FC: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.80.
Goals by minute
Wuhan Three Towns: 61-75 (4 goals). Chengdu Better City FC: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win (Chengdu Better City) based on a clear statistical advantage: they sit 1st with 4 wins and 1 draw and a goals record of 16:6, while Wuhan Three Towns have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses with a 8:11 record. In the last 5 matches Chengdu scored 16 goals and average 2.6 points per game, whereas Wuhan scored 8 and average 0.8 points per game, indicating a large gap in points efficiency. The visitors create better chances (average xG 1.52 vs hosts’ 1.19, 12 shots per game vs 10 and 5 shots on target vs 4), with comparable shot conversion (21% vs 20%), so the offensive superiority is measurable. Wuhan have been conceding heavily recently (11 goals in the last 5 matches, i.e. 2.2 per game) and have 50% of home matches without scoring, while Chengdu have 0% away matches without a goal, therefore I rate the visitors’ chances higher.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonally BTTS occurs for the home team in 67% of matches and for the away team in 100%; in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 80%, which is a strong signal that both sides typically score. The away team has 0% clean sheets this season, the home team only 33% clean sheets; additionally the home side conceded an average of 2.2 goals in the last 5 matches while the away team scored an average of 3.2 goals, indicating weaker home defense and away offensive form. In terms of xG the away team has xG 1.99 in the last 5 matches while the home team has xG against 1.7 in that period; season xG is 2.3 for the home side versus 1.52 for the away side, which confirms both teams have realistic scoring chances. Considering the above figures (67%/100% seasonal BTTS, 80% in the last 5, 0% CS for away), I pick BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of about 82% versus 18% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate Wuhan to score 1.69 goals and Chengdu 1.22 goals (total 2.91), calculated from home offensive xG 2.30 and away defensive xG 1.07, and away offensive xG 1.52 and home defensive xG 0.91. Wuhan averages 19.67 shots and 8.0 on target per match, Chengdu 12.0 shots and 5.0 on target; with conversion rates of 19% and 21% the home side creates more chances, increasing goal probability. Both teams have a high share of matches over 2.5 goals: Wuhan 67% and Chengdu 100%, and BTTS at 67% and 100% respectively; the league average is 3.1 goals, which further supports the Over 2.5 goals market. Although seasonally Wuhan has 67% of matches over 3.5 and Chengdu 50%, Wuhan’s last 5 home matches yield only 1.6 goals scored per game and the projected total xG 2.91 is below the 3.5 threshold, so Over 3.5 is less certain (Over 3.5 = 44%). Therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over on the 2.5 line (Over 2.5 = 78%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I select the 1/1 scenario (Wuhan leading at Half-Time and winning Full-Time) because the home side have a 100% home win rate, score an average of 3.67 goals per match and 1.67 goals by Half-Time (6 first-half goals this season), and led at the break in 67% of home games. Wuhan’s higher xG (2.30 vs 1.52), greater number of shots (19.67 vs 12.0) and shots on target (8.0 vs 5.0) support their superiority in chance creation. Chengdu are in good overall form (80% wins in the last 5 matches), but their average first-half goals is only 1.00 and they have lower xG and fewer shots on target, so they are less likely to take control from the outset. Therefore I assign the 1/1 scenario a 50% probability, give outcomes such as Half-Time draw / Full-Time draw (X/X) ~10%, and a full away victory from start to finish (2/2) about 3%, reflecting the home advantage in first-half stats (1.67 vs 1.00) and full-match xG (2.30 vs 1.52).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wuhan Three Towns | Chengdu Better City FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.53 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chengdu Better City FC is 225% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 2.6 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chengdu Better City FC is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
1.6 goals / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 3.2 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC
Chengdu Better City FC is 83% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.2 goals / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 1.2 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC
Wuhan Three Towns scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Chengdu Better City FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
Chengdu Better City FC scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Wuhan Three Towns keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wuhan Three Towns
Over / Under - Chengdu Better City FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chengdu Better City FC is 175% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 2.2 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wuhan Three Towns - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Chengdu Better City FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 80%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wuhan Three Towns
Chengdu Better City FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Wuhan Three Towns | Liga | Chengdu Better City FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.80 | 2.98 | ▲ 4.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 58% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 53% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 23% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 63% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Wuhan Three Towns 0 - 1 - 1 Chengdu Better City FC. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC?
The Chinese Super League match finished Wuhan Three Towns 0:1 Chengdu Better City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City FC?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Wuhan Three Towns won 0, Chengdu Better City FC won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC?
Wuhan Three Towns score 1.60 goals per game on average and Chengdu Better City FC 3.20. The Chinese Super League average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Wuhan Three Towns's matches and 80% of Chengdu Better City FC's.
What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City FC in?
Over the last 5 games Wuhan Three Towns have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Chengdu Better City FC 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.