Xorazm vs Sogdiana: match statistics
Xorazm vs Sogdiana: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Xorazm played Sogdiana in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 10 September 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Xorazm: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Sogdiana: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Xorazm scores 0.85 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. Sogdiana scores 1.85 and concedes 2.05. League average: 2.65 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Xorazm 45%, Sogdiana 75%. Over 2.5: Xorazm 40%, Sogdiana 80%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Sogdiana has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.01. Xorazm: 7.7 shots per match, Sogdiana: 11.7.
Match halves
Xorazm: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.45. Sogdiana: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Xorazm: 31-45+ (5 goals). Sogdiana: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uzbekistan Super League: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sogdiana enter the match in clearly better current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 12 goals and averaging 2.4 points, while Xorazm have suffered 3 defeats, scored 5 goals and collected 0.8 points per match. The visitors have been more effective over the course of the season, scoring 37 goals compared with the hosts’ 17, while averaging 4.7 shots on target per away match against Xorazm’s 2.44 at home. Xorazm have the advantage of playing at home, where they win 44% of matches and concede an average of 1.44 goals, but their average attacking xG is only 1.17. Sogdiana’s away defence is vulnerable, however, having kept no clean sheets and conceding an average of 2 goals and an xG of 1.65, so the hosts should create chances of their own. Despite this defensive weakness, the visitors’ advantage is underpinned by their significantly better current form and an average of 1.5 goals scored away from home, making an away win the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are clearly high: Xorazm have recorded BTTS in 70% of their matches, while Sogdiana have done so in as many as 80%, compared with the league average of 54%. Both defenses regularly concede goals, with the hosts allowing an average of 2.1 goals per match and the visitors 2.0, while Xorazm have kept clean sheets in only 20% of games and Sogdiana in 0%. Their attacking potential is supported by average xG figures of 1.52 for the hosts and 1.41 for the visitors, while both teams register 5.56 and 4.70 shots on target per match, respectively. The last five matches slightly reduce confidence in the pick, as Xorazm scored only 1.0 goal per game and had BTTS in 40% of matches, whereas Sogdiana scored 2.4 goals and Xorazm’s opponents averaged 1.72 xG. The more likely scenario therefore remains a goal for both sides, especially since defensively vulnerable Sogdiana have failed to keep a clean sheet throughout the entire season.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The profile of both teams clearly points to goals: at least 2 goals were scored in 90% of Xorazm’s matches and in all of Sogdiana’s games. The Over 2.5 goals line landed in 70% and 90% of matches respectively, significantly more often than the league average of 51%. Sogdiana have recently averaged 2.4 goals per match, while their xG over five appearances stands at 1.67, compared with the 1.72 xG allowed by Xorazm over the same period. Both defences rarely keep clean sheets, particularly the visitors, who have failed to do so even once, and both teams concede at least 2.0 goals per match across the season. Over 1.5 goals remains the strongest pick, as the season data and Sogdiana’s attacking potential significantly reduce the risk of a game finishing with no more than one goal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Sogdiana victory, as the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches and averaged 2.4 goals in those games, while Xorazm have won just once and scored 1.0 goal per match. In their last five matches, Sogdiana have averaged 1.4 goals after the break and won the second half in 60% of cases, whereas Xorazm scored just 0.4 goals during that period and lost the second half in 60% of matches. The hosts do have a better full-season first-half record, leading in 60% of matches compared with Sogdiana's 30%, but current form reverses that picture: the visitors led at the break in 60% of their last five appearances, while Xorazm did so in only 40%. A draw after 45 minutes is supported by the limited first-half goal production of both teams in the current run: Xorazm average 0.6 goals before the break and Sogdiana 1.0, with each team recording at least two first-half goals in just 20% of matches. Sogdiana's advantage in the later phase of the match, together with an average of 2.0 points won in the second halves of their last five games compared with Xorazm's 0.8, increases the likelihood of a result in the visitors' favour after an evenly matched start.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Xorazm | Sogdiana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sogdiana is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Xorazm · 2.4 pts / match - Sogdiana
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sogdiana is 118% better for: goals scored per match.
0.85 goals / match - Xorazm · 1.85 goals / match - Sogdiana
Xorazm is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.45 goals / match - Xorazm · 2.05 goals / match - Sogdiana
Xorazm scores in 65% of matches (13 of 20 matches), while Sogdiana keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 matches).
Sogdiana scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Xorazm keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Xorazm
Over / Under - Sogdiana
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sogdiana is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.05 pts / match - Xorazm · 1.6 pts / match - Sogdiana
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Xorazm - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Sogdiana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 40%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Xorazm
Sogdiana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Xorazm | Liga | Sogdiana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.30 | 2.65 | ▲ 3.90 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 54% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 52% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 26% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 68% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 77% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Xorazm 0 - 0 - 3 Sogdiana. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Xorazm vs Sogdiana?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Xorazm 0:0 Sogdiana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Xorazm and Sogdiana?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Xorazm won 0, Sogdiana won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Xorazm vs Sogdiana?
Xorazm score 0.85 goals per game on average and Sogdiana 1.85. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Xorazm's matches and 75% of Sogdiana's.
What form are Xorazm and Sogdiana in?
Over the last 5 games Xorazm have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sogdiana 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Xorazm vs Sogdiana?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


