Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Xorazm vs Andijan: match statistics

Xorazm crest
Xorazm
0 : 3half-time 0:2
Andijan crest
Andijan

Xorazm vs Andijan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Xorazm played Andijan in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 4 May 2026. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Xorazm: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Andijan: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Xorazm scores 0.90 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Andijan scores 1.30 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Xorazm 50%, Andijan 40%. Over 2.5: Xorazm 30%, Andijan 60%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Andijan has higher xG: 1.49 vs 0.94. Xorazm: 7.1 shots per match, Andijan: 11.6.

Match halves

Xorazm: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.70. Andijan: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.90.

Goals by minute

Xorazm: 46-60 (4 goals). Andijan: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win because Xorazm averages 1.2 goals per home match, has a 14% conversion rate and only 20% of home games without a goal, alongside a 40% home win rate. Andijan scores 0.8 goals away, with a low 8% conversion and a very high 60% share of goalless away matches; away wins are only 20%. However, the visitors create more chances (10.2 shots and 3 on target per game) and have a higher away xG of 1.31 versus the hosts’ 1.11, indicating they can generate but not finish opportunities. Both teams concede on average 1.4 goals, so finishing will be decisive: Xorazm’s last 5 matches show 1 win and 3 draws (PPG 1.2), while Andijan have 2 wins in 5 (PPG 1.4) but a poor away run (3 losses in their last 5 away games). Therefore I favour the hosts (better efficiency and lower FTS), although a draw remains realistic given the visitors’ higher xG and shot volume.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 40%, well below the league average of 55%, so historically their matches less frequently end Goal/Goal (40% vs 55%). Xorazm scores on average 1.8 goals and concedes 0.8 per match, whereas Andijan scores only 0.8 and concedes 1.4, giving the home side an offensive edge (1.8 vs 0.8) and limiting the visitors' realistic scoring chances. A shorter-form view shows improvement for Andijan: in the last 5 matches the visitors have xG_for 1.61 and 60% BTTS, while Xorazm has xG_for 0.97 and 40% BTTS, so the visitors are creating more opportunities (1.61 vs 0.97). Despite that, Xorazm has a seasonal 40% clean sheets rate versus 20% for Andijan, and the visitors average only 3.0 shots on target with an 8% conversion, while the hosts register 5.2 SoT and 14% conversion, increasing the likelihood that only the home side will score. As a result I assess 'BTTS - No' as more probable, assigning it 60% versus 40% for 'BTTS - Yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected goals based on xG are approximately 1.44 for Xorazm (xG for 1.64 vs xG against from Andijan 1.24) and 1.18 for Andijan (xG for 1.31 vs xG against from Xorazm 1.04), total 2.62. A Poisson model with λ=2.62 indicates about a 74% probability of over 1.5 goals (1−P(0)−P(1)≈73.6%) and about 48% for over 2.5 goals, which strongly favors Over 1.5. Seasonal data confirm this direction: Xorazm has 80% of matches over 1.5 goals, Andijan 60%, and both teams record 60% of matches over 2.5 goals; the league average goals is 2.63. Tempering excessive optimism, the last 5 matches show Xorazm recently with xG 0.97 and averaging 0.8 goals, while Andijan has xG 1.61 and 1.2 goals, so Over 3.5 is less likely (seasonal 20% for both, Poisson ≈26%). Considering Xorazm’s advantage in shots (13.0 average and 5.2 on target versus 10.2 and 3.0 for Andijan) and higher conversion rate 14% vs 8%, I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Xorazm is the clear favorite: they score on average 1.8 goals per match versus 0.8 for Andijan, have an xG of 1.64 compared to the opponent’s 1.31, register 5.2 shots on target per game against the visitors’ 3.0 and convert at 14% vs 8%. At half-time the hosts average 0.6 goals and lead in 40% of matches, while Andijan averages 0.2 goals by the break and leads in only 20% of games, which strongly favors Xorazm at half-time. Xorazm also have 8 points gained by half-time versus 5 for the opponent (1.6 points at half-time vs 1.0) and record an average of 1.6 goals in second halves with 80% second-half win rate, so maintaining the lead to full-time is likely. Considering Xorazm’s 60% win rate this season versus Andijan’s 20%, the strongest signal is HT/FT 1/1, although the last 5 matches show better form for the visitors (40% wins vs 20% for the hosts), so a turnaround cannot be entirely ruled out.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
XorazmAndijan
12Shots11
XorazmAndijan
3Shots on target6
XorazmAndijan
1.4xG1.42
XorazmAndijan
6Corners4
XorazmAndijan
61Dangerous attacks42
XorazmAndijan
6Fouls7
XorazmAndijan
2Cards1
XorazmAndijan

