Wycombe Wanderers vs Sheffield Wednesday: match statistics
Wycombe Wanderers vs Sheffield Wednesday: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wycombe Wanderers played Sheffield Wednesday in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 1 September 2026. Venue: Adams Park. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Wycombe Wanderers: 0-2-1, 0.67 points/match. Sheffield Wednesday: 2-0-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wycombe Wanderers scores 1.00 and concedes 2.33 goals per match. Sheffield Wednesday scores 3.00 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wycombe Wanderers 100%, Sheffield Wednesday 67%. Over 2.5: Wycombe Wanderers 33%, Sheffield Wednesday 67%. League level: BTTS 69%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Sheffield Wednesday has higher xG: 2.04 vs 1.29. Wycombe Wanderers: 10.7 shots per match, Sheffield Wednesday: 18.7.
Match halves
Wycombe Wanderers: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33. Sheffield Wednesday: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.67.
Goals by minute
Wycombe Wanderers: 0-15 (1 goals). Sheffield Wednesday: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League One: 3.03 goals per match, BTTS 69%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sheffield Wednesday hold a slight advantage thanks to their more effective away performances: they average 2 goals per match on the road, while Wycombe score 1 at home. Both teams create a similar number of chances, averaging 14 shots and 5 on target per game, but the visitors convert 14% of their attempts compared with 7% for the hosts. Sheffield Wednesday’s away defence concedes an average xG of 1.13, lower than Wycombe’s 1.23 at home, although neither team has kept a clean sheet yet. Wycombe have drawn both of their home matches so far, whereas Sheffield Wednesday won their only away fixture, which, combined with the difference in finishing efficiency, points towards the visitors. Neither side has shown consistent form, but Sheffield Wednesday’s 1.2 points per match over their last five appearances exceeds Wycombe’s 0.6.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal comes from the teams’ current attacking form: Wycombe have averaged 0.8 goals in their last 5 matches, while Sheffield Wednesday have managed only 0.6. The visitors do have an average xG of 1.36, but their actual tally is just 3 goals in five games, pointing to finishing problems. Wycombe have failed to score in 100% of their home matches so far, while Sheffield Wednesday have conceded in every away fixture, making a scenario in which the hosts once again fail to convert their chances the most realistic outcome. Recent BTTS indicators are divergent—80% for Wycombe and 20% for Sheffield Wednesday—but the low combined scoring rate of 1.4 goals per match for both teams suggests that at least one side will fail to score. Although the league records a BTTS rate of 71%, both teams’ data from their last five matches reduces the likelihood of goals at both ends.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Wycombe’s last five matches produced an average of just 2.0 goals, with the team scoring 0.8 and conceding 1.2, while Sheffield Wednesday averaged 2.0 goals, with 0.6 scored and 1.4 conceded. Only 20% of the hosts’ recent matches and 40% of the visitors’ games went over 2.5 goals, clearly limiting the prospects of a high-scoring game. The chance-quality indicators are slightly higher, as Wycombe have created chances worth 1.35 xG and Sheffield Wednesday 1.36 xG over their last five matches, but this is not currently translating into finishing efficiency for either attack. The projected total of 2.25 goals remains below the league average of 2.63, making Under 3.5 the safest signal; the bet would only lose if there were at least four goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Sheffield Wednesday victory at full-time, as both teams often start cautiously: the first 45 minutes ended level in 60% of Wycombe’s last five matches and in 75% of Sheffield’s games. Across those same five appearances, the hosts averaged 0.4 goals before the break, while the visitors averaged just 0.25, limiting the likelihood of either side establishing a clear early advantage. After the interval, Sheffield have performed considerably better, scoring an average of 0.5 goals and conceding just 0.25, whereas Wycombe score 0.4 goals but allow opponents 0.8. The visitors also have a stronger record in the latter stages of matches, averaging 1.75 points after half-time compared with Wycombe’s 0.8; across their last five league fixtures, they won 40% of matches, while the hosts recorded no victories. Sheffield’s superior second-half efficiency should therefore turn an even contest in their favour.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wycombe Wanderers | Sheffield Wednesday | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sheffield Wednesday is 199% better for: last-5 form.
0.67 pts / match - Wycombe Wanderers · 2 pts / match - Sheffield Wednesday
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sheffield Wednesday is 200% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Wycombe Wanderers · 3 goals / match - Sheffield Wednesday
Sheffield Wednesday is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.33 goals / match - Wycombe Wanderers · 1.33 goals / match - Sheffield Wednesday
Wycombe Wanderers scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Sheffield Wednesday keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).
Sheffield Wednesday scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Wycombe Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wycombe Wanderers
Over / Under - Sheffield Wednesday
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sheffield Wednesday is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Wycombe Wanderers · 1.67 pts / match - Sheffield Wednesday
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wycombe Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Sheffield Wednesday - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Average goals in match | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 67% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.67 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.7 | 2.7 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wycombe Wanderers
Sheffield Wednesday
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Wycombe Wanderers | Liga | Sheffield Wednesday | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.33 | 3.03 | ▲ 4.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 69% | ▼ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 57% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 20% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 60% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 89% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Wycombe Wanderers vs Sheffield Wednesday?
The EFL League One match finished Wycombe Wanderers 1:2 Sheffield Wednesday. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wycombe Wanderers vs Sheffield Wednesday?
Wycombe Wanderers score 1.00 goals per game on average and Sheffield Wednesday 3.00. The EFL League One average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Wycombe Wanderers's matches and 67% of Sheffield Wednesday's.
What form are Wycombe Wanderers and Sheffield Wednesday in?
Over the last 5 games Wycombe Wanderers have a 0-2-1 record (0.67 points per game) and Sheffield Wednesday 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wycombe Wanderers vs Sheffield Wednesday?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


