Japan - J2 LeagueData current as of 14 October 2026

Yokohama vs Oita Trinita: match statistics

Yokohama crest
Yokohama
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Oita Trinita crest
Oita Trinita

Yokohama vs Oita Trinita: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Yokohama played Oita Trinita in J2 League (Japan). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Yokohama: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Oita Trinita: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Yokohama scores 2.00 and concedes 1.22 goals per match. Oita Trinita scores 1.00 and concedes 0.78. League average: 2.66 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Yokohama 44%, Oita Trinita 56%. Over 2.5: Yokohama 56%, Oita Trinita 22%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Yokohama has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.16. Yokohama: 14.4 shots per match, Oita Trinita: 9.9.

Match halves

Yokohama: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 1.00. Oita Trinita: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Yokohama: 16-30 (4 goals). Oita Trinita: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J2 League: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Yokohama are favourites: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while Oita Trinita have recorded just 1 win and 4 draws over the same period. At home, Yokohama have won 75% of their matches and scored an average of 3 goals, whereas Oita have yet to win away and have managed just 0.25 goals per match. Yokohama’s advantage is also reflected in the quality of chances created: their home xG stands at 1.81, compared with Oita’s away xG of 1.08, while the visitors allow opponents chances worth 1.68 xG. Oita concede only 0.5 goals per away match and keep a clean sheet in 50% of their games, so a draw remains a realistic possibility. However, with the visitors failing to score in 75% of their away matches, Yokohama are more likely to come out on top.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest case for BTTS - No is Oita’s poor away scoring record: they average just 0.25 goals and have failed to score in 75% of those matches. The visitors average 2.25 shots on target per game, with a shot conversion rate of 3%, making it difficult to break this trend. Yokohama have greater attacking potential at home, averaging 1.6 goals, while Oita concede an average of 0.5 away from home. This makes the BTTS - No pick hinge primarily on the risk of the visitors failing to score. However, this is not a strong signal: Yokohama have not kept a clean sheet at home, and Oita have averaged 1 goal and recorded BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches. Therefore, the likelihood that at least one team will fail to score is only marginally higher.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: all of Oita’s matches so far and 80% of Yokohama’s matches have finished with no more than three goals. Oita averages just 0.25 goals per match and has failed to score in 75% of its games, limiting the likelihood of a high-scoring game. Yokohama averages 1.6 goals, but Oita concedes only 0.5, so a one-sided match with four goals is difficult to envisage. Yokohama’s last five matches averaged 3.2 goals, which poses a risk to this pick; however, Oita conceded an average of just 0.8 goals over the same period. The forecast of 2.20 total goals supports Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest half-time signal points to a draw: Oita Trinita were level at the break in all four of their away matches, scoring and conceding no goals before half-time. Yokohama also failed to score before the break in four of their five home matches, so their advantage may only emerge later. After half-time, the hosts average 1.0 goals scored and 0.2 conceded at home, while the visitors score 0.25 and concede 0.5 goals in this period away from home. Yokohama’s case for a full-time win is also supported by their average of 1.6 goals scored per match, compared with Oita’s 0.25, as well as the visitors’ xG conceded of 1.68. The X/1 pick is therefore best supported by the data, although Oita’s four draws in their last five matches make X/X a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
YokohamaOita Trinita
15Shots18
YokohamaOita Trinita
6Shots on target5
YokohamaOita Trinita
1.84xG1.82
YokohamaOita Trinita
7Corners3
YokohamaOita Trinita
67Dangerous attacks48
YokohamaOita Trinita
7Fouls16
YokohamaOita Trinita
2Cards3
YokohamaOita Trinita

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

YokohamaOita Trinita
2Goals scored / match1
YokohamaOita Trinita
1.22Goals conceded / match0.78
YokohamaOita Trinita
55%Average possession48%
YokohamaOita Trinita
4.78Shots on target / match3
YokohamaOita Trinita

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.44Shots per match9.89
YokohamaOita Trinita
4.78Shots on target3
YokohamaOita Trinita
13.8%Shot conversion10.1%
YokohamaOita Trinita
55%Possession48%
YokohamaOita Trinita
1.68xG for1.16
YokohamaOita Trinita
1.67xG against1.43
YokohamaOita Trinita

Shooting quality

Yokohama: DominantOita Trinita: Balanced
YokohamaOita Trinita
Accuracy (shots on target)33%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Yokohama is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Yokohama · 1.4 pts / match - Oita Trinita

Yokohama
WLWDW
Season result split
56% W22% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-2
1.89 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Oita Trinita
DDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
22% W56% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-2
1.22 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-1
Last 5 away
0-3-1
DLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Yokohama is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Yokohama · 1 goals / match - Oita Trinita

Oita Trinita is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.22 goals / match - Yokohama · 0.78 goals / match - Oita Trinita

Yokohama scoring profile: very strong

Yokohama scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Oita Trinita keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).