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.9Goals scored / match1.3
XorazmAndijan
1Goals conceded / match1.1
XorazmAndijan
48%Average possession49%
XorazmAndijan
1.9Shots on target / match4.1
XorazmAndijan

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.1Shots per match11.6
XorazmAndijan
1.9Shots on target4.1
XorazmAndijan
12.7%Shot conversion11.2%
XorazmAndijan
48%Possession49%
XorazmAndijan
0.94xG for1.49
XorazmAndijan
1.46xG against1.13
XorazmAndijan

Shooting quality

Xorazm: BalancedAndijan: Balanced
XorazmAndijan
Accuracy (shots on target)27%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.470.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Andijan is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Xorazm · 1.4 pts / match - Andijan

Xorazm
DDWLD
Season result split
30% W40% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-3
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Andijan
LLDWW
Season result split
40% W10% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-5
1.30 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Andijan is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

0.9 goals / match - Xorazm · 1.3 goals / match - Andijan

Xorazm is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Xorazm · 1.1 goals / match - Andijan

Xorazm scoring profile: strong

Xorazm scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Andijan keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

Andijan scoring profile: strong

Andijan scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Xorazm keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

9Goals scored (season)13
XorazmAndijan
10Goals conceded (season)11
XorazmAndijan
1.9Average goals in match2.4
XorazmAndijan
4Goals scored (last 5)6
XorazmAndijan
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
XorazmAndijan

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal60%
XorazmAndijan
20%2 goals40%
XorazmAndijan
0%3 goals20%
XorazmAndijan
0%4 goals10%
XorazmAndijan

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal70%
XorazmAndijan
30%2 goals30%
XorazmAndijan
0%3 goals10%
XorazmAndijan
0%4 goals0%
XorazmAndijan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time0%
XorazmAndijan
10%BTTS in both halves0%
XorazmAndijan
20%Scored in both halves30%
XorazmAndijan

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
XorazmAndijan
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
XorazmAndijan
40%BTTS - last 560%
XorazmAndijan

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
XorazmAndijan
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
XorazmAndijan
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
XorazmAndijan

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
XorazmAndijan
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
XorazmAndijan
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
XorazmAndijan

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Andijan is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.9 pts / match - Xorazm · 1.3 pts / match - Andijan

Xorazm - half-time state
10% leading60% draw30% trailing
Andijan - half-time state
30% leading40% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.9Points per match (1st half)1.3
XorazmAndijan
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.4
XorazmAndijan
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
XorazmAndijan
0.7Average goals (1st half)0.8
XorazmAndijan
60%Clean sheet before half-time70%
XorazmAndijan
80%No goal before half-time70%
XorazmAndijan

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1.7
XorazmAndijan
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.9
XorazmAndijan
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
XorazmAndijan
1.2Average goals (2nd half)1.6
XorazmAndijan
50%Clean sheet after half-time40%
XorazmAndijan
30%No goal after half-time40%
XorazmAndijan

Xorazm - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
9
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Andijan - second-half results

50% W20% R30% P
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Xorazm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Andijan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Xorazm
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Andijan
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
0
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
83%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+133%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Xorazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Andijan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
46% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
46%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

XorazmLigaAndijan
Average goals in match 1.902.58 2.40
Both teams scored 50%54% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%52% 60%
Clean sheets 30%26% 30%
Goal before half-time 50%68% 60%
Goal after half-time 90%78% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. XorazmSubstitutionOn: Nodirbek AbdikhalikovOff: Diyor Ortiqboyev
  2. XorazmSubstitutionOn: Abror KhusinovOff: Matija Rom
  3. XorazmSubstitutionOn: Sultonboy IsmoilovOff: Rustam Abdukhamidov
  4. XorazmYellow cardDanila Ezhov
  5. AndijanSubstitutionOn: Dragan ĆeranOff: Khumoyunmirzo Iminov
  6. AndijanYellow cardMakhmudjon Makhamadjonov
  7. XorazmYellow cardAbbosjon Otakhonov
  8. AndijanSubstitutionOn: Abdulvokhid GulomovOff: Imeda Ashortia
  9. AndijanGoalDragan Ćeran

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Xorazm 0 - 0 - 2 Andijan. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FK Andijan
3 : 2
Xorazm FK Urganch
Xorazm FK Urganch
2 : 3
FK Andijan

FAQ

What was the result of Xorazm vs Andijan?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Xorazm 0:3 Andijan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Xorazm and Andijan?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Xorazm won 0, Andijan won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Xorazm vs Andijan?

Xorazm score 0.90 goals per game on average and Andijan 1.30. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Xorazm's matches and 40% of Andijan's.

What form are Xorazm and Andijan in?

Over the last 5 games Xorazm have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Andijan 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Xorazm vs Andijan?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Xorazm vs Andijan: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.