Oita Trinita scoring profile: mixed

Oita Trinita scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while Yokohama keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).

18Goals scored (season)9
YokohamaOita Trinita
11Goals conceded (season)7
YokohamaOita Trinita
3.22Average goals in match1.78
YokohamaOita Trinita
12Goals scored (last 5)5
YokohamaOita Trinita
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
YokohamaOita Trinita

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal56%
YokohamaOita Trinita
67%2 goals22%
YokohamaOita Trinita
33%3 goals11%
YokohamaOita Trinita
11%4 goals11%
YokohamaOita Trinita

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal78%
YokohamaOita Trinita
44%2 goals0%
YokohamaOita Trinita
11%3 goals0%
YokohamaOita Trinita
0%4 goals0%
YokohamaOita Trinita

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time11%
YokohamaOita Trinita
11%BTTS in both halves0%
YokohamaOita Trinita
44%Scored in both halves11%
YokohamaOita Trinita

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
YokohamaOita Trinita
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
YokohamaOita Trinita
40%BTTS - last 580%
YokohamaOita Trinita

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time44%
YokohamaOita Trinita
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
YokohamaOita Trinita
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
YokohamaOita Trinita

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
YokohamaOita Trinita
78%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
YokohamaOita Trinita
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
YokohamaOita Trinita

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Yokohama is 137% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.11 pts / match - Yokohama · 0.89 pts / match - Oita Trinita

Yokohama - half-time state
56% leading44% draw0% trailing
Oita Trinita - half-time state
11% leading56% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.11Points per match (1st half)0.89
YokohamaOita Trinita
1Goals scored (1st half)0.33
YokohamaOita Trinita
0.22Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
YokohamaOita Trinita
1.22Average goals (1st half)0.78
YokohamaOita Trinita
78%Clean sheet before half-time56%
YokohamaOita Trinita
33%No goal before half-time89%
YokohamaOita Trinita

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.78
YokohamaOita Trinita
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
YokohamaOita Trinita
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
YokohamaOita Trinita
2Average goals (2nd half)1
YokohamaOita Trinita
33%Clean sheet after half-time67%
YokohamaOita Trinita
44%No goal after half-time44%
YokohamaOita Trinita

Yokohama - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
19
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Oita Trinita - second-half results

44% W44% D11% L
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Yokohama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.00
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+60
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7
Oita Trinita - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.20
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Yokohama
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
4
0
16-30
4
1
31-45
2
3
46-60
3
1
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Oita Trinita
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Yokohama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
135%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Oita Trinita

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.65
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

YokohamaLigaOita Trinita
Average goals in match▲ 3.222.66▼ 1.78
Both teams scored▼ 44%52%▲ 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 56%50%▼ 22%
Clean sheets▲ 33%28%▼ 22%
Goal before half-time• 67%68%▼ 44%
Goal after half-time▲ 89%80%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.66
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. YokohamaYellow cardHinata Ogura
  2. Oita TrinitaYellow cardTaira Shige
  3. Oita TrinitaYellow cardMatheus Sousa Pereira
  4. YokohamaSubstitutionOn: Akiyuki YokoyamaOff: Leo Takae
  5. Oita TrinitaSubstitutionOn: Manato KimotoOff: Patrick Verhon Pertel Pereira
  6. Oita TrinitaYellow cardKeigo Sakakibara
  7. YokohamaYellow cardTakuya Shimamura
  8. YokohamaSubstitutionOn: Ryo KubotaOff: Toma Murata
  9. Oita TrinitaGoalManato Kimoto

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Yokohama vs Oita Trinita?

The J2 League match finished Yokohama 1:2 Oita Trinita. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Yokohama vs Oita Trinita?

Yokohama score 2.00 goals per game on average and Oita Trinita 1.00. The J2 League average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Yokohama's matches and 56% of Oita Trinita's.

What form are Yokohama and Oita Trinita in?

Over the last 5 games Yokohama have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Oita Trinita 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yokohama vs Oita Trinita?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